GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

3.73 vs 4.10 which would be better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/11/12, 08:51 AM
  #1  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.73 vs 4.10 which would be better

I have a 2008 mustang gt with bama tune and have a Cai also with off-road x pipe and frpp stingers but also I don't wanna lose mpg
Old 6/11/12, 09:11 AM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by agomez
I have a 2008 mustang gt with bama tune and have a Cai also with off-road x pipe and frpp stingers but also I don't wanna lose mpg

You'll loose in either case if you have a 3.31 in there now. Less with the 3.73 and more with the 4.11.
Old 6/11/12, 10:05 AM
  #3  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay thanks but which would go go with if u had to choose
Old 6/11/12, 10:54 AM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
Rjaniz's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just put 3.73 in mine a couple months ago. Before, I was running 3.31s, FRPP CAI, bama tune, and the FRPP M230S Exhaust with 20" Shelby Razors. I was getting about 23MPG on the highway, 21MPG on the backroads.

When I put the 3.73s on, I also put on a Steeda underdrive pulley, I am now getting 27+MPG on the highway (with everything from before still there). On the back roads, it's like 19-20mpg...because I love to hear it roar. :P

As for which one would be better for you, no idea...but I can tell you that I am completely satisfied with the 3.73s. No regrets at all.
Old 6/11/12, 11:34 AM
  #5  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that great info and what kind of tune were you running that time when u installed the 3.73 and did you fill the difference after the installation and dis you ever run the car at the track what time did u get
Old 6/11/12, 12:06 PM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
Rjaniz's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running their 89 "I'll pass state inspection" tune and have been for a while. (I forget the name exactly, but it's their "safest" 89 tune.) I would say I definitely felt the difference.

It didn't knock my socks off but it definitely felt more peppier. Getting onto the highway is a whole new [great] experience. If you can, see if you find a few stangs with 3.73s in them and test drive. Bullitts came stock with 3.73s, I believe, and the lots probably have a new 2013 sitting around with 3.73 in them.

No, my car has never been tracked(so long as I've owned it anyway).

EDIT: Doing a quick Autotrader search using your location listed from the forum, there's a 2010GT with 3.73s not too far from you. http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...22217791&Log=0 (it doesn't list that it has 3.73s, but I looked up the vin on Ford's window sticker generator and it came from the factory with 3.73s)

Last edited by Rjaniz; 6/11/12 at 12:10 PM.
Old 6/11/12, 12:34 PM
  #7  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay thanks I think ill go test drive it Wednesday to see how it feels and do u happen to have video of your car takeing off
Old 6/11/12, 12:48 PM
  #8  
Cobra Member
 
Planeswalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Do you do alot of highway driving? If not I doubt you will notice any loss in MPG and could see an increase. What you will notice is an increase is pulling power when taking off.

At 75mph your RPMs will be around;
3.55 2233
3.73 2347
4.10 2579
This is with a manual 5spd

I see alot of people complaing that it makes 1st gear worthless, or they have to shift more. If you are one of these people trade in for an automatic.

The modular 4.6 makes it's power in higher RPMs, don't fear the gear if you want to get to your power quicker! Some cars can lose time in the 1320, ours don't.

Go with the 3.73s if you want to be more conservative for a daily driver, 4.10s for max fun factor. Feel free to ask any specific questions you may have.
Old 6/11/12, 01:00 PM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
 
Rjaniz's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by agomez
Okay thanks I think ill go test drive it Wednesday to see how it feels and do u happen to have video of your car takeing off
Sorry, no video. But in all honesty you wouldn't get any sort of information from a video aside from my exhaust sound anyway.
Old 6/11/12, 01:15 PM
  #10  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only use the car for work which is only 17 miles away or when I go out but its not to far also but its hard to decide and do they 4.10s burn your tires quick cause I just bought some new ones
Old 6/11/12, 01:30 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
muscledom's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 16, 2011
Location: Seville, FL
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You CAN NOT go wrong with 410s. Just got mine installed last week. Went from 331 to 410, really noticeable difference. Especially since I'm cammed and have less low end torque than stock. Loss in mpg is negligible.
Old 6/11/12, 01:40 PM
  #12  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive also heard when u have 4.10s on city it increases and when u drive on highway it decreases
Old 6/11/12, 03:04 PM
  #13  
Cobra Member
 
Planeswalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by agomez
I only use the car for work which is only 17 miles away or when I go out but its not to far also but its hard to decide and do they 4.10s burn your tires quick cause I just bought some new ones
The only way it would wear your tires out quicker is if you are having to much fun with them!
Old 6/11/12, 03:29 PM
  #14  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True hope I decide soon
Old 6/11/12, 03:38 PM
  #15  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
06blackvertstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 9, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rjaniz
I just put 3.73 in mine a couple months ago. Before, I was running 3.31s, FRPP CAI, bama tune, and the FRPP M230S Exhaust with 20" Shelby Razors. I was getting about 23MPG on the highway, 21MPG on the backroads.

When I put the 3.73s on, I also put on a Steeda underdrive pulley, I am now getting 27+MPG on the highway (with everything from before still there). On the back roads, it's like 19-20mpg...because I love to hear it roar. :P

As for which one would be better for you, no idea...but I can tell you that I am completely satisfied with the 3.73s. No regrets at all.
That is a huge jump in mpg!! Is it really true?
Old 6/11/12, 04:02 PM
  #16  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So its true about the a/c not cooling as much with the UDP
Old 6/11/12, 04:37 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 19,993
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by agomez
I have a 2008 mustang gt with bama tune and have a Cai also with off-road x pipe and frpp stingers but also I don't wanna lose mpg
I love the 3.73's. Keeps me in the power band on 2 lane twisties. And in the quarter, 4.10's will require a shift to 4th.

When I let cruise control drive @ 65 on level ground I get 27mpg (100% stock). My all around (75 hwy/25 city) is 23.5.

.
Attached Thumbnails 3.73 vs 4.10 which would be better-27mpg-5.12.12.jpg  

Last edited by cdynaco; 6/11/12 at 04:38 PM.
Old 6/11/12, 05:36 PM
  #18  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks good advice I think ill go with the 3.73s
Old 6/11/12, 08:22 PM
  #19  
Mach 1 Member
 
Kevin509's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 30, 2011
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 3.73s in my car and IMO theyre the perfect daily driver gear ratio. The engine still settles down nicely in 5th at 75 and i average 21 mpg to a tank in mixed driving. But when I step on it it really picks up, and downshifting to 4th to overtake on the highway really gets the car moving.

I can confirm that my car with only the gears was significantly faster than an 07 GT 5speed with CAI and tune and the stock 3.31 gears.

4.10s will make a big difference on the strip but IMO are too aggressive for a daily driver. That's just my opinion...
Old 6/11/12, 09:10 PM
  #20  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
agomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2012
Location: mercedes,tx
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay so 3.73s it is do you guys know how much it cost too put them on


Quick Reply: 3.73 vs 4.10 which would be better



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.