GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

3.55 to 3.73, is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
3.55 to 3.73, is it worth it?

I'm running out of mod to do the stang! the mod bug kills me, LOL.

considering I've maxed out the HP potential on my stock motor, I'm looking for an alternative performance addition to the stang.

Someone brought up the idea of gears. I'm running 3.55 gears, people have told me to go 3.73 or 4.10. and yet again its a back to back battle, some say 3.73 you won't feel any difference from 3.55, and 4.10's are way too much for a s/c manual.

help! what do you guys consider for a whipple s/c manual?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #2  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
lots of people drive around with 4.10s with more power than what you have. Personally I would not step up to just a 3.73 because the small increase in ratio is not worth the cost of having gear noise from popping the cherry on your factory rear end. It will be more aggrivation than it's worth.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:00 AM
  #3  
classix_stang289's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Im not sure what company, but there is a oddball ratio of 3.90's. Maybe richmond?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #4  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
A whippled GT makes plenty of low end grunt since you get boost at low rpm's, so gearing won't really make a big difference like it would in a N/A car, or one with a turbo/centrifugal. I would suggest keeping the 3.55's and spending that money on a different mod that better compliments your whipple's low end grunt.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #5  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
A whippled GT makes plenty of low end grunt since you get boost at low rpm's, so gearing won't really make a big difference like it would in a N/A car, or one with a turbo/centrifugal. I would suggest keeping the 3.55's and spending that money on a different mod that better compliments your whipple's low end grunt.

like what?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:34 AM
  #6  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Go 4.10's! They are awesome with the WHIPPLE. Absolutely no regrets... None.. I thought the car was fun with the WHIPPLE, but now with the 4.10's it's insane. lol
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #7  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Torrence
Go 4.10's! They are awesome with the WHIPPLE. Absolutely no regrets... None.. I thought the car was fun with the WHIPPLE, but now with the 4.10's it's insane. lol
I bet the traction is bad with the 4.10s?

aren't you from jersey?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:54 AM
  #8  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MaverickMLFD371
I bet the traction is bad with the 4.10s?

aren't you from jersey?

I'm from Jersey.....


I have no traction issues. Just pull off a little slow and I have a ton of suspension mods + sticky tires so I love driving this thing. I thought the car was quick before, but now it's just ridiculous. lol

Should have installed the 4.10's a long time ago. I had 3.90's, but they wined too much and had the 4.10's installed. You will not regret it.

Last edited by Torrence; Nov 11, 2008 at 09:22 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #9  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
IF you're doing any kind of gear swap, consider either having a truetrac diff put in, or replace your carbon fiber clutch packs when you do your gears.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #10  
jjw368's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, VA
Originally Posted by Torrence
Go 4.10's! They are awesome with the WHIPPLE. Absolutely no regrets... None.. I thought the car was fun with the WHIPPLE, but now with the 4.10's it's insane. lol
Don't waste time and money on 3.73...4.10 all the way. Just make sure you get the computer changed (most tuners will do it) so that you know what they are pulling you over for!
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #11  
Error404's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2005
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Culver City
I had 4.10s when my manual transmission went into the car. I think 4.10's are to much for a manual transmission supercharged car, at least for me anyway. I liked them with the automatic, but didn't like them with the manual. I went back down to 3.55s and I like them better. But relating to your question, I don't think a jump from 3.55 to 3.73 will be much noticeable. Probably about the biggest thing you'll notice is a slightly higher cruising RPM?

Last edited by Error404; Nov 11, 2008 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #12  
Rays197's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 16, 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach
IMO if you are going to see some track time with your car then go with the 4.10. If not why spend the money to chance a problem. Have you considered go with a new Drive Shaft to reduce some weight??
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #13  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #14  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by nem
IMO if you are going to see some track time with your car then go with the 4.10. If not why spend the money to chance a problem. Have you considered go with a new Drive Shaft to reduce some weight??
i'm already shafted with the coast d/s
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #15  
Indystang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield In.
2.73 Gears

Originally Posted by metroplex
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
My 86 GT had 2.73s stock from the factory and it would show 78 mph at 2000 rpms in 5th gear 225/60/15 stock size tires. I got about 27 mpg running 65-70 though.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #16  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by metroplex
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
This is a joke... right?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 05:57 AM
  #17  
JonCo's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2007
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
From: Ellenton, FL
Originally Posted by metroplex
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
Wrong choice of cars then if your worried about that
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #18  
Rays197's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 16, 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach
How about a Livernois 298 stroker then turn up the boost. You could go with a set of their stage 3 heads but i wouldnt put the heads on boosted without a forged bottom end. No need to risk the heads on the stock bottom end.

Last edited by Rays197; Nov 12, 2008 at 06:46 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 06:44 AM
  #19  
VAiN's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 28, 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by metroplex
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
Originally Posted by don_w
This is a joke... right?
+1 on that... please tell us that's a joke.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #20  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by metroplex
I kind of wish my GT came with 2.73s so I could drive normal highway speeds and keep the RPMs below 2k.
I bought my 89 Mustang 5.0L LX brand new with 2.73 gears and within 60 days had 3.73's installed as the 2.73's were absolute garbage! Car was much more enjoyable to drive with 3.73's. If you want super low freeway cruising rpm's, get a steeper overdrive ratio which only affects high gear, not all gears!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 AM.