12.45 @107.92
#22
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting my SCT Tune today. I was told it was the same tune from JDM Engineering. Not doing CAI but I will be doing a KN filter and getting rid of the HC trap. The rest of the car is stock. I will let you all know how it works. The tuners will be doing a Dyno before and after so I will have them to compare.
#23
Originally posted by Import-Slaya+February 24, 2005, 4:55 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Import-Slaya @ February 24, 2005, 4:55 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-PACETTR@February 24, 2005, 12:32 AM
I thought this car had the "charge motion plates"??? I haven't read the full article in MM&FF, but I didn't notice its mention... :scratch:
I thought this car had the "charge motion plates"??? I haven't read the full article in MM&FF, but I didn't notice its mention... :scratch:
What is interesting is that the JDM car didn't have an intake (good for ~10-15rwhp) or charge motion plates (good for another ~5-10rwhp) and it still had a very similar time. Could be driver differences, weather differences, or track differences?
![Dunno](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
My guess is that since JDM used one of the top guys from SCT to tune it, they got an absolute killer tune on their car, whereas the JMS-chip car was using their off-the-shelf tune that they are selling to customers. That alone could make up the ~15-25 theoretical difference due to the parts.
:scratch:
[/b][/quote]
![Idea](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/idea.gif)
![werd.gif](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post