"Mustang vs. GTO" in Autoweek
Anyone seen the latest Autoweek? They pit the 05 Mustang against the 05 GTO. Mustang wins!!! Here's the last paragraph:
"Overall the Musang backs up its looks with a handling performance that puts to shame the GTO's. Any minor shortfall at the strip was worth how brightly the Mustang took on the cones. Sound the bell, it's no contest: The winner is the Mustang GT."
"Overall the Musang backs up its looks with a handling performance that puts to shame the GTO's. Any minor shortfall at the strip was worth how brightly the Mustang took on the cones. Sound the bell, it's no contest: The winner is the Mustang GT."
Originally posted by PONY XPRESS@January 7, 2005, 7:13 PM
I thought that Stang was a little slow. 5.42 & 14.07@ 100.2.
Or the driver.
I thought that Stang was a little slow. 5.42 & 14.07@ 100.2.
Or the driver.
That said the 400hp GTO is faster in a straight line.
Originally posted by jsaylor+January 7, 2005, 1:20 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jsaylor @ January 7, 2005, 1:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-PONY XPRESS@January 7, 2005, 7:13 PM
I thought that Stang was a little slow. 5.42 & 14.07@ 100.2.
Or the driver.
I thought that Stang was a little slow. 5.42 & 14.07@ 100.2.
Or the driver.
That said the 400hp GTO is faster in a straight line. [/b][/quote]
I did mean that particular 05" was off the pace. My auto did a 5.35 stock when I timed it. On one of these boards there is a guy turning 13.2 stock. That's almost a second. Was it the day, the car, or driver?
<center>
</center>
And All this with an Antiquated Solid Rear Axle!
<center>
</center>
"Sound the bell, it's no contest: The winner is the Mustang GT."
"Any minor shortfall at the strip was worth how brightly the Mustang took on the cones."
And All this with an Antiquated Solid Rear Axle!
<center>
</center>




bring it on Goat
wn3d: