Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

MUSTANG GT VS. NEW ECLIPSE GT AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
mustang_lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2005
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
What u guys think who will win??

MUSTANG GT VS. NEW ECLIPSE GT AWD

Will ECLIPSE GT AWD be able to keep up with the MUSTANG GT...both stocks??

Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
With medium throws and easy clutch work, our six-speed Eclipse GT pulled a 6.8-second 0-60 and a 14.9 quarter-mile. Check out our recent sport coupe comparison test and you'll see the Eclipse is faster than the Mazda RX-8, but no match for the Nissan 350Z or Ford Mustang GT.
nuff said. (just like i posted to the v6 vs the eclipse)

EDIT: Sorry if this came off rude lol.

I actually didnt even realize they were releasin the new eclipse for 06, i thought it was comin as an 07
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 05:12 AM
  #3  
bpmurr's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
As far as I know the new Eclipse is only FWD. The Mustang would destroy it. The Eclipse does look like a nice car though. I might have considered one if it was AWD.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #4  
acadian's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Isn't there a section for threads like this?

http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?showforum=42

But I'm sure a Mod will move it.

To answer your question, even if it was AWD, a stock Mustang GT would take a stock Eclipse GT anyday.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #5  
stkdidy's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 7, 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Originally posted by mustang_lover@May 22, 2005, 10:05 PM
With medium throws and easy clutch work, our six-speed Eclipse GT pulled a 6.8-second 0-60 and a 14.9 quarter-mile. Check out our recent sport coupe comparison test and you'll see the Eclipse is faster than the Mazda RX-8, but no match for the Nissan 350Z or Ford Mustang GT.
6.8 0-60 and 14.9 quarter?? anyone else see anything strange bout this? almost 2 sec slower to 60 but less than sec slower to 1/4 than stang? sure has a heck of a lot of top end if u ask me!

anyway, no its no match. and neither is a 350z to a 05 gt, although it is a slightly better matchup
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 06:22 PM
  #6  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally posted by bpmurr@May 23, 2005, 6:15 AM
As far as I know the new Eclipse is only FWD. The Mustang would destroy it. The Eclipse does look like a nice car though. I might have considered one if it was AWD.
That's correct. AWD is not available in the new Eclipse.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
bryman's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 19, 2004
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Another mag got 0-60 in 5.8 on the 6MT GT Eclipse. I think that is a little more accurate, which makes the Eclipse about 0.5-0.8 second slower to 60 than a Mustang GT.
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #8  
Jack Frost's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Originally posted by stkdidy@May 23, 2005, 2:25 PM
anyway, no its no match. and neither is a 350z to a 05 gt, although it is a slightly better matchup
'slightly better'?

Latest issue of Motor Trend has an '05 GT vert vs a 350z vert.

The GT just squeaked past the 350z in 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

But the 350z danced around the GT in slalom and skid pad tests.

Motor Trend picked the 350z as the 'better sports car'...but had the Mustang GT coming out on top overall because of it's 'character'.
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 07:22 AM
  #9  
mr-mstng's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 4
From: NE PA
moving to "which is better"
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #10  
TerpGT17's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Jack Frost@May 24, 2005, 9:02 AM
'slightly better'?

Latest issue of Motor Trend has an '05 GT vert vs a 350z vert.

The GT just squeaked past the 350z in 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

But the 350z danced around the GT in slalom and skid pad tests.

Motor Trend picked the 350z as the 'better sports car'...but had the Mustang GT coming out on top overall because of it's 'character'.
The reason the Z handles significantly better than the Stang vert is because the suspension on the vert is softened significantly from the coupe. Take a look at the numbers between the 2 coupe versions, the handling is nearly even and the Stang is quicker in a straight line.
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 03:00 PM
  #11  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
The back seat is about 3" away from the front seat. Nice!


Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
Super Sonic Blue Mustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 24, 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
As far as looks well the Mustang is way better hands down. 263 H.P. in the Eclipse and the last time I checked 300 H.P. beats that. The only thing it has going for it is that it is lighter then the GT.
Reply
Old May 24, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #13  
BlueSuperGoat's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 19, 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
I'm sorry guys...is the thread starter serious? This should not even be a question. Mustang. Hands down.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #14  
dontmatr's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: FL
Originally posted by Super Sonic Blue Mustang@May 24, 2005, 10:12 PM
As far as looks well the Mustang is way better hands down. 263 H.P. in the Eclipse and the last time I checked 300 H.P. beats that. The only thing it has going for it is that it is lighter then the GT.
Actually, looking at several sources, the '06 Eclipse GT weighs in at 3472lb , making it just as heavy as a Mustang GT.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 05:38 AM
  #15  
VintagMustang302's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 9, 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
I don't know how an all wheel drive car is better for drag race applications? There has to be a considerable loss of power in the drive train.

Also there is a dependability issue too like independent suspension rear ends.

By the way my brother has a 05 GT and he test drove the new Eclipse the other day and said that the car didn't have the pull like his Stang does. Not to mention the rumble of a V8.

Eclipse has 263 HP and 260 Torque V6

Mustang GT 300 HP and 320 Torque V8

Nissan 360Z 300 HP and 260 Torque V6

"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races" - Carroll Shelby
Fortunately The Mustang has everything style, HP, and Torque. So the Mustang GT wins no matter how you slice it.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 05:43 AM
  #16  
ekessler507's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 4, 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Caught a review of the Ecplise on Car & Driver TV over the weekend. The average MPG for the V6 Eclipse was 16. That sucks! :notnice: My wife's GT Vert gets that.


EK
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark0006
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
15
Sep 8, 2023 09:46 AM
Andy11859
Which is Better
4
Sep 10, 2015 12:07 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
Jul 20, 2015 06:26 AM
dohc97
2010-2014 Mustang
2
Jul 19, 2015 07:29 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
3
Jul 17, 2015 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM.