I don't mean to overstep my bounds here mods so I apologize if I do so.

That being said, I've noticed a lot of odd comparisons lately. Example, "Nissan Skyline GT-R vs. S197 Mustang."

First of all these cars are in two totally different performance, drivetrain, and not to mention cars that are not even in existence yet.

Second of all we seem to then have people go off on tangents of "with so and so amount of cash that I save from buying car A over car B I can thus make car A as fast as car B." No, no, no, no.... This is not the point. The point is comparing the car not the money and what one can do with it.

And lastly, if I want to compare a Festiva to a Gallardo I really don't have to make up a ridiculous post because I can figure out the logical answer myself.

That being said can we please, please, PLEASE keep the comparison more relative.

My rant is done. Have a nice evening everyone and I am sorry if I offended anyone for it was not my intention to do so.

Andy

 

But a Gallardo costs $150000. If I dropped $145000 into the motor of a Fiestiva, I bet I could beat the Lambo.

 

quote
That being said can we please, please, PLEASE keep the comparison more relative



ummmmm No!!

 

I agree, the whole money thing gets alittle old. But, if we can't compare cars that are in different classes than what is "which is better" for exactly. What cars can we compare the mustang with, that is in the same class? What fun is it to compare cars that are not 'different'?

 

yeah i agree, What fun is it to compare cars that are not 'different'?