There were some gorgeous musclecars built throughout the years but these cars aren't them...

AMC S/C Rambler

Stripes anyone?

1968 Buick GS

That droopy body line is awful...

1974 Pontiac GTO

Just let it die already!

Yes, there's more out there... let's see your picks! B)

 

The Mustang 2 was bad. Also, I really dislike the new GTO although some will say it isnt that bad.

 

i never could like the 71+ mustang

 

why i oughta....
look at this beaut

 

i love the 71+...::drifts back off to his dream::

any way, the UGLIEST muscle car IMO was late cougar. 71 was that ugly redesign rite? but from 67-70 they rocked

 

Any of the Novas in the same bodystyle as the GTO above. Those things are a design nightmare. Hate em. Pure grandma car.
-J

 

71-73 cougars exept the 18 made in 71 with 429's.......(uncle has 1 in shop.....its goin 2 b on "my classic car")
and the amx

 

I never liked Nova and early GTO.

 

i dont like the 74 to 86 mustangs. but thats just me.

 

Why I oughtta......Look at this GORGEOUS 86.......

 

I never liked ANYTHING made by GM

 

lol too funny i despise 70+ camaros though...

 

Hey, at least you admit it is a muscle car...that is a step in the right direction. B)

 

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueSuperGoat@February 16, 2005, 8:00 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-muscleman

Hey, at least you admit it is a muscle car...that is a step in the right direction. B)

Quoted post

[/quote]
not a muscle car by definition. so HA HA! to be a muscle car it has to have 10hp to 100 pounds and the GTO has 350hp and weighs some where around 4000 pounds. so it is NOT a muscle car by definition.

 

wouldn't say that...the galaxie wheighed 3700 pounds and had 300 horsepower...a muscle car is "muscle" or "brute" I wouldnt call the GTO a muscle car because they didnt call tghe mustang or the GTO muscle cars when they were made...that term came in the mid-70's they were just sports cars when they were made

 

AMC-AMX?

 

Technically, our beloved non SE stangs are not muscle cars. THat was the specs I Found. i did my research this time

 

not a muscle car by definition. so HA HA! to be a muscle car it has to have 10hp to 100 pounds and the GTO has 350hp and weighs some where around 4000 pounds. so it is NOT a muscle car by definition.
[/b][/quote]

I have never seen that definition. That is news to me. Who decided that? The muscle car gods? I will have to check my websters dictionary.

 

cars prior to 74 were rated Gross...which is less than Net due to less restrictions, so if we measured muscle cars in Net some of us would be dissapointed, another way to look at it is like the 74-78 5.0 liter mustangs probably made 180 horsepower(which isnt a lot but its better than 140...)

 

Suprised no one has mentioned the '04-'05 GTO....which looks like a bloated Grand AM which looks like a smaller, fatter Grand Prix which looks like an uglier Bonneville which looks like ............