Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics
View Poll Results: 86 IROC or 87 GN
86 IROC-Z 5.7 350 auto
9.23%
87 Grand National 3.8SFI Turbo Intercooled auto
90.77%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

IROC vs. GN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/9/06, 08:35 PM
  #1  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
2005GTDELUXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 12, 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IROC vs. GN

86 IROC-Z 350 V8 TPI auto or 87 Grand National 3.8 V6 Turbo Intercooled.
Attached Thumbnails IROC vs. GN-tmsiroc.jpg   IROC vs. GN-tmsgn.jpg  
Old 6/9/06, 09:26 PM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
shatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Grand National can be made to make insane amounts of horsepower so I have to give it the nod over the IROC.
Old 6/9/06, 09:32 PM
  #3  
Post *****
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,154
Received 72 Likes on 65 Posts
Grand National
Old 6/9/06, 09:34 PM
  #4  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buying, selling, racing ... ???

Grand National all the way.
Old 6/9/06, 09:58 PM
  #5  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
2005GTDELUXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 12, 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Red Star
Buying, selling, racing ... ???

Grand National all the way.
good point..when i had the GN I got 9 points on my license and one more ticket at the time i woulda lost it. The IROC was stolen from me after 6 months.
Old 6/10/06, 08:27 AM
  #6  
Mach 1 Member
 
mudshuvel319's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 2, 2006
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The GN is a lot faster, but it's much more expensive. A GN in good cond. and 80-90k miles generally goes for around 12-15 grand. A similar IROC will be $3,000-$4,000.
Old 6/10/06, 08:52 AM
  #7  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Grand National!
Old 6/10/06, 09:04 AM
  #8  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I had a 86 Grand National and it would blow the doors off an 86 IROC. I speak from direct personal experience. Strickly a car for going fast in a straight line though.
Old 6/10/06, 11:38 AM
  #9  
I'm people, and I like.
 
Lalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasnt the GNX faster than the Corvette of the same year?
Old 6/10/06, 01:04 PM
  #10  
Cobra Member
 
ScottyBoy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: BC
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shatter
The Grand National can be made to make insane amounts of horsepower so I have to give it the nod over the IROC.
I gotta take the GN too. My mechanics teacher from last year is getting an engine built for his from Nashville with 2400hp.
Old 6/10/06, 01:06 PM
  #11  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by thezeppelin8
Wasnt the GNX faster than the Corvette of the same year?
Yeah the GNX with 275hp was faster then the vette of that year.

found some stats on the GNX. 0-60: 5.5 1/4 mile: 13.43@103 pretty awesome.
Old 6/13/06, 04:03 PM
  #12  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
2005GTDELUXE's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 12, 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GNX,
The Grand National and engine that was also available on the T-type was fast as all ....so for standard GN/T-type what hp?
GNX compares more to 89 Trans Am Indi pace car Turbo IMO.
The IROC has the big 5.7. both were rockets..
edit-if you had a grand national that was cool, but if you have a GNX you were hooked up above the GN.

Originally Posted by Knight
Yeah the GNX with 275hp was faster then the vette of that year.

found some stats on the GNX. 0-60: 5.5 1/4 mile: 13.43@103 pretty awesome.
Old 7/1/06, 08:23 AM
  #13  
Member
 
RedneckPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GNX for the win! .....The GNX is my dream car......sorry ford..
Old 7/1/06, 08:51 AM
  #14  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
karman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,907
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by RedneckPony
GNX for the win! .....The GNX is my dream car......sorry ford..
I loved it too, but my car is just as fast with no turbo and out handles it on the curves.
Old 7/12/06, 03:38 PM
  #15  
Member
 
BLUE OVAL NUTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 8, 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by karman
I loved it too, but my car is just as fast with no turbo and out handles it on the curves.
You can tell by my name i love the Blue Oval , but i'm going to be real with this question. A friend of mine had a GN back in 87' and he payed his notes and insurance by taking down Iroc's and Stangs at will back then. The only times he lost was when he stepped out of his class against built smallblocks/big block street machines. Hell i wanted one back then but the money just wasn't there.
Old 7/12/06, 08:03 PM
  #16  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 more for the Grand National. If I couldn't get a Mustang, it would have been this car. (Actually prefer the T-Types since they're basically the same thing - maybe a little more rare). '86~'87 best years. I recall something about GM being "quiet" back then about the fact that the GN could kill a Corvette in a straight line...
Old 7/12/06, 08:13 PM
  #17  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GN is better. Way better
Old 7/12/06, 08:34 PM
  #18  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
con sarnit!!! i clicked the wrong bubble!!! argh!!!

GN all the way.
Old 7/22/06, 05:02 PM
  #19  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At that time, the GN couldn't be beat by any other stock vehicle. I personally watched a GN burn everything including the vettes on a regular basis. I had an '86 GT at the time, and with those horrid 2.86 stock gears, I didn't do too badly against the GN, but it was not to be.
Old 7/26/06, 09:36 AM
  #20  
Member
 
markboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 24, 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have owned my'86 GN since new, and I love the car....I had an '84 GN before that, and it was also fun, just not the Brute the 86-87's are,,,

Like a previous post, used GN's are $15k...Iroc about $3-4k...

The GN is really easy to work on, and parts are pretty easy to find, but not like a small block chevy...

The only problem with the GN..is everybody want s to race you...and you have to ignore the wanna be's.......

Buick GN= great car,....years ahead of most cars...


Quick Reply: IROC vs. GN



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.