Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

Car and Driver - Mustang beats GTO

Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
Red Baron's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
I received the new Car and Driver magazine today. The cover story is the Mustang GT versus Pontiac GTO!

It has a really cool cover on it. I'd scan it, but my scanner is down. :angry: Anyway, to cut to the chase, Car and Driver prefers the Mustang over the GTO, even though the GTO they tested is the 05 with 400 hp and 400 lb/ft of torque. As far as speed is concerned, the GTO is faster, though. In the quarter-mile, the GTO is 13.3 @ 107mph and the Mustang is 13.8 @ 103. We need just a little more juice Ford!!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #2  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
I still say considering they're sporting an additional 70CID and a supposed 100hp advantage, this is still very close.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
Giddyup's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 1:23 PM
I received the new Car and Driver magazine today. The cover story is the Mustang GT versus Pontiac GTO!

It has a really cool cover on it. I'd scan it, but my scanner is down. :angry: Anyway, to cut to the chase, Car and Driver prefers the Mustang over the GTO, even though the GTO they tested is the 05 with 400 hp and 400 lb/ft of torque. As far as speed is concerned, the GTO is faster, though. In the quarter-mile, the GTO is 13.3 @ 107mph and the Mustang is 13.8 @ 103. We need just a little more juice Ford!!
The Mustang may only be .5 behind in the 1/4 mile.......but we are LIGHTYEARS ahead of the 'Goat' in the aesthetics department. All this works fine with me......WE LOVE OUR STANGS, and GM can take a hike back to the drawing board. B)
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #4  
John H's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2004
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 3
From: Monroe, NC
Once again, this proves there's more to a car's success than horsepower. The Mustang lagged behind the F-body cars for years in the HP wars, but look who's still standing. :headbang:
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #5  
Red Baron's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Yeah - the Stang rules! I agree with the article. The 400hp may make the GTO faster NOW (the 05 Mustang can beat an 04 GTO, is my understanding), but the Mustang beats it in every other dept. - especially styling! There's no comparison overall between them, that's why they can't give away GTO's and Mustang's are averaging only 2 hours on dealer lots! Mustang will sell in one month what GTO sold all last year!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:42 PM
  #6  
PeterPienaar's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Additionally, at least 13.5's have been documented. So we're a bit closer than that. (Of course, the Goat could be faster than they ran, too, so it doesn't prove anything.)
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #7  
mustang_sallad's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
sweet! what do they say as far as handling goes?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #8  
ustabawannab's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 14, 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, WI
Don't forget, no guzzler tax on the Stangs!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:47 PM
  #9  
hiznherponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: September 3, 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful New Hampshire!!!
Yep, yet again GM has a car w/ more cubic inches and HP that can post better times stock, and they still can't beat us in customer loyalty or just plain old good looks!!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #10  
Red Baron's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2004
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #11  
holderca1's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally posted by ustabawannab@December 2, 2004, 3:49 PM
Don't forget, no guzzler tax on the Stangs!
That only applies to the Automatic GTO, the manual does not have the tax.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #12  
Galaxie's Avatar
I Have Admin Envy
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,740
Likes: 1
scan the article for those too cheap to buy it issue
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:29 PM
  #13  
GhostTX's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2004
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 2
From: Sherman, TX
That 0.5s works out to be around 90' between the GTO and the Mustang when the GTO crossed the 1/4 mi mark....if I did my math right.

1/2 second short time...90' pretty big gap.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
RottenRonny's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Galaxie@December 2, 2004, 4:19 PM
scan the article for those too cheap to buy it issue
Yes. Every spare penny is going into the savings account, to put down on the new stang!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #15  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
103 is a pretty decent trap speed. The new LS2 GTO is about equal to LS1 F-bodies. With some mods, we should be able to take out LS2 GTOs.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #16  
ZRX4ME's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
mustang's got looks &handling, just add a tune,exhaust and intake and your even with or ahead of a '05 GTO power wise.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 04:28 PM
  #17  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:43 PM
Yeah - the Stang rules! I agree with the article. The 400hp may make the GTO faster NOW (the 05 Mustang can beat an 04 GTO, is my understanding), but the Mustang beats it in every other dept. - especially styling! There's no comparison overall between them, that's why they can't give away GTO's and Mustang's are averaging only 2 hours on dealer lots! Mustang will sell in one month what GTO sold all last year!
dont get me wrong, i love the stang as much as the next guy but HP, IMO wasnt the only thing bettr about the GTO. i sat in one at the SF international auto show n i think the shifter felt....sorta...better than the stock GT. but thats it.

BTW anyone else go to the show???
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #18  
Steve's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: September 12, 2004
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
The ONLY way I would even consider a GTO against the '05 Mustang would be if it was cheaper in cost.

But for about $8-10k more for a GTO?

No freakin' way. The GTO is a soul-less design with nothing but a good drivetrain in it.

The '05 Mustang has it all - heritage, design, power, handling, good looks, and most of all, charisma. When you see an '05 Mustang (V6 or V8), you just KNOW it's a Mustang.

When you see a GTO (once you finally realize it IS a GTO and not a Taurus or a Grand Prix soap-bar look alike), you think, "So THAT's a GTO? I never made the connection..."

I wouldn't care if the GTO ran 11's and the Mustang ran what it does.

The Mustang is a car I will be proud to own and others will know what it is. I don't want to own a car (re: a GTO) that I have to tell everyone, "Yeah, it really IS a GTO, can't you see the emblem?".

GTO? No go for me...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:00 PM
  #19  
pony_chief's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Talking

Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:57 PM
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
You mean the crude stick axle that was designed by bean counters beat the sophisticated IRS? Where are all of the IRS-***** now?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #20  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,000
Likes: 0
Originally posted by pony_chief+December 2, 2004, 11:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pony_chief @ December 2, 2004, 11:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:57 PM
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
You mean the crude stick axle that was designed by bean counters beat the sophisticated IRS? Where are all of the IRS-***** now? [/b][/quote]
Here here!! Congrats Ford and good job Hau! Exactly as he said.....it's a great setup.

Seriously, I'm here (old C/T "IRS ****").

I want a bumper sticker...."Supporting the 3-link since day 1." Solid axle strength with IRS equivalent handling. Does it get any better than that? I think not.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.