Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

Car and Driver - Mustang beats GTO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/2/04, 02:20 PM
  #1  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
Red Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I received the new Car and Driver magazine today. The cover story is the Mustang GT versus Pontiac GTO!

It has a really cool cover on it. I'd scan it, but my scanner is down. :angry: Anyway, to cut to the chase, Car and Driver prefers the Mustang over the GTO, even though the GTO they tested is the 05 with 400 hp and 400 lb/ft of torque. As far as speed is concerned, the GTO is faster, though. In the quarter-mile, the GTO is 13.3 @ 107mph and the Mustang is 13.8 @ 103. We need just a little more juice Ford!!
Old 12/2/04, 02:21 PM
  #2  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I still say considering they're sporting an additional 70CID and a supposed 100hp advantage, this is still very close.
Old 12/2/04, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Cobra R Member
 
Giddyup's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 10, 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 1:23 PM
I received the new Car and Driver magazine today. The cover story is the Mustang GT versus Pontiac GTO!

It has a really cool cover on it. I'd scan it, but my scanner is down. :angry: Anyway, to cut to the chase, Car and Driver prefers the Mustang over the GTO, even though the GTO they tested is the 05 with 400 hp and 400 lb/ft of torque. As far as speed is concerned, the GTO is faster, though. In the quarter-mile, the GTO is 13.3 @ 107mph and the Mustang is 13.8 @ 103. We need just a little more juice Ford!!
The Mustang may only be .5 behind in the 1/4 mile.......but we are LIGHTYEARS ahead of the 'Goat' in the aesthetics department. All this works fine with me......WE LOVE OUR STANGS, and GM can take a hike back to the drawing board. B)
Old 12/2/04, 02:40 PM
  #4  
Cobra Member
 
John H's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 6, 2004
Location: Monroe, NC
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Once again, this proves there's more to a car's success than horsepower. The Mustang lagged behind the F-body cars for years in the HP wars, but look who's still standing. :headbang:
Old 12/2/04, 02:40 PM
  #5  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
Red Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah - the Stang rules! I agree with the article. The 400hp may make the GTO faster NOW (the 05 Mustang can beat an 04 GTO, is my understanding), but the Mustang beats it in every other dept. - especially styling! There's no comparison overall between them, that's why they can't give away GTO's and Mustang's are averaging only 2 hours on dealer lots! Mustang will sell in one month what GTO sold all last year!
Old 12/2/04, 02:42 PM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
PeterPienaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 25, 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Additionally, at least 13.5's have been documented. So we're a bit closer than that. (Of course, the Goat could be faster than they ran, too, so it doesn't prove anything.)
Old 12/2/04, 02:45 PM
  #7  
Cobra R Member
 
mustang_sallad's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sweet! what do they say as far as handling goes?
Old 12/2/04, 02:46 PM
  #8  
GT Member
 
ustabawannab's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 14, 2004
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 157
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget, no guzzler tax on the Stangs!
Old 12/2/04, 02:47 PM
  #9  
Team Mustang Source
 
hiznherponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2004
Location: Beautiful New Hampshire!!!
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, yet again GM has a car w/ more cubic inches and HP that can post better times stock, and they still can't beat us in customer loyalty or just plain old good looks!!
Old 12/2/04, 02:54 PM
  #10  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
Red Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
Old 12/2/04, 03:03 PM
  #11  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
holderca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by ustabawannab@December 2, 2004, 3:49 PM
Don't forget, no guzzler tax on the Stangs!
That only applies to the Automatic GTO, the manual does not have the tax.
Old 12/2/04, 03:16 PM
  #12  
I Have Admin Envy
 
Galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
scan the article for those too cheap to buy it issue
Old 12/2/04, 03:29 PM
  #13  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
GhostTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 10, 2004
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 2,585
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That 0.5s works out to be around 90' between the GTO and the Mustang when the GTO crossed the 1/4 mi mark....if I did my math right.

1/2 second short time...90' pretty big gap.
Old 12/2/04, 03:38 PM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
RottenRonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Galaxie@December 2, 2004, 4:19 PM
scan the article for those too cheap to buy it issue
Yes. Every spare penny is going into the savings account, to put down on the new stang!
Old 12/2/04, 03:40 PM
  #15  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
103 is a pretty decent trap speed. The new LS2 GTO is about equal to LS1 F-bodies. With some mods, we should be able to take out LS2 GTOs.
Old 12/2/04, 04:22 PM
  #16  
Bullitt Member
 
ZRX4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustang's got looks &handling, just add a tune,exhaust and intake and your even with or ahead of a '05 GTO power wise.
Old 12/2/04, 04:28 PM
  #17  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:43 PM
Yeah - the Stang rules! I agree with the article. The 400hp may make the GTO faster NOW (the 05 Mustang can beat an 04 GTO, is my understanding), but the Mustang beats it in every other dept. - especially styling! There's no comparison overall between them, that's why they can't give away GTO's and Mustang's are averaging only 2 hours on dealer lots! Mustang will sell in one month what GTO sold all last year!
dont get me wrong, i love the stang as much as the next guy but HP, IMO wasnt the only thing bettr about the GTO. i sat in one at the SF international auto show n i think the shifter felt....sorta...better than the stock GT. but thats it.

BTW anyone else go to the show???
Old 12/2/04, 05:34 PM
  #18  
Team Mustang Source
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 12, 2004
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ONLY way I would even consider a GTO against the '05 Mustang would be if it was cheaper in cost.

But for about $8-10k more for a GTO?

No freakin' way. The GTO is a soul-less design with nothing but a good drivetrain in it.

The '05 Mustang has it all - heritage, design, power, handling, good looks, and most of all, charisma. When you see an '05 Mustang (V6 or V8), you just KNOW it's a Mustang.

When you see a GTO (once you finally realize it IS a GTO and not a Taurus or a Grand Prix soap-bar look alike), you think, "So THAT's a GTO? I never made the connection..."

I wouldn't care if the GTO ran 11's and the Mustang ran what it does.

The Mustang is a car I will be proud to own and others will know what it is. I don't want to own a car (re: a GTO) that I have to tell everyone, "Yeah, it really IS a GTO, can't you see the emblem?".

GTO? No go for me...
Old 12/2/04, 08:00 PM
  #19  
Member
 
pony_chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally posted by Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:57 PM
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
You mean the crude stick axle that was designed by bean counters beat the sophisticated IRS? Where are all of the IRS-***** now?
Old 12/2/04, 08:05 PM
  #20  
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 5,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by pony_chief+December 2, 2004, 11:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pony_chief @ December 2, 2004, 11:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Red Baron@December 2, 2004, 3:57 PM
As far as handling - the brakes are better in the GTO (braking 70 - 0 feet, 167 feet in GTO, 170 in Mustang). Skidpad is better for the Mustang (0.89 versus 0.88). Lane change is better in the Mustang, too (64.7 mph versus 62.9).
You mean the crude stick axle that was designed by bean counters beat the sophisticated IRS? Where are all of the IRS-***** now? [/b][/quote]
Here here!! Congrats Ford and good job Hau! Exactly as he said.....it's a great setup.

Seriously, I'm here (old C/T "IRS ****").

I want a bumper sticker...."Supporting the 3-link since day 1." Solid axle strength with IRS equivalent handling. Does it get any better than that? I think not.


Quick Reply: Car and Driver - Mustang beats GTO



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 PM.