Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

Auto vs. Manual 0-60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/17/04, 10:27 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DeathMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been lookin around my area for a 99-02 Mustang GT, but all I can seem to find are automatics. My question is, is there much difference at all between the auto and manual, speedwise? Like for my 02 Cougar, it's an auto and the difference between that and the manual is like 2 seconds 0-60 which really sucks.
Old 6/18/04, 12:07 AM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, autos are usually 1-2 seconds slower.

I always check modernracer.com they have a lot of 0-60 times, 99-04GT they have 6.1....someone in this forum quoted me 5.3-5.6, but I guarantee the auto will be high 6's if not 7's. :nono:


Try autotrader.com, which will find local dealers....then you visit. I still don't believe in carmax.com, their selection sucks.

Also cars.com , their selection is good also.
Old 6/18/04, 02:56 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DeathMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I checked those. Guess there is just a shortage of manuals in my area..
Old 6/18/04, 03:31 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DeathMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found a 99 Cobra 5 spd, but it has 66k miles and it's at one of those tiny dealerships, called Classic Motorcars.. my dad always says he doesn't trust those small shops, cause the cars they sell are usually ones that the big dealerships couldnt sell.. Is that true?
Old 6/18/04, 04:04 PM
  #5  
V6 Member
 
DarkStallion2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 12, 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, it seems magazine always over shoot the specs on Mustangs. The M5 GT's do not take six plus seconds to hit 60...believe me LoL. I'd say about a 5.3-5.6 with the autos lacking severely at anywhere from a 5.9-6.5 (just a guess as I'd never own one)
Old 6/18/04, 06:40 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DeathMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, 5.9 to 6.5 is plenty fast for me. My Cougar is rated at mid 9's 0-60. Thats like, truck territory heh.
Old 6/19/04, 11:13 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the price on that 99 Cobra?
Old 6/20/04, 04:58 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
DeathMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sticker price is $14,995.
Old 6/20/04, 11:35 PM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by DeathMetal@June 18, 2004, 3:34 PM
I found a 99 Cobra 5 spd, but it has 66k miles and it's at one of those tiny dealerships, called Classic Motorcars.. my dad always says he doesn't trust those small shops, cause the cars they sell are usually ones that the big dealerships couldnt sell.. Is that true?
If you are SERIOUS about the car......I would get the VIN number and check it out at carfax.com or something else.


If I'm correct they report any damage or repairs done to the car. At least that's what I've been told.

Also just as a guide....I'd TRY to stay away from cars with that many miles on it. Cobras are meant to be driven so I'm sure that they've been floored more than once. They might be abused more than you think, also don't just grab a car because it's available.
Old 6/22/04, 12:24 PM
  #10  
Cobra Member
 
scottie1113's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 14, 2004
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless you're a hard core 1/4 mile guy, you won't notice much difference between the stick and the auto. Mine's plenty fast for the street and highway and that's all that matters to me. And no, I don't street race.

Of course, I'm a lot older than you guys, which has a lot to do with it.
Old 6/23/04, 01:02 AM
  #11  
V6 Member
 
The_Wretched's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustang autos suck... they are way slower than the stick counterpart. if it was an lt-1 or ls1 auto then get it... but a auto stang sucks for both 1/4 and top end racing...
Old 6/23/04, 10:10 AM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
Scootr's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Tallmadge OH
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by The_Wretched@June 23, 2004, 3:05 AM
mustang autos suck... they are way slower than the stick counterpart. if it was an lt-1 or ls1 auto then get it... but a auto stang sucks for both 1/4 and top end racing...
I have an auto an it's plenty fast enough for what I use it for(daily driver).As mentioned in a prior post,I don't race mine either,so it's not like I need the extra second. For the last poster that said "Mustang auto's suck"...are you basing that on your V-6 Mustang? :scratch:
Old 6/23/04, 10:51 AM
  #13  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Kluski's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Unhappy

I live in Pittsburgh and there are lots of hills and stop lights on hills. Everyone says to get an automatic instead of replacing clutches. I would love to buy a GT w/ stick shift, but am having too many doubts put in my head. Any thoughts or support...

Also, I see people expressing the dislike for the spolier on the new Stang. I do not know much about the aerodynamics of cars, but what makes it better to be without a spoiler.
Old 6/23/04, 11:10 AM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
Scootr's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Tallmadge OH
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Kluski@June 23, 2004, 12:54 PM
I live in Pittsburgh and there are lots of hills and stop lights on hills. Everyone says to get an automatic instead of replacing clutches. I would love to buy a GT w/ stick shift, but am having too many doubts put in my head. Any thoughts or support...

Also, I see people expressing the dislike for the spolier on the new Stang. I do not know much about the aerodynamics of cars, but what makes it better to be without a spoiler.
Don't get me wrong,manual is a lot of fun. The one I test drove was pretty stiff in comparison to the jeep I had. I have a lot of stop and go on the way to work as well,not to mention I just had surgery on my left knee last Fri. So it's auto only for me from here on out.
Old 6/23/04, 11:26 AM
  #15  
GT Member
 
UA2k1GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by The_Wretched@June 23, 2004, 1:05 AM
mustang autos suck... they are way slower than the stick counterpart. if it was an lt-1 or ls1 auto then get it... but a auto stang sucks for both 1/4 and top end racing...


no they're not that much slower. 2/10s maybe, but then you factor in drivers (un)ability to drive a stick and the 2/10s difference could be gone. Autos don't miss shifts and are hella consistent if you're bracket racing.
Old 9/25/04, 11:20 PM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
woody1's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 12, 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by UA2k1GT+June 23, 2004, 11:29 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (UA2k1GT @ June 23, 2004, 11:29 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-The_Wretched@June 23, 2004, 1:05 AM
mustang autos stink... they are way slower than the stick counterpart. if it was an lt-1 or ls1 auto then get it... but a auto stang stinks for both 1/4 and top end racing...


no they're not that much slower. 2/10s maybe, but then you factor in drivers (un)ability to drive a stick and the 2/10s difference could be gone. Autos don't miss shifts and are hella consistent if you're bracket racing. [/b][/quote]
B) Also if you get a shift kit and torque converter upgrade it will do better that a stick in the long run and will absoultely NEVER miss a gear
Old 9/26/04, 07:32 AM
  #17  
Team Mustang Source
 
Greywolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2004
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Kluski@June 23, 2004, 10:54 AM
I live in Pittsburgh and there are lots of hills and stop lights on hills. Everyone says to get an automatic instead of replacing clutches. I would love to buy a GT w/ stick shift, but am having too many doubts put in my head. Any thoughts or support...

Also, I see people expressing the dislike for the spolier on the new Stang. I do not know much about the aerodynamics of cars, but what makes it better to be without a spoiler.
The 05 has a new 5spd auto with a better computer it is supposed to be more aggresive shifting. Spoilers are ineffective below about 80 and don't really help till you get in triple digits. My old 89 would get squirelly above 115 with the stock spoiler my friend put a aftermarket on his and droped the suspension 1 inch in front 1.5 in back and it was rock solid. Most of that was probably from the suspension. Most of the dislike for the spoiler is pure looks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gigantor
2005-2009 Mustang
31
5/11/23 07:31 PM
mx5jhb
2005-2009 Mustang
3
9/30/15 04:44 PM
Kalel08
GT
2
9/29/15 03:06 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
9/26/15 11:55 AM



Quick Reply: Auto vs. Manual 0-60



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 AM.