quick answer?
#4
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Originally posted by Rockabilly@July 9, 2005, 2:03 AM
ahh $%&#ing crap
but thank you sir
ahh $%&#ing crap
but thank you sir
#6
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like it when they measure by ci, sometimes they dont even get the Liters right since they are almost always rounded.
But for the 5.0 I guess they chose since it was right in the middle. Do engineers base their measurments by ci or liters now. Like if they made another 5.0 would they make it with 305 ci, or would they just continue the rounding the L values?
But for the 5.0 I guess they chose since it was right in the middle. Do engineers base their measurments by ci or liters now. Like if they made another 5.0 would they make it with 305 ci, or would they just continue the rounding the L values?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gigantor
2005-2009 Mustang
31
5/11/23 07:31 PM