General Mustang Chat Not Model Year Specific

Ponies on The Run (Again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/21/07, 05:59 PM
  #7361  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikes rx
Agreed, although not recommended.
Yeah... autos will heat up the transmission and you are wearing the rear brakes on both autos and manuals.

All I hurt doing that was the tires. And they really don't look much different now than they did before doing it. It looks like a lot of rubber on the ground, but it really isn't.
Old 3/21/07, 06:01 PM
  #7362  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
I've done it a few times like that. It takes a certain amount of practice to get it right, without lurching the car forward too much.
Yes, it does take practice. With a line lock, it's just too darn easy.
Old 3/21/07, 06:01 PM
  #7363  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LEO_06GT
Why wouldn't you be able to?? How would guys at the track heat up they're tires then? There's very few of them that have line locks.
It's really no different than powerbraking. Most of your brake power comes from the front end, so you aren't hurting the rears that much, once you're spinning.
Old 3/21/07, 06:03 PM
  #7364  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
It's really no different than powerbraking. Most of your brake power comes from the front end, so you aren't hurting the rears that much, once you're spinning.
Yep... it's just being able to get on the brake quick enough. You'll see them go forward a little bit while they are getting their foot on the brake. Where I didn't move forward even an inch.
Old 3/21/07, 06:06 PM
  #7365  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Line locks are great for the track. I had one on my Camaro when I was racing. Just pop it in second, hold the button, give it a good rev and dump the clutch in the wetbox....good to go!
Old 3/21/07, 06:07 PM
  #7366  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And here's a pic other than in my driveway! It was a cool location - I'm going to take the '06 there for some pictures. No burn-outs, though.

Attachment 22108
Attached Thumbnails Ponies on The Run (Again)-dscn5299.jpg  
Old 3/21/07, 06:11 PM
  #7367  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 89Trooper
And here's a pic other than in my driveway! It was a cool location - I'm going to take the '06 there for some pictures. No burn-outs, though.

Attachment 22108
Geez I remember getting pulled over by one of those, when the Washington state patrol was still using them. The 5.0 interceptors were not to be messed with.
Old 3/21/07, 06:11 PM
  #7368  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
Geez I remember getting pulled over by one of those, when the Washington state patrol was still using them. The 5.0 interceptors were not to be messed with.
And they only had 225HP... not 400!

Attachment 22109
Attached Thumbnails Ponies on The Run (Again)-dscn3743.jpg  
Old 3/21/07, 06:17 PM
  #7369  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I remember, not alot of the Troopers cared for them too much, but they would outrun and handle most of the cars in the area at the time. 225 hp was a hell of alot more than the little Datsun pickup I was driving at the time had. Nothing wrong with 400!!!
Old 3/21/07, 06:20 PM
  #7370  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
From what I remember, not alot of the Troopers cared for them too much,
I think a lot of them thought they were too small, and too light.
Old 3/21/07, 06:25 PM
  #7371  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 89Trooper
I think a lot of them thought they were too small, and too light.
You might be right there. The LX's were alot quicker than the GT, due to not having all the extra ground effects. The interceptors were for the most part stock 5.0 motors just a different cam right? I think a oil cooler too.
Old 3/21/07, 06:40 PM
  #7372  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, the more I look and read about that new MGW shifter the more I think about getting in on the group buy. According to George it's gonna be $272 for just the basic kit, and $285 with the stops. He's got a hell of a discount happening with the group buy compaired to what the retail price is gonna be.
Old 3/21/07, 06:43 PM
  #7373  
GTR Member
 
Boltzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 20, 2005
Location: Tampa,FL
Posts: 4,661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks to Bill and his write up ,I have new improved tunes
Old 3/21/07, 06:52 PM
  #7374  
Cobra R Member
 
mikes rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 15, 2007
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
You know, the more I look and read about that new MGW shifter the more I think about getting in on the group buy. According to George it's gonna be $272 for just the basic kit, and $285 with the stops. He's got a hell of a discount happening with the group buy compaired to what the retail price is gonna be.
Well, technically it's the same 15% as he mentioned from the get-go...it's just that the retail price is high, so the $$ off is more.

Personally, I would have preferred it to be about $50 less (making it's retail the same as the others on the market), but given my past experience with his SN95 shifter, I'm sure that the extra money is going to be well worth it.
Old 3/21/07, 06:59 PM
  #7375  
Bullitt Member
 
fxdwg2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 15, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikes rx
Well, technically it's the same 15% as he mentioned from the get-go...it's just that the retail price is high, so the $$ off is more.

Personally, I would have preferred it to be about $50 less (making it's retail the same as the others on the market), but given my past experience with his SN95 shifter, I'm sure that the extra money is going to be well worth it.
Well yeah I agree with the pricing. I'm thinking that the extra features that it has, compaired to the pro 5.0, tri ax and the roush kinda makes it worth it, especially if you get into the group buy.
Old 3/21/07, 07:11 PM
  #7376  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fxdwg2002
You might be right there. The LX's were alot quicker than the GT, due to not having all the extra ground effects. The interceptors were for the most part stock 5.0 motors just a different cam right? I think a oil cooler too.
Same cam, actually. But yes... an oil cooler, special hoses, stuff like that. I don't think anything was even messed with in the computer. A lot of people think the speed-limiter was adjusted higher, but I don't think so.

The car itself had extra bracing, reinforced seats, no underhood insulation, and little things like that, but nothing major.
Old 3/21/07, 11:06 PM
  #7377  
 
TacoBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Boltzman
Thanks to Bill and his write up ,I have new improved tunes
Right on, Chuck!

I imagine running the custom tune is like night and day compared to the stock program.
Old 3/21/07, 11:09 PM
  #7378  
 
TacoBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 89Trooper
Same cam, actually. But yes... an oil cooler, special hoses, stuff like that. I don't think anything was even messed with in the computer. A lot of people think the speed-limiter was adjusted higher, but I don't think so.

The car itself had extra bracing, reinforced seats, no underhood insulation, and little things like that, but nothing major.
I think you're right, extra stuff (bigger radiator too?) to keep it cool during prolong idle.

I know the Highway Patrol chose the Mustang over the Camaro because of the additional ground clearance when jumping curbs and such.
Old 3/21/07, 11:40 PM
  #7379  
Team Mustang Source
 
habu's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 14, 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bill,
You can do the 'powerbraking' with the manual. I'm getting there with mine. The problem, for me at least, is I'm awful busy trying to keep the car somewhat straight, watch the rev-limiter and shift if I have to and then modulate the brakes with my foot so I'm using as little rear braking power as possible. Trust me once you get stop the car from moving forward in 1st, it wants to be sideways real quick.


Tom, loving the burnout remnants pic. I remember when I used to burnout with my 429 Torino I'd have to brush the rubber off the lower qtr panel when I got home before my dad saw it.... hahahaha... those where the days. I love your car, it's 9-ways of awesome !!
Old 3/22/07, 03:51 AM
  #7380  
GTR Member
 
89Trooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBill
I think you're right, extra stuff (bigger radiator too?) to keep it cool during prolong idle.

I know the Highway Patrol chose the Mustang over the Camaro because of the additional ground clearance when jumping curbs and such.
Same skinny 1-core radiator as stock. 130-amp alternator though, instead of the 75-amp stocker.

Yeah, they sat a lot higher than mine with that 4x4 look, again. I took care of that right away.

Originally Posted by habu
Tom, loving the burnout remnants pic. I remember when I used to burnout with my 429 Torino I'd have to brush the rubber off the lower qtr panel when I got home before my dad saw it.... hahahaha... those where the days. I love your car, it's 9-ways of awesome !!
Thanks! I was surprised how easily it brushed off.


Quick Reply: Ponies on The Run (Again)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 PM.