Mustang gets 100 mpg.
Anyone ever heard of the laws of Thermodynamics?
Read this.
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm
Read this.
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm
Anyone ever heard of the laws of Thermodynamics?
Read this.
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm
Read this.
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/fish3.htm
Either his design is...
A. expensive
B. impractical
C. unreliable
Ah... Arrow... you might be on to something. His car is running E85. Therefore only 15% of the fuel is actually gas. I have heard some claims of 133 MPGoG (Miles Per Gallon of Gas) when the car gets 20 MPG on E85.
I liked the 400hp and 500ft/lbs the best. Here is something from another forum.
He claims 110MPGe on E85 ethanol. That "e" is EXTREMELY important! He is claiming 110MPG on GASOLINE, he is conveniently leaving off the other 5 GALLON of ETHANOL consumed along with that 1 gallon of gas.
He gets 16.5 ACTUAL MPG
He gets 16.5 ACTUAL MPG
Found this post when I was search for more info.
This guy needs to be chained to his bastardized 'Stang and dragged down the street. He's not running on pure gasoline yet he's boasting his claims as if he were. He hasn't found some "miracle solution" for making a pure gasoline tank give 110mpg. Of course, the big giveaway is that the dude isn't speaking correctly (intentionally or not). He's saying "110 mpg" when it's actually "110 mpgE". MPGe = MPG Equivalent.
MPGe makes sense...but saying "MPG" is entirely misleading. That said, even a 110 MPGe rating isn't earth shattering. If he had said MPGe at the beginning, he probably wouldn't have made it on any news report.
This guy also needs to pwn up on his performance declarations. I call BS on all of it. Ethanol has been known to perform better in some cars, but not to the extent that it blows the doors off of gas running.
Let's all send huge tons of spam to his email.
Ethanol, well...as long as we keep drinking beer there'll be plenty of that.
Wikipedia: Miles per Gallon of Gasoline Equivalent (MPGe) is a unit of measurement that relates efficiencies of different systems to the traditional unit of measurement for fuel efficiency.
This guy also needs to pwn up on his performance declarations. I call BS on all of it. Ethanol has been known to perform better in some cars, but not to the extent that it blows the doors off of gas running.
Let's all send huge tons of spam to his email.

Ethanol, well...as long as we keep drinking beer there'll be plenty of that.
This guy needs to be chained to his bastardized 'Stang and dragged down the street. He's not running on pure gasoline yet he's boasting his claims as if he were. He hasn't found some "miracle solution" for making a pure gasoline tank give 110mpg. Of course, the big giveaway is that the dude isn't speaking correctly (intentionally or not). He's saying "110 mpg" when it's actually "110 mpgE". MPGe = MPG Equivalent.
MPGe makes sense...but saying "MPG" is entirely misleading. That said, even a 110 MPGe rating isn't earth shattering. If he had said MPGe at the beginning, he probably wouldn't have made it on any news report.
This guy also needs to pwn up on his performance declarations. I call BS on all of it. Ethanol has been known to perform better in some cars, but not to the extent that it blows the doors off of gas running.
Let's all send huge tons of spam to his email.
Ethanol, well...as long as we keep drinking beer there'll be plenty of that.
MPGe makes sense...but saying "MPG" is entirely misleading. That said, even a 110 MPGe rating isn't earth shattering. If he had said MPGe at the beginning, he probably wouldn't have made it on any news report.
This guy also needs to pwn up on his performance declarations. I call BS on all of it. Ethanol has been known to perform better in some cars, but not to the extent that it blows the doors off of gas running.
Let's all send huge tons of spam to his email.

Ethanol, well...as long as we keep drinking beer there'll be plenty of that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ssjbuu
Repair and Service Help
6
Aug 28, 2015 08:55 AM





