Membership numbers
#7
Needs to be more Astony
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
They make over hunderd thousand mustangs a year... so lets say 4-5million mustangs out there. I know thats going off of 100,000 even though they made 1 million in 1965-66.
But still lets say 4 million mustang owners...we got 10,000 members over 2 years....so at this rate tms will have 4 million members in about....800 years...
But still lets say 4 million mustang owners...we got 10,000 members over 2 years....so at this rate tms will have 4 million members in about....800 years...
#8
Post *****
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
yes, but you fail to factor in the fact that the growth of membership isnt a linear function, its more of an exponential function, so each year there are more new members than the previous year, so the rate of change each year is higher than before so it wouldnt take the foull 800 years
:crazy: = arin after Calc
:crazy: = arin after Calc
#9
Originally posted by future9er24@November 16, 2005, 1:17 AM
yes, but you fail to factor in the fact that the growth of membership isnt a linear function, its more of an exponential function, so each year there are more new members than the previous year, so the rate of change each year is higher than before so it wouldnt take the foull 800 years
:crazy: = arin after Calc
yes, but you fail to factor in the fact that the growth of membership isnt a linear function, its more of an exponential function, so each year there are more new members than the previous year, so the rate of change each year is higher than before so it wouldnt take the foull 800 years
:crazy: = arin after Calc
![EEK!](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#10
Post *****
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
that doesnt entirely work unless brad and scot with one T start deleting inactive members. because technically there will always be that many members
for ex: there are well over 10K members registered, but i guarantee you they will never all be on at once
for ex: there are well over 10K members registered, but i guarantee you they will never all be on at once
#11
GTR Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Originally posted by Knight@November 15, 2005, 11:52 AM
But still lets say 4 million mustang owners...we got 10,000 members over 2 years....so at this rate tms will have 4 million members in about....800 years...
But still lets say 4 million mustang owners...we got 10,000 members over 2 years....so at this rate tms will have 4 million members in about....800 years...
![Eyebrow](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/eyebrow.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PonyMuscletang13
2010-2014 Mustang
4
9/29/15 09:40 AM