Off-Topic Chatter Non-Vehicle Related Chat

4:10 gears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 08:26 PM
  #21  
Redfire 05Gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 11, 2004
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by 169stang@March 15, 2005, 3:55 PM
Ahhh! I honestly haven't taken notice to the difference. It's only at 3000 rpm's at 80. What is the rpm's at 80-stock?
2400 rpm
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 03:29 AM
  #22  
tmcolegr's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 634
Likes: 2
Tomorrow I am having my 4.10 gears installed. Most of my driving is around town at speeds of 55 MPH or less.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 04:48 AM
  #23  
CelticNut's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Stadifer@March 15, 2005, 6:41 PM
Yeah gas is slowly find it's new stride. But I won't let the gas prices stop me from doing what I would want to do. When they first spiked I cut back on driving but I said "screw it!" and just increased my gas budget!
I wholeheartedly agree! Life goes on, you just have to work it into your budget. 4:10 gears are a little steep for me; I like to do a lot of highway driving and tend to take long trips. The screaming rear end gears would probably get on my nerves after a while. My '71 Super Bee had 4:56's and they were nearly impossible to live with. Great get-up-and-go though!
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #24  
Redfire 05Gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 11, 2004
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by CelticCub@April 13, 2005, 2:51 AM
I wholeheartedly agree! Life goes on, you just have to work it into your budget. 4:10 gears are a little steep for me; I like to do a lot of highway driving and tend to take long trips. The screaming rear end gears would probably get on my nerves after a while. My '71 Super Bee had 4:56's and they were nearly impossible to live with. Great get-up-and-go though!
The Super Bee probably didn't have overdrive?
4.10's only add about 300-600 rpm to the manual's 3.55's rpm's at highway speeds.
At 60 mph, it's 2100 instead of 1800
70 mph, 2400/2100
80 mph 2400/2800
90 mph 3100/2700
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #25  
Arioch's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 6, 2005
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
According to the instrument display, I'm only getting about 13.5 MPG on my GT. I do have a lead foot, though.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #26  
Redfire 05Gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 11, 2004
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Arioch@April 13, 2005, 9:56 PM
I do have a lead foot, though.
Me too! And I've been down in the 13's with mine also. Today, I'm showing 15.5.
It was 16.8 but it slowly dropped back with city stop-and-go. I don't know how these guys are getting 18-20. Must be more highway than us. I'm averaging anywhere from 23-29 mph.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 04:24 AM
  #27  
CelticNut's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Redfire 05Gt@April 14, 2005, 12:20 AM
The Super Bee probably didn't have overdrive?
4.10's only add about 300-600 rpm to the manual's 3.55's rpm's at highway speeds.
Overdrive? What's that?

The Super Bee orginally came with a 3-speed and 3:55 gears, but by the time I got the car, it sported a Hurst pistol-grip 4-speed shifter with 4:56 gears. I quickly swapped them out for the "street" gears. My buddy has a Road Runner with 4:10's and he manages well with it. The 4:10's are good all-around gears, but I prefer lower ratios for highway cruising.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 01:47 PM
  #28  
drylbrg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 29, 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Funny, I have been having this same argument in my head. My Camaro has 3:73 with a TH400 3 speed. It is OK but would't want to take a long trip in it or use it as a daily driver. The OD tranny should make the 4:10 liveable, but do I want that in my daily driver. Here I go again...
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 02:07 PM
  #29  
dekujala's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2005
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
I'm only getting 17.2 mpg right now, was as low as 14 when first got it, but with more driving its going up, still with the traffic I dont see it going up very fast.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #30  
Redfire 05Gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 11, 2004
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by dekujala@April 15, 2005, 12:10 PM
I'm only getting 17.2 mpg right now, was as low as 14 when first got it, but with more driving its going up, still with the traffic I dont see it going up very fast.
I'm up to 15.8 today.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #31  
softbatch's Avatar
I talk to cones.
 
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
resurecting an old thread, lol.

I did a search and have added 4.10s to the list of initial mods. Sounds like good cheap BUTOMETER Horsepower.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #32  
wild stray's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Good all around for the manual!
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2005 | 10:59 PM
  #33  
Hatchman's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2005
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally posted by wild stray@March 15, 2005, 9:52 PM
I've had mine tuned for a long time and recently had the gears changed. In town only, mileage dropped around 1.5 mpg. Still very decent mileage. I have not yet had an opportunity to take it on the road long enough to get a reading.
Yep, that sounds about right. Went from 3.55 to 4.10 in a previous vehicle, and lost about 1.5 mpg.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 06:47 AM
  #34  
rony1976's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2005
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
at what speeds would you honestly get close to the hwy 25mpg as stated? I usually cruise at 80mph, would I even get close to the 25mpg mark for Hwy?
I was thinking about this today....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:17 AM
  #35  
Lime05owner's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 20, 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Originally posted by rex@March 15, 2005, 5:35 PM
Due to gas prices I hear they are bringing back the Mustang II for 06...


Yeah...it's called the GTO II.....looks like crap with a 1977 Chevette motor in it...



Jay
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #36  
softbatch's Avatar
I talk to cones.
 
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Originally posted by rony1976@June 17, 2005, 7:50 AM
at what speeds would you honestly get close to the hwy 25mpg as stated? I usually cruise at 80mph, would I even get close to the 25mpg mark for Hwy?
I was thinking about this today....
I think highway mileage is based on around 55-65 Mph
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #37  
rony1976's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2005
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
who goes 55-65 on the highway?!?!?! he he he he
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #38  
rony1976's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2005
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
who goes 55-65 on the highway?!?!?! he he he he
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:37 AM
  #39  
darrennye's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 26, 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
My 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 with the HEMI engine gets 11.5 mpg city and 12.5 mpg highway (driving about 80 mph).

I'll be very happy with the difference in my 06 Mustang GT!

Anyone want a black Dodge Ram 1500, still under warranty?

Located in central New Jersey.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 07:40 AM
  #40  
Badsnke98's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 4, 2004
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Originally posted by softbatch@June 17, 2005, 9:26 AM
I think highway mileage is based on around 55-65 Mph

I agree, at higher speeds mileage per gallon will decrease and then depending on headwinds or tailwinds.

I have the 4:10's in my Cobra RPM on that car at 80 is 3,000 was 2,400 with 3:27's.

I wanted 4:10's to easly spin the tires at cruises and to creep down the road at those events. The Woodward Dream Cruise turns into huge parking lot. But for just driving around the 3:27's where better in IMO.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 AM.