Obama pledges to give 4 billion in aid for the big 3
#1
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: April 13, 2006
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Texas
Obama pledges to give 4 billion in aid for the big 3
#6
Yeah, God forbid tax money be used to keep American manufacturing intact, its much better to borrow money from China and use it to pay for keeping a War in the Middle East going for decades.
#7
#8
Sure if you drink the Obama koolaid and don't dig deeper then you think this will solve all the problems.
Look deeper into the auto industry and find out just WHY they are in this position....one part of the equation is the Unions as well as others but sorry I don't feel as though my tax money should bail out a problem that could have been solved long ago. I guess my small business would be eligable to be bailed out by YOUR tax money by our govt. if I didn't manage it properly....would that be acceptable to you?!? I don't care how big a company is....manage it right, fix your own problems....not wait for the govt. to bail you out.
Research and information is a wonderful thing when accessed and read. It's not the Government or taxpayers place to bail out companies...this is one reason the national debt is so high among others....however throwing the cost of the war into a topic that has NOTHING to do with the war is another Obama tactic....I don't recall seeing anything in the title of this thread that even referenced Iraq. This was a topic about a promised Govt. plan to use OUR tax money to bail out publicly traded companies...NOT about the war or how it is financed.
#9
Look deeper into the auto industry and find out just WHY they are in this position....one part of the equation is the Unions as well as others but sorry I don't feel as though my tax money should bail out a problem that could have been solved long ago. I guess my small business would be eligable to be bailed out by YOUR tax money by our govt. if I didn't manage it properly....would that be acceptable to you?!? I don't care how big a company is....manage it right, fix your own problems....not wait for the govt. to bail you out.
And while I admire you for having the acumen to successfully run a small business (or were you just speaking hypothetically?), the facts are that if it collapses tomorrow, the repercussions won't be felt nationally.
Research and information is a wonderful thing when accessed and read. It's not the Government or taxpayers place to bail out companies...this is one reason the national debt is so high among others....however throwing the cost of the war into a topic that has NOTHING to do with the war is another Obama tactic....I don't recall seeing anything in the title of this thread that even referenced Iraq. This was a topic about a promised Govt. plan to use OUR tax money to bail out publicly traded companies...NOT about the war or how it is financed.
Or perhaps you have forgotten the mess that is the deregulated airline industry?
Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; 8/18/08 at 05:44 PM.
#10
SVO, you accused Obama of "typical tax and spend political mentality," implying that its wrong for the government to *gasp* collect taxes and *double-gasp* spend that money. Obama's promising a fair tax burden (nobody making less than $250K pays a dime more, which is 98% of the population) which spends tax revenues in an intelligent way to create new jobs and preserve existing ones, in other words the exact opposite of the current policy which uses borrowed funds in a way which harms our domestic economy.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
#12
I hate to see the Big 3 where they are right now, but they did it to themselves. The same goes for our current issues with consumer debts & mortgage forclosures. Bad decisions, not the government is to blame.
Lastly,what was wrong with deregulating the airline industry? If I think I know where you are going....Since the inception of the airline industry, it's been a bad place to invest your money, let's leave it at that. Southwest is the exception.
Last edited by max2000jp; 8/18/08 at 10:37 PM.
#13
SVO, you accused Obama of "typical tax and spend political mentality," implying that its wrong for the government to *gasp* collect taxes and *double-gasp* spend that money. Obama's promising a fair tax burden (nobody making less than $250K pays a dime more, which is 98% of the population) which spends tax revenues in an intelligent way to create new jobs and preserve existing ones, in other words the exact opposite of the current policy which uses borrowed funds in a way which harms our domestic economy.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
The "rich" already pay 65% of income taxes.
#14
Don't freak out people, but the rich are already over taxed. Congress and Presidency are impotent when it comes to creating jobs outside of government. Novel approach here folks, rich people with capital create jobs. I know it's really out there to some of you, but Bill Clinton didn't give you your job (unless your working at the Little Rock Free Clinic, again supply and demand), in fact you probably have your job despite Bill Clinton. It's probably there because of the tax reforms put in place by Ronald Reagan and JFK to some extent. No more 90% tax brackets making it useless to try to make more money after a certain point, but still protecting Rockefeller's wealth because he already had it. Remember what happened when they placed tax on yachts, domestic yacht industry went down crapper. That's your government at work for you. Now they want to over tax your gasoline company. Do you think this will make your gas cheaper? If you think that you've been sniffing the product a bit much.
So no, no bailout of auto industry. But I'm consistent here, no bailout of farmers, no bailout of mortgages, no bailout of banks, and no bailout of anyone, not even the State of California. Capitalism isn't the guarantee of success, it's the possiblity of failure.
Hollywood you and I have a very fundamental difference that will never be resolved. I believe government should get the heck out of the way. Sure they have their place, military, police, treasury (I guess). Now if you want to list states rights, that's a bit of a bigger list. Just be happy in Canada with your government safety blanket to keep you all nice and cozy at night, we'll be OK here with our market capitalism. Well even it's not true capitalism, but it'll do for the time being.
So no, no bailout of auto industry. But I'm consistent here, no bailout of farmers, no bailout of mortgages, no bailout of banks, and no bailout of anyone, not even the State of California. Capitalism isn't the guarantee of success, it's the possiblity of failure.
Hollywood you and I have a very fundamental difference that will never be resolved. I believe government should get the heck out of the way. Sure they have their place, military, police, treasury (I guess). Now if you want to list states rights, that's a bit of a bigger list. Just be happy in Canada with your government safety blanket to keep you all nice and cozy at night, we'll be OK here with our market capitalism. Well even it's not true capitalism, but it'll do for the time being.
Last edited by 2k7gtcs; 8/18/08 at 11:24 PM.
#16
Yeah, the Big Three are at least 50% responsible for this mess. But debating the whys and wherefores is a bit like closing the barn door after the horse has left. Would you prefer Detroit die? Care to prognosticate on the ramifications of THAT?
And while I admire you for having the acumen to successfully run a small business (or were you just speaking hypothetically?), the facts are that if it collapses tomorrow, the repercussions won't be felt nationally.
All these people who want to see government butt out of everything - I wonder what exactly they think government is SUPPOSED to be for?
Or perhaps you have forgotten the mess that is the deregulated airline industry?
Or perhaps you have forgotten the mess that is the deregulated airline industry?
A quote by the man responsible for Corvette day: “It’s probably not the best use of our time,” he says, “but we have to do something. These resolutions make it look like we’re working.”
Read this:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...4044801AAv5FFw
#17
SVO, you accused Obama of "typical tax and spend political mentality," implying that its wrong for the government to *gasp* collect taxes and *double-gasp* spend that money. Obama's promising a fair tax burden (nobody making less than $250K pays a dime more, which is 98% of the population) which spends tax revenues in an intelligent way to create new jobs and preserve existing ones, in other words the exact opposite of the current policy which uses borrowed funds in a way which harms our domestic economy.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
His proposed actions include some ridiculous ones....like offering a $4,000 rebate check for college students who perform 120 hours of community service...supposedly to pay tuition. Come on...let's be realistic here....a college student that gets a $4,000 windfall check is going to have one hell of a party.....not pay for tuition with it! Granted there might be a few that would but the majority will not. That is wasteful spending. If you want students to do community service then make it for a course credit. This is simply a way for him to "buy" the vote of college students....nothing more.
I'm not saying the system currently is working properly but I know by my research on this guy that he is by FAR not the man for the job.
#18
Well stated!
Where does the bailout end? that's the problem right now...it's one after the other.....
#19
SVO, you accused Obama of "typical tax and spend political mentality," implying that its wrong for the government to *gasp* collect taxes and *double-gasp* spend that money. Obama's promising a fair tax burden (nobody making less than $250K pays a dime more, which is 98% of the population) which spends tax revenues in an intelligent way to create new jobs and preserve existing ones, in other words the exact opposite of the current policy which uses borrowed funds in a way which harms our domestic economy.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
Or the deregulated Energy Industry, or the deregulated Health-Insurance Industry.
This country has a spending problem when it comes to health care because most people don't view it coming out of their own pockets, but it always comes out of our pockets. There are three ways we pay for health care in this country. We buy it ourselves, our companies give us benefits, or the government pays for it. If you buy it you pay for it, if the company gives it to you you still pay for it in lower wages or higher product costs, and if the government pays for it you pay for it in higher taxes. Many people say hey let the government pay for everything. That's fine but you will be looking at tax rates like Germany and France which are just shy of 50%. Even if you are okay with that, they still have to ration care to be able to cover everybody by putting you on waiting lists to see specialists, stopping life saving care like dialysis at age 55, and waiting for the next fiscal cycle because the heart surgeons are not allowed to do anymore surgeries till then. There are many more examples but i will stop. You can deal with the problems we have in our healthcare system now, or you can substitute them for new ones later. Its your choice, so long as you know there will always be problems.
And a fair tax burden will never exist. A fair tax burden would be a national sales tax. If you make more you buy more, you pay more taxes. OFF SOAP BOX NOW.
BACK TO TOPIC
I don't like them bailing ou the companies, but at the same time I shudder to think of the economical ripple the big three's failure would have on this country.