Was reading about it today, no engine, all of the work is to lighten the car and further tuning of the suspension .

 

Nissan's version of the Mustang a " Nis-tang"!

 

Why the heck did they use those generic looking wheels? Blah.

And that exhaust tip change is just as ugly.

I need to see price and specs to be able to justify that ugliness.

 

Most of that car is carbon fiber now right?

 

Leftlane has some info

http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-gt-r-specv.html

 

It cost more than double compared to reguar GT-R. All that for no increase in power?

 

looks good tho.

 

still ugly and unimpressive for a car

 

nice rear tho

 

...but did Nissan resolve the transmission issues? LOL, warning: the transmission will break when driven as designed.

 

there is an aussie after market company that has addressed it

 

They need an Aussie based company to address a transmission issue on something designed and built in Japan!??

 

I forgot how ugly that car is, that just makes it worse

 

More pictures for your viewing pleasure and the cost of said car ... 15,750,000 yen (~$172,840)

http://www.seriouswheels.com/cars/20...GT-R-SpecV.htm

 

wow.

 

Hah! theres all that lightweight stuff people people insist will not significantly increase the price of a car if they use it.

LMAO, just imagine a Mustang GT with the same stuff - "Cool a 3000 pound Mustang GT! Tell me again why it costs 80,000 with a 300hp V8?"