General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

More Camaro Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #41  
crucut's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
I think Chevy blew it. I just really can't get past the front end styling, no matter what kind of lights they end up using. I still think it would have looked better if they had styled it after the 70-72 body.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #42  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by crucut
I still think it would have looked better if they had styled it after the 70-72 body.


Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 05:30 AM
  #43  
exgto's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by crucut
I think Chevy blew it. I just really can't get past the front end styling, no matter what kind of lights they end up using. I still think it would have looked better if they had styled it after the 70-72 body.
Agreed. The split bumper (RS) second generation Camaro was a great looking car.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #44  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
The '70-82 Fbody was more of it's own unique design rather than a Mustang clone.

See the pressed in quarter panel "vents" in front of the rear wheels on the '69 Camaro and on the new 2010 prototypes? I wonder where that idea came from?

Using the '70-82 styling cues but modernizing them would have been more uniquely "Camaro".
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AlphaM1
Tms Members Photo Threads Misc. Years
10
Aug 13, 2025 05:58 AM
kponypower
GT
13
Jun 17, 2020 07:17 AM
DarrenGT
2010-2014 Mustang
33
Apr 2, 2020 11:52 AM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
Apr 28, 2016 05:41 PM
50Cal
Introductions
6
Sep 17, 2015 06:43 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.