General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

IRS vs. Straight Axle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #1  
Autotooner's Avatar
Thread Starter
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Joined: August 6, 2004
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 4
From: Parkersburg, WV
Could someone please tell me the differences between straight (live?) axle and IRS? I have heard stories of both being better, and would like to know the truth. Thanks
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #2  
ManEHawke's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Saying one is better is really based on what it's being applied and how it was engineered. There is not a straight answer on which is better and guys who swear to one probably don't understand how the other one works, or it's potential to be designed very well.
Basically how they work is simple. The solid rear axle is a solid connection on both wheels on each side. the middle part is the pivot point, so when one wheel is going up the other one will push downward. That is the general way in how they all work.
An IRS setup has the center point with two axles, each owning their own pivot point which doesn't affect the other side at all. Enabling both wheels to independantly act on the road surface, and never exert any pressure to the other side.

Theres alot more to it, so I'm leaving alot empty for others to share their inputs.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #3  
Autotooner's Avatar
Thread Starter
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Joined: August 6, 2004
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 4
From: Parkersburg, WV
thanks Manny!
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #4  
Birdman3's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Back in the early days of this forum, there were volumes full of debate on this subject. Since then, due to problems with the service provider, the forum has started over from scratch. I am not sure how much of that debate is on the newer forum database, but I would have to imagine a search would yield a good amount of info for you.
I mention that because most members got so sick of the debate that you may not get many replies on the subject. Happy hunting!
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #5  
Rampant's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
My understanding, in short is as follows:

IRS systems tend to weight more overall, have a lower unsprung weight which allows for softer springs to have the same amount of control over that corner and are much better for handling bumps mid-corner (as only one corner is affected by the bump).

IRS systems are cheaper and much tougher. They are great for handling torque and on a smooth surface, with a good, free-moving design, won't loose much to IRS on the race track (note the Grand-Am FR500Cs) becuase ride isn't a concern.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #6  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
er mike, for that second one, dont u mean 'SRS'
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #7  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Dont forget to add, IRS absorbs more power due to its mechanical complexity.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #8  
Autotooner's Avatar
Thread Starter
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Joined: August 6, 2004
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 4
From: Parkersburg, WV
thanx every1
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
Aug 25, 2021 11:12 AM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
5
Sep 28, 2015 07:39 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:15 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 16, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 AM.