The Honda CR-Z fails as a sports car and as a hybrid...
The Honda CR-Z fails as a sports car and as a hybrid...
I was kinda interested in the Honda CR-Z. A sporty hybrid? Sounds cool. In the real world... eh, not so much.
First, it fails as a sports car. Road and Track tested the CVT-equipped CR-Z, and recorded a 10.5 second 0-60 time. A Prius is faster!
http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...cations_page_2
The 6-speed manual version may be faster, but it can't be by much.
Even worse, it fails as a hybrid. Someone ran a real-world test and barely got over 35 MPG.
http://green.autoblog.com/2010/08/25...ring-125-mile/
So far, the only sporty hybrid that will live up to the hype is the Porsche 918 Spyder... but it's going to cost $600,000...
First, it fails as a sports car. Road and Track tested the CVT-equipped CR-Z, and recorded a 10.5 second 0-60 time. A Prius is faster!

http://www.roadandtrack.com/tests/ca...cations_page_2
The 6-speed manual version may be faster, but it can't be by much.
Even worse, it fails as a hybrid. Someone ran a real-world test and barely got over 35 MPG.
http://green.autoblog.com/2010/08/25...ring-125-mile/
So far, the only sporty hybrid that will live up to the hype is the Porsche 918 Spyder... but it's going to cost $600,000...
Yeah, this CR-Z seems to be neither fish nor fowl, seeming more a car Honda wants to build than a car anybody particularly wants to buy.
Hopefully an Si or R variant is not far off, stuffed with some VTEC screamer and suitable upgraded chassis -- then it might well become a car people want to buy.
Hopefully an Si or R variant is not far off, stuffed with some VTEC screamer and suitable upgraded chassis -- then it might well become a car people want to buy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




