General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

The End of Chrysler...

Old Oct 23, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #41  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Won't GM have to honor Chrysler's lifetime warranty if they took over?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #42  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 626
From: Odenville, AL
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
Won't GM have to honor Chrysler's lifetime warranty if they took over?
I am betting there is some loop hole that will get them out of that one...
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #43  
edumspeed's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 5,670
Likes: 40
From: PR
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
Won't GM have to honor Chrysler's lifetime warranty if they took over?
Don't think they'll keep it on the long run. They'll probably do like "lifetime the first time, then i year the next" kind of thing, like KYB w their shocks.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #44  
exgto's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2006
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
If scrapping Chrysler in order to get their hands on 11 billion is the motive, I'd have serious concerns and objections if I were an elected official. Killing Chrysler and eliminating thousands of jobs for corporate self preservation is highly unethical. It's corporate raiding plain and simple.

I doubt a deal under those terms or immediate possibilities gets done.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 04:56 PM
  #45  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
we shall see, if th deal gets done, i cant see anything else happen....I dont think it's right, im just saying...
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #46  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by jsaylor
This merger tells us a lot about the shape GM is in. Cerberus is dangling the 11 billion dollars that goes with Chrysler like a carrot, and despite the fact that taking on Chrysler is going to make every problematic logistical issue at the General even worse GM is so cash strapped that they just don't care. It looks like GM has resorted to simply gritting their teeth, closing their eyes, and squeezing the trigger on this deal despite what common sense is telling them because they can't come up with a better answer. Perhaps they are hoping that somehow they can manage something so miraculous with that 11 billion dollars that they can dodge (no pun intended) the bullet pulling the trigger on this deal is going to let loose.

That is desperation pure and simple, and says a lot about how close bankruptcy is for GM. Even more tragic, under decent management Chrysler represents a much easier and cheaper fix than GM does since they lack GM's rather severe brand redundancy problem and aren't quite as desperate for cash. Alas, it looks like GM's final major foray into stupidity may be making certain that they don't ride into that dry, dusty sunset alone. What a bunch of ***holes.
I don't know how this will all play out, but I DO agree that GM is on death's doorstep. That said, I doubt the US government will allow GM to die for a whole host of reasons. But I think Chapter 11 and a painful reorganization are almost assuredly in the cards now - with a company that has only three North American marques or so emerging from the ashes.

Meanwhile, did anyone catch this CR story?

Also, Ford is reportedly pulling away from its domestic rivals in the reliability arena with the majority of its models, including Lincoln and Mercury vehicles, now scoring above the industry average.

Last edited by Hollywood_North GT; Oct 23, 2008 at 05:10 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #47  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by exgto
If scrapping Chrysler in order to get their hands on 11 billion is the motive, I'd have serious concerns and objections if I were an elected official. Killing Chrysler and eliminating thousands of jobs for corporate self preservation is highly unethical. It's corporate raiding plain and simple.

I doubt a deal under those terms or immediate possibilities gets done.
With GM strapped for cash so badly that they need Chrysler's $11 Billion to survive, the only logical thing that they would do is to shut down Chrysler, if the merger does go through, since they don't want to have to pay for everything that comes with the deal. Its a sad, sad thing, but this deal is most likely gonna happen.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #48  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
yeah, i agree
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #49  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 2,530
From: Carnegie, PA
Alas, the Challenger will once again not survive long enough to see a second generation.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #50  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
I would think there would be another automobile company interested in purchasing Chrysler....? Other than just GM? I mean with the cash that would go with the deal, it would only make sense that another potential buyer would make a real run at it...
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #51  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 2,530
From: Carnegie, PA
This quote was originally posted on another thread, which addresses that very same question !


Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
My question is this. Why doesn't Ford have an interest in acquiring Chrysler ? Seems to me that such an acquisition would actually benefit Ford in the long run.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #52  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Because Ford doesn't have any money to waste?

How exactly would Ford benefit from buying Chrysler?
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #53  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by Red Star
Because Ford doesn't have any money to waste?

How exactly would Ford benefit from buying Chrysler?
Yes, why would they be buying another company? Ford's been selling off all their aquisitions lately; even Mazda might go.

It's sad to see the state that Chrylser's in now. It's funny but the handwriting's been on the wall for me since the "merger of equals". Daimler went in, dumped all the American management, brought in German management & got the cash they needed at the time. Then the made some really bad decisions, times got tough, and they dumped Mopar, which Cerebrus bought up.

Thanks for destroying Mopar, Daimler. Of course nobody holds Daimler responsible.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #54  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Red Star
How exactly would Ford benefit from buying Chrysler?
+1. Ford has enough on their plate trying to salvage what they have, let alone trying to save another company.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #55  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 2,530
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Red Star
Because Ford doesn't have any money to waste?

How exactly would Ford benefit from buying Chrysler?
For starters, as part of the deal. Ford would get Chrysler's 18 billion in cash, and could also profit by keeping the Jeep brand.

As for the Chrysler, and Dodge brands are concerned. Ford could either sell them off to Nissan/Renault, whose also expressed interest in acquiring part of Chrysler as well. Or Ford could just simply dissolve them altogether.


Therefore, how is this wasting money ? As I'm sure that Chrysler's 18 Billion would definitely benefit Ford, and not hurt them.


That being said, if this is truly a waste of money. Then explain how the same deal would benefit GM, and not Ford.

The last I checked, GM has far less money to waste, than what Ford does !
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #56  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Ford has enough problems managing their own brands, they don't need another brand.

Chrysler has only one vehicle that could benefit Ford and that's Jeep Wrangler. The rest of Chrysler's lineup is a joke.

If Ford wants to spend money on something they should buy remaining 2/3 of Mazda.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #57  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
It would be cool if Ford had Jeep though
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #58  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Only Jeep worth keeping is Wrangler.

Commander and Grand Cherokee would only bring competition to Explorer and Compass and Patriot are a joke.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #59  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 2,530
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by Red Star
Only Jeep worth keeping is Wrangler.

Commander and Grand Cherokee would only bring competition to Explorer and Compass and Patriot are a joke.
There would be no competition, if Commander and Grand Cherokee replace the Explorer, and Excursion altogether. As Excursion just uses way too much fuel, due to it's huge size. And Explorer is just getting plain old anyhow !
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #60  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
There would be no competition, if Commander and Grand Cherokee replace the Explorer, and Excursion altogether. As Excursion just uses way too much fuel, due to it's huge size. And Explorer is just getting plain old anyhow !
Hey Rocky, the Excursion hasn't been made in several years. I believe you are meaning the Expedition.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.