General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

The End of Chrysler...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #21  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
So I take it you really don't care for GM interiors Paul
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #22  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 625
From: Odenville, AL
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
So I take it you really don't care for GM interiors Paul
No

Having worked on Fords, GM's and Chryslers up to new I think I've got a fair assessment

Even a 2002 Trans Am while better than earlier cars still has issues...door panels prone to cracking as an example.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #23  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
I don't understand how a company can buy the company for less then 11 billion, and get 11 billion in cash with the deal as well. I know there is reasons for it, but to a normal person it sounds like getting a company for free.


Me "I'll buy this house from you for $200,000 if one of the rooms in it contains $250,000 in cash." Seller "OK!"

Last edited by Knight; Oct 21, 2008 at 10:56 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 02:35 PM
  #24  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
I think GM buying Chrysler will sink GM even faster than they're sinking now. I worked for a company once that tried this. Just shoveling through the power struggles within management will take the better part of a year or maybe more. My company sank like a rock to the bottom once it was combined.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #25  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Originally Posted by Knight
I don't understand how a company can buy the company for less then 11 billion, and get 11 billion in cash with the deal as well. I know there is reasons for it, but to a normal person it sounds like getting a company for free.


Me "I'll buy this house from you for $200,000 if one of the rooms in it contains $250,000 in cash." Seller "OK!"
What if it costs the seller $100,000 a year to maintain the house, and they weren't making enough in profits to hold on to the house much longer. Instead of living with the house for 2.5 years and then going bust, offload the problem house, with its assets, and you can move on to try something new with your life without wasting the 2.5 years on that house that was going to bankrupt you anyway

basically its just saving time... at least I think it is. thats how it sounds in the Arin brain
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #26  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
How about you slowly and methodically tear the house apart selling the pieces (assets) as you go. First you pull out the kitchen sink and sell it on ebay. Then you pull out the bath tub and sell it on ebay. Finally you sell the lot the house sat on and you have recouped your investment and yet you still get to keep the cash. In theory it works, I don't know if this is GM's intention because I have no idea what the requirements for the Chrysler employees pension plan would be. They would probably renegotiate huge cuts and concessions blaming tough times for the auto industry and then go ahead and bust it up anyway. Or even better for GM offload Chrylser's pension on the US taxpayer much like airline companies have done.

The problem is if it was really worth cannibalizing the equity firm that holds it would have done it already.

Last edited by 2k7gtcs; Oct 21, 2008 at 03:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #27  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by 97svtgoin05gt
I think GM buying Chrysler will sink GM even faster than they're sinking now. I worked for a company once that tried this. Just shoveling through the power struggles within management will take the better part of a year or maybe more. My company sank like a rock to the bottom once it was combined.
Agreed. It's like two drowning men grabbing on to each other to stay afloat. Buying Chrysler will be a qaugmire for GM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #28  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
GIGGITY

Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #29  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I hope Renault will buy Chrysler. That was Chrysler and Dodge will survive for sure.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #30  
edumspeed's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 5,665
Likes: 39
From: PR
That may work.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #31  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
Originally Posted by Knight
I don't understand how a company can buy the company for less then 11 billion, and get 11 billion in cash with the deal as well. I know there is reasons for it, but to a normal person it sounds like getting a company for free.


Me "I'll buy this house from you for $200,000 if one of the rooms in it contains $250,000 in cash." Seller "OK!"
I don't get it either, but I think there's one thing we can all agree on. If GM gets Chrysler, then the US Government will bail out GM for sure if they fail since there will be too many jobs at stake....good or bad? I am not sure.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #32  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by TomServo92
Agreed. It's like two drowning men grabbing on to each other to stay afloat. Buying Chrysler will be a qaugmire for GM.
This makes sense to me, too, except that I must assume GM and Chrysler would be well aware of this, and that other factors come into consideration. And, again, with Cerberus owning 51% of GM, they may be foisting Chrysler upon the General ... with the General likely to dissolve everything but Jeep, gain some tax leverage, and be in a better position to seek valuable concessions from the government.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #33  
GrnT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2008
Posts: 6,717
Likes: 109
From: Apple Valley Mn.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 08:22 AM
  #34  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
something will have to give...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #35  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Red Star
I hope Renault will buy Chrysler. That was Chrysler and Dodge will survive for sure.
Does anyone remember when Renault bought AMC? It was a brief union that was pretty much a disaster. In the end, Chrysler bought the remnants of AMC and liquidated the rest.

In the end, it's all about profit. Unfortunately, stripping Chrysler and keeping Jeep probably makes the most business sense.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #36  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Yeah, but Renault didn't had Carlos Ghosn back then.
He managed to turn Nissan, after Renault bought them, from a point where they were ready to file for bankruptcy to a point when they made a profit in just 1 year.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #37  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
This makes sense to me, too, except that I must assume GM and Chrysler would be well aware of this, and that other factors come into consideration. And, again, with Cerberus owning 51% of GM, they may be foisting Chrysler upon the General ... with the General likely to dissolve everything but Jeep, gain some tax leverage, and be in a better position to seek valuable concessions from the government.
GM can't even manager their own brands and production over-capacity. I don't have much confidence that they know how to deal with Chrysler once they have it. IMO this whole things just reeks of desperation.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #38  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
This merger tells us a lot about the shape GM is in. Cerberus is dangling the 11 billion dollars that goes with Chrysler like a carrot, and despite the fact that taking on Chrysler is going to make every problematic logistical issue at the General even worse GM is so cash strapped that they just don't care. It looks like GM has resorted to simply gritting their teeth, closing their eyes, and squeezing the trigger on this deal despite what common sense is telling them because they can't come up with a better answer. Perhaps they are hoping that somehow they can manage something so miraculous with that 11 billion dollars that they can dodge (no pun intended) the bullet pulling the trigger on this deal is going to let loose.

That is desperation pure and simple, and says a lot about how close bankruptcy is for GM. Even more tragic, under decent management Chrysler represents a much easier and cheaper fix than GM does since they lack GM's rather severe brand redundancy problem and aren't quite as desperate for cash. Alas, it looks like GM's final major foray into stupidity may be making certain that they don't ride into that dry, dusty sunset alone. What a bunch of ***holes.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #39  
Autotooner's Avatar
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Joined: August 6, 2004
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 4
From: Parkersburg, WV
Originally Posted by future9er24
GIGGITY

LMAO!!!

BTW, Arin- your custom title???
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #40  
edumspeed's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Pr
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 5,665
Likes: 39
From: PR
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM.