Chrysler 300C SRT8 spy photos
4/6/11, 05:35 PM
#6
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4/7/11, 08:09 AM
#9
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4/7/11, 10:13 AM
#10
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But it's a Chrysler. They're dead last among American manufacturers in initial quality and dependability. Why pay that much for a car that's going to have issues and wind up in the shop all of the time? Heck, why do you think Chrysler and GM offer longer warranties than Ford? Because they have to.
It's too bad because cars like the 300C are great ideas and there's certainly a market for V8 sedans.
It's too bad because cars like the 300C are great ideas and there's certainly a market for V8 sedans.
4/7/11, 10:48 AM
#11
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hyundai/Kia, for an example, still has 10 years / 100,000 miles warranty even with their quality being better then average (on last JD Powers study they actually beat both Honda and Ford in dependability).
I agree that Chrysler used to make crap cars, I had a pretty bad experience with a 1997 Dodge Intrepid, but their newer products are pretty well done. If anything else, they made a huge improvements in interior quality.
4/7/11, 01:08 PM
#12
GTR Member
I like it. Looks much better without all the chrome of the standard car. This or Charger SRT/8 would make a great daily driver with the Mustang for special occasions 
4/8/11, 09:15 AM
#13
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 4, 2010
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MusicMan66
But it's a Chrysler. They're dead last among American manufacturers in initial quality and dependability. Why pay that much for a car that's going to have issues and wind up in the shop all of the time? Heck, why do you think Chrysler and GM offer longer warranties than Ford? Because they have to.
It's too bad because cars like the 300C are great ideas and there's certainly a market for V8 sedans.
It's too bad because cars like the 300C are great ideas and there's certainly a market for V8 sedans.
4/8/11, 10:03 AM
#14
Needs to be more Astony
But the whole reason they did that was to get people to start buying their less then quality products. It is true they are better now but the original intent was to entice people to buy their lower quality vehicles. And they can't go change the warrenty lower now.
4/8/11, 10:28 AM
#15
Founding MOTM
Committee Member
Committee Member
I was meaning more as the SRT8 platform and more specifically on the Challenger's end. Sorry, should have clarified. Otherwise, i'd be happy with an SRT8.
4/11/11, 11:45 AM
#20
MOTM Committee Member
Speaking of Chrysler quality... http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/11/v...par/#continued