General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

Challenger SRT8 MSRP announced.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #21  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
From allpar...

http://www.allpar.com/cars/dodge/challenger.html


Base (auto) 3.5L 4-speed auto 17x7.0 18x7.5

R/T 5.7L 5-speed* auto 20x8
R/T 6-speed** manual

SRT8 6.1L 5-speed auto 20x9
SRT8 6-speed** manual
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #22  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
If those prices do hold up, even with ADM, that comes out to less than what was observed with the initial release of the GT500. Supposing that $10k difference between R/T vs SRT pans out, Ford (or more precisely, its dealer network) better get its act together. The Camaro will only make things more interesting...
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #23  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by hi5.0
If those prices do hold up, even with ADM, that comes out to less than what was observed with the initial release of the GT500. Supposing that $10k difference between R/T vs SRT pans out, Ford (or more precisely, its dealer network) better get its act together. The Camaro will only make things more interesting...
If we must use the Charger as a benchmark for markup then it might be worth keeping mind the fact that the difference between run of the mill Charger RT's and the SRT8 model isn't 10k, but is in fact more like 7.5k. Assuming the listed msrp holds and that the difference is that large that makes the Challenger RT a 30k car to start. And I'd be willing to bet you wont be able to spec out a Challenger RT for even that small an amount of money. Also, as reported here earlier by someboyd else, it looks like the Challenger will weigh every bit as much as it's sedan platform-mates in production trim. We'' have to wait and see if that tidbit of info holds up, but given the Challenger's size this indeed seems likely.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #24  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Webpage says $40,095!

http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/challenger/

A Glimpse of the Challengers 20x9 Wheels...









Reply
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #25  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
That side profile picture looks a lot like an extended Mustang. Nice looking car though. Love the grille!!
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #26  
StangPower05's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A
Originally Posted by Topnotch
http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/challenger/

A Glimpse of the Challengers 20x9 Wheels...










In the link posted, it says that the car will MSRP at 40,095!! Which price is correct???
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #27  
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 65
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Silver99v6
Have they released any production photos?
Here are the only production cell phone pics...


Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #28  
bt4's Avatar
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
$38K for a base price seems--on par with what Chrysler has been tagging on the SRT8 Charger. It seems rational, since the Charger and Challenger will share a platform, that the price will be in the same ballpark if the content is the same. Not bad, but it really doesn't seem like such a great deal, unless you absoultely have to have (some will) a Challenger SRT8. The Challenger may be lighter, than the Charger but not by a significant amount. Good comparo on the SRT8 vs GTO in MotorTrend

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ecs_price.html

$38k was the base price with the price as tested just a hair under $44K. Just guessing, but the Challenger probably won't be too much different. The SRT8 Charger performance numbers are close to the same as a Mustang GT and nowhere close the numbers put up by the Shelby GT500 in 0-60, or quarter mile times. The Dodge is paying a penalty for the weight it carries. (The GTO was quicker, despite having less HP.) The Challenger is going to have to weigh considerably less to offer a significant increase in performance if Dodge stays with the current 425-hp offering.

FYI: MT Shelby numbers
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...500/specs.html
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #29  
Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
thats insane that a 425hp 4200 lbs car only traps 106 and a 500hp 3900lbs car traps 116mph. 10mph is a ton.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #30  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Knight
thats insane that a 425hp 4200 lbs car only traps 106 and a 500hp 3900lbs car traps 116mph. 10mph is a ton.
Once you take torque curve into consideration, and factor it in with the other advantages, it isn't that hard to believe. Although to be fair to the Pentastar boys existing SRT8's can do a bit better than that. Still, best possible 1/4 mile times for the GT500 versus the existing SRT8's sees just a bit more than a half second spread which isn't out of line with your posted trap speeds. I don't see the Challenger's potential improvements making up that kind of ground, particularly since the latest rumours have the coupe weighing in at almost exactly what the sedans do. In the hands of an average driver I'd guess that the Challenger and GT500 will be very close since the Challenger will likely be much easier to drive fast. (it seems that just about everything is easy to drive fast when compared to the GT500) But I don't see much possibility of an even race given truly skilled drivers.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #31  
StangPower05's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A
http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/challenger/

It might just be me, but when i click the link above, it says the Challenger SRT-8 will MSRP @ 40,095?? Am i going crazy or does it say that?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #32  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Is kind of fnuny that they hang the asterix out there with no footnote to accompany it. Best guess: GG tax and destination are included in that total.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #33  
bt4's Avatar
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jsaylor
In the hands of an average driver I'd guess that the Challenger and GT500 will be very close since the Challenger will likely be much easier to drive fast. (it seems that just about everything is easy to drive fast when compared to the GT500) But I don't see much possibility of an even race given truly skilled drivers.
Maybe--but according to the review in MT:

"The GT500 is a full half second faster than either car from 45 to 60 mph and more than two seconds quicker to 100 mph. It's fast. The GT500 also is the easiest to drive quickly when the roads start to sweep and swoop through the hills..."

Of course as with any review, when it comes to driving impressions, much of what you read is subjective, so you can't take it as gospel. Different drivers--different opinions.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #34  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
Originally Posted by StangPower05
http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/challenger/

It might just be me, but when i click the link above, it says the Challenger SRT-8 will MSRP @ 40,095?? Am i going crazy or does it say that?
That says for a "Limited Edition" Challenger SRT8 (aren't the all?), so maybe there's a "standard" SRT8 that'll go for the $38K announced.

Either that or the Dodge Web master got the wrong memo.

In either case, I think that's a fairly reasonable price, if not a screaming bargain presuming an essentially a much more handsome two-door Charger in terms of general engineering, features and equipment content. Likely the other versions of the Challenger will similarly parallel the Chargers pricing scheme.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 02:27 PM
  #35  
Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by StangPower05
http://www.dodge.com/en/2008/challenger/

It might just be me, but when i click the link above, it says the Challenger SRT-8 will MSRP @ 40,095?? Am i going crazy or does it say that?
yeah you are crazy, when i go there it clearly states $37,995.






yeah i dunno why it lists at 40k like that when Chrysler anounced it as 37,995.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #36  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
As some here have surmised my guess is that the 40k sticker listed for the limited edition model either includes GGT, which I doubt, or is simply the inflated price tag for the limited edition model in question which seems likely. (if any SRT8 can be called run of the mill)
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #37  
CircuitBreaker's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
http://jalopnik.com/cars/challenger-...ger-273280.php

Dodge's all-new muscle car will be built on the new "LY" RWD platform in Ontario, Canada. Production will start in the spring of 2008 - and the Challenger will go on sale shortly afterwards as a 2008 model. Pricing is expected to start around $31,000, although it's rumored that the R/T models have all been pre-sold in the 50K range. A convertible is also expected to arrive in the not-so-distant future.
The official debut of the (production) Challenger will be on February 6th at the Chicago Auto Show - just 222 days away."
Oh, we can already taste the adrenalin from the mere thought of the new era of muscle car wars! High-resolution picture available via the link below and gallery of the approved-for-production concept car below that. – Ray Wert

[2008 Dodge Challenger]

galleryPost('DodgeChallenger', 12, 'The Dodge Challenger Is Go For 2008');
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #38  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Looks like MRSP for SRT-8 will be $40,095.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #39  
Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by Red Star
Looks like MRSP for SRT-8 will be $40,095.

then why did dodge give a special announcment yesterday saying the msrp was 37,995?

AUBURN HILLS, Mich., Nov. 29 -- Dodge announced pricing today for the modern interpretation of the American muscle coupe. The 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8(R) will arrive in showrooms next spring at a Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $37,995 (which includes $675 destination).
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 10:04 AM
  #40  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
GG tax is what I read elsewhere
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.