Not too bad! Its even pretty good for a charger!

 

eehhhh... i dont know.... seems to flow terribly. looks like a Jeep interior

 

From the 90s

 

Kinda like the 1970 Chally

 

Boy the Chrysler hate here is palpable. The interior looks more inviting than the current generation, which frankly, works very well ergonomically, but like my 06 GT uses too much hard plastic.

The LX cars are great IMO. They re-introduced America to affordable rear drive and V8 sedans, the chassis is rock solid, and the powertrains have all been very solid.

I'm really not a brand loyal guy, and I have to say the Chrysler's I've owned have been trouble free.

 

I only had one, 1997 Dodge Intrepid. Loved that car, but it was junk. When I sold it in 2008 with ~100,000 miles on the odometer the transmission was almost dead. And it had so many (some smaller, other larger) mechanical issues ... I wouldn't buy another Chrysler product at this time.

 

I wouldnt call the 2.7L Sludge Monster Rock Solid or the 4-Speed Auto from Dodge Trucks behind it and some 3.5L rock solid. The Benz Trans and the 3.5L and 5.7L on the other hand are fine.

 

Agreed, although the 4-speed auto while one of the most lackluster transmissions I've ever sampled has for the most part been upgraded and improved over the years to a point where relaibility is much improved over the troublesome late 90's era versions.

You are correct though, I'd never buy the 2.7 4-speed combo, or frankly any 4-speed car when there is the 5-speed Benz trans available.

 

Dodge disgusts me. I've rented numerous Chryslers products including a brand new calibur with less than 300 miles on the odometer that squeaked whenever you turned. My 1999 Mercury Cougar w/135000 mi has less rattles and squeaks

 

it's too flat, doesnt really look very driver oriented