General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

2008 Dodge Dakota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
2008 Dodge Dakota

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/c...kota-for-2008/









Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 04:01 PM
  #2  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #3  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I agree.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 10:39 PM
  #4  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
At least it isn't ugly, like the Tundra
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 09:44 AM
  #5  
vistablue mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2005
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Originally Posted by future9er24
At least it isn't ugly, like the Tundra
I agree, the Tundra is butt ugly. Still Dodge could have done better on this.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #6  
bar's Avatar
bar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Not much improvement on the facelift, but 290HP/320Ft-lbs w/5spd auto. in a mid-size is sweet.

Perhaps an all body-colored grill in another, darker color (other than red) would help camouflage the "uglies"...
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #7  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Boring, uninspired, and no unity of design. The gille and hood look look like they were designed for a different truck, they don't match the front 1/4 panels and headlights at all.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #8  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Not that bad looking in my opinion. Looks like a truck. I do like the color matching grill/rear bumper better than the chrome.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #9  
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Joined: December 5, 2006
Posts: 31,454
Likes: 71
From: Trapped in Minnesota
I sorta like it, but the front reminds me too much of a caliber.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 04:41 PM
  #10  
SteelTownStang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 1
I like it, especially the new 4.7
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #11  
mustang_sallad's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
I like it. Huge improvement over the last one, which was weird and ugly. This one's more conservative, but good looking in my opinion.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #12  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
I saw the new Dakota at the Chicago Auto Show, and it looked pretty sweet in person. And the interior was nice-looking, too (they wouldn't let anyone get inside the truck). By contrast, IMO, the Tundra's interior is poorly-designed, cheap-feeling and plasticy. I wonder if the rags will point this out like they do with virtually all domestic cars ("the interior is awash with hard plastic..." blah blah).
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #13  
black_bullitt's Avatar
 
Joined: November 30, 2006
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Spain
Originally Posted by Moosetang
Boring, uninspired, and no unity of design. The gille and hood look look like they were designed for a different truck, they don't match the front 1/4 panels and headlights at all.
my thoughts exactly; looks like a mutt
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #14  
gpd215's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 08:24 PM
  #15  
CircuitBreaker's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Only Dakota I liked was the R/T but it was weak..
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #16  
Outlander's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Nice to see they're softening the edges. Now what they need to fix so I would actually buy one:

1) Price - why buy a Dakota when you can have an F150 or Ram for the same price?
2) MPG - why buy a Dakota when it gets the same mpg as an F150 or RAM?
3) Equipment - LSD and tow are almost impossible to find without getting a bunch of stuff you don't want.
4) ABS - 4 wheel not standard
5) AWD - Unlike GM's profileration of AutoTrac, I've only seen it on 2 vehicles the whole time its been 'available'.
6) Interior - What are they doing with all the money they're saving there? It makes the oft berated Mustang's look plush.
7) The final five - D-o-d-g-e
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #17  
OdiousBarbarian's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2006
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
man! that front end is FUUUUUUUGLY
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duppycat
General Mustang Chat
2
Feb 16, 2019 08:36 AM
NC14GT
Road Trips
43
Sep 10, 2017 04:47 PM
AdPock
General Mustang Chat
7
Oct 16, 2015 02:58 PM
BavarianStang
Ford Discussions
0
Sep 5, 2015 05:55 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 PM.