General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

2008 Chevy Corvette revealed with new 6.2L LS3 V8 and up to 436 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/27/07, 09:20 AM
  #1  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 Chevy Corvette revealed with new 6.2L LS3 V8 and up to 436 hp

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/27/2...and-up-to-436/
Old 4/27/07, 12:32 PM
  #2  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
so does this mean we will be beable to pick up '05-'07s cheap since they are "underpowered" like the 350 GTO?
Old 4/27/07, 02:03 PM
  #3  
Mach 1 Member
 
rocket88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
something about that interior...I'm not sure what it is...just looks retarded.
Old 4/27/07, 02:20 PM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
 
neil07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 25, 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rocket88
something about that interior...I'm not sure what it is...just looks retarded.
Good thing that interior pkg is only an option. That padded leather wrapped look is not my cup of tea.

I was hoping GM would change the headlights. I'm not a fan of the current style headlights.
Old 4/27/07, 03:21 PM
  #5  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
I like that there is an exhaust option that is louder AND adds 6 more hp!....that would be cool to have on a Mustang....Performance exhaust....check!
Old 4/27/07, 03:43 PM
  #6  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gawd that interior's bad. Say what you will about the 'Stang's interior, but a car that costs that much shouldn't have an interior from the 1990s.
Old 4/27/07, 05:23 PM
  #7  
Cam Tease
 
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moosetang
Gawd that interior's bad. Say what you will about the 'Stang's interior, but a car that costs that much shouldn't have an interior from the 1990s.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Old 4/27/07, 05:30 PM
  #8  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
SteelTownStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Everything about this car is simply awesome.
Old 4/27/07, 09:24 PM
  #9  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AnotherMustangMan
I don't know what you're talking about.
Looks like a next-year update on a 98 STi's interior.
Old 4/27/07, 09:25 PM
  #10  
 
codeman94's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 7,930
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
I like the interior...
Old 4/27/07, 10:31 PM
  #11  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AnotherMustangMan
I don't know what you're talking about.
He could be referring to how the Vette's threads stack up to similarly priced competitors, like the Cayman's interior represented in the pic below. The difference is jaw dropping to be kind. And while Vette enthusiasts may argue that the Chevy's straight line performance makes up for the difference, I'd argue that the Vette still making due with a set of duds more appropriate to a last gen Grand Am than the premier Chevy offering shows that somebody at GM Corporate still doesn't get it. An interior on par with the best competitors wouldn't bump the Vette's price two grand which is what makes this all truly laughable.
Attached Images  
Old 4/27/07, 11:14 PM
  #12  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesn't look that bad - other than the hideous center console armrest! It just isn't good either. If not for the Corvette badges, I wouldn't know what GM car it was in. But... I'm willing to say that if Ford offered a 450+ HP car with a similar interior treatment for over $40k, the faithful would forgive Ford because the engine/straight line performance would make up for it. Waitaminit... (cough)(whisper *GT500*)


Old 4/28/07, 01:01 AM
  #13  
Cam Tease
 
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jsaylor
He could be referring to how the Vette's threads stack up to similarly priced competitors, like the Cayman's interior represented in the pic below.
Similarly priced? 'Vettes start at $45k, Cayman Ss at $60k. If the 'Vettes straight line perfomance doesn't make up for interior quality differences, $15k does...
Old 4/28/07, 01:07 AM
  #14  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hi5.0
It doesn't look that bad - other than the hideous center console armrest! It just isn't good either. If not for the Corvette badges, I wouldn't know what GM car it was in. But... I'm willing to say that if Ford offered a 450+ HP car with a similar interior treatment for over $40k, the faithful would forgive Ford because the engine/straight line performance would make up for it. Waitaminit... (cough)(whisper *GT500*)


The GT500's roots are in a $20K car, though, there's only so much better matierials and badges can do. The 'Vette, on the other hand, is a from-stratch over-$40K car. Its interior should be at least competetive with other cars in that price range, but as I said it looks like a warmed-over Subie from 8 years ago. And how will that interior look when you're paying $80-100k for SE 'Vettes??

J, you're right on as usual. The Cayman's light-years past the 'Vette, in more ways than one.
Old 4/29/07, 05:04 PM
  #15  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moosetang
The GT500's roots are in a $20K car, though, there's only so much better matierials and badges can do. The 'Vette, on the other hand, is a from-stratch over-$40K car. Its interior should be at least competetive with other cars in that price range, but as I said it looks like a warmed-over Subie from 8 years ago. And how will that interior look when you're paying $80-100k for SE 'Vettes??

J, you're right on as usual. The Cayman's light-years past the 'Vette, in more ways than one.
Thanks Moosetang. For those with opposing viewpoints....if the Vettes interior doesn't bother you so be it. But getting out of a Cayman and into a Vette is roughly akin to walking out of the Louvre and straight into Jim Bob's Alligator Farm and Reptile Museum. And since the Cayman starts at 50k that places this car smack in the middle of the standard Corvette coupes price range.

Yeah, the Vette brings a lot more power to the table, but somehow I don't think a guy accustomed to the level of quality found in the interior of Mercedes or Audi sedan is going to be happy when he drops is rear into a Vette. And this is one of the many reasons Porsche continues to sell cars and can continue to ask more money for them..which brings me back to my original point.

The fact that Chevy still doesn't understand the massive change a 2k dollar bump in msrp could bring to the Vette's interior, and through this to the cars image and appeal worldwide, serves as notice that GM still has a long way to go in many respects including their understanding of why their cars don't sell as well as they could or should..
Old 4/29/07, 05:23 PM
  #16  
Cam Tease
 
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So spend $5k more for a 245 hp Cayman.
Old 4/30/07, 12:02 PM
  #17  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AnotherMustangMan
So spend $5k more for a 245 hp Cayman.
If you want to feel like you actually spent that money on a car with an interior worth the price of entry every time you sit in it..yeah. And frankly the differences in quality don't stop theren with this being but the most obvious of them. Eveything about the Cayman feels polished and balanced, you can't say the same for the Vette. I'm amazed by those who argue that simple speed is everything. In that instance I'd suggest Lotus find a way to stuff the Noble's twin turbo Ford V6 in the Exige since, for the 5-10k max that would up the Exige's pricetag, they'd rule the known world with the insane power to weight ratio that thing would provide.
Old 4/30/07, 12:17 PM
  #18  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
some people don't car about interior quality. I buy a car for performance alone and am very budget minded.

The interior does not help my car go foward backward left or right any better. I could care less if it is made outta soft leather or plywood. Only things needs in the interior that are worth doing somthing with is the seat, and steering wheel.
Old 4/30/07, 01:44 PM
  #19  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Knight
some people don't car about interior quality. I buy a car for performance alone and am very budget minded.

The interior does not help my car go foward backward left or right any better. I could care less if it is made outta soft leather or plywood. Only things needs in the interior that are worth doing somthing with is the seat, and steering wheel.
Frankly, if you think that interior quality is all this is about you've missed the point. Focusing on the interior was nothing more than an attempt to simplify the comparison to try and make a point. But even just addressing that one aspect, if you don't care about comfort at all that is fine, for you and others who feel the same way. The point is not everybody agrees and this doesn't seem as though it should be a mystery to anyone seriously involved in the car hobby. I like cars for many different reasons...for me it is always the combination of features and how they contribute to what the car is supposed to do for the owner that appeals to me.

For example I like several cars which possess interiors that could stand improvement....in those cars I can overlook certain shortcomings because I think other areas make up for it or because overall the car is well executed. And like everybody else I also happen to like what I like. But this growing notion that all that should really matter to anyone in a performance car is outright speed is simply ridiculous.

I also believe a great many people who claim that they don't care about anything other than performance often experience an abrupt change of opinion when they have to live with their decision on a daily basis. I say this based on personal experience and simple market realities. For example... If this wasn't the case the market for the Z06 would not have declined as abruptly as it has so soon in that models lifespan.
Old 4/30/07, 01:47 PM
  #20  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by jsaylor
I also believe a great many people who claim that they don't care about anything other than performance often experience an abrupt change of opinion when they have to live with their decision on a daily basis.
my car is my daily driver...


Quick Reply: 2008 Chevy Corvette revealed with new 6.2L LS3 V8 and up to 436 hp



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:43 PM.