will 300hp be enough?
8/8/04, 02:46 PM
#41
Now, I have seen the GTO (Five to be exact) and I gotta tell you, I'm not impressed. It just reminds me of an overdone cavalier. Oh and those five GTO's, sitting on FORD used car lots. Great ain't it? 
8/8/04, 03:12 PM
#43
Yeah I nearly laughed my **** off when I saw the first one. After that I just kind of assumed that they had some kind of problem and just felt sorry for the GM fanboys and their Aussie? American Muscle Car. :notnice:
8/8/04, 03:23 PM
#46
FR500 Member
Join Date: June 12, 2004
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought about this...............300hp is a great number to start with because sooon we'll be able to mod the car. a more powerful engine means the car will be more expensive and they wanna keep the price of this car hanging around $28,000. cuz if it went over $30,000 the GTO would be mine
8/8/04, 05:33 PM
#49
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by SuprChrgdVETTEZ06@August 8, 2004, 5:16 PM
That is sooo weak. 300hp, HAHA. Ohhh wait sorry Slowstangs are weak as heck, Mustangs stink.
That is sooo weak. 300hp, HAHA. Ohhh wait sorry Slowstangs are weak as heck, Mustangs stink.
8/8/04, 05:38 PM
#51
Member
Join Date: August 4, 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so would u say the cobra is like the GTO? It is just another mustang... Kinda like the GTO is just another GP. Im not trying to back up GTO there pretty kool but would take a cobra over a gto anyday. Just wondering what u guys think.
8/8/04, 07:29 PM
#53
Member
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dr Iven@August 7, 2004, 6:26 PM
Mustang fan boy criticism? If you haven't noticed, it's hardly just fan boys criticizing the GTO's bland styling. Magazine reviews haven't been too positive about the styling (although most say it's not bad). The public has had its say by not going out and purchasing very many of the GTO's.
As a car, the GTO is, well, nice. It does, however, look like any typical base model pontiac. Just because a car is a sleeper, it doesn't mean it has to be uninspiring. And if they were going for a sleeper car, why did they call it the GTO?
Mustang fan boy criticism? If you haven't noticed, it's hardly just fan boys criticizing the GTO's bland styling. Magazine reviews haven't been too positive about the styling (although most say it's not bad). The public has had its say by not going out and purchasing very many of the GTO's.
As a car, the GTO is, well, nice. It does, however, look like any typical base model pontiac. Just because a car is a sleeper, it doesn't mean it has to be uninspiring. And if they were going for a sleeper car, why did they call it the GTO?
8/8/04, 08:32 PM
#55
Member
Join Date: August 8, 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Avalanche+August 8, 2004, 2:47 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Avalanche @ August 8, 2004, 2:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Cameron@August 8, 2004, 4:16 PM
To take it a step further (and let the flames follow), the GTO has more than one similarity to the current Mustang from an appearence perspective. I don't find either ugly, but both are unspectacular in the sheet metal department.
To take it a step further (and let the flames follow), the GTO has more than one similarity to the current Mustang from an appearence perspective. I don't find either ugly, but both are unspectacular in the sheet metal department.
I was referring to the 99-04 models. The 2005 Mustang is the first Ford in a few decades that would bring me to the Ford showroom. The new Mustang has the retro style that the GTO should have embraced. The GTO is a great car under the sheet metal, but to make it desirable in my eyes they should have taken some risks with the styling rather than creating an OK car and throwing GTO on it.
Is it any wonder why GM is losing huge chunks of the market? Do they have anything exciting in their stable these days? Even the new vette which is techincally superior to the previos looks pretty much like the stuff they kicked out 10 years ago.
8/8/04, 10:52 PM
#57
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I wouldn't exactly say that the Vette is decades behind the GT.
When a Vette costs a third of the price and puts out 80% of the horsepower that the GT does (and naturally aspirated at that), I wouldn't say the Vette is behind.
Granted, the GT would blow the Vette away on handling (mid-engine), but the Vette is a very nice car for the price.
When a Vette costs a third of the price and puts out 80% of the horsepower that the GT does (and naturally aspirated at that), I wouldn't say the Vette is behind.
Granted, the GT would blow the Vette away on handling (mid-engine), but the Vette is a very nice car for the price.
8/9/04, 06:21 AM
#60
Cobra R Member
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Soccer2789@August 9, 2004, 2:33 AM
Did i miss something? Your not talking about the new vette, or any vette within the past 10 years right?
Did i miss something? Your not talking about the new vette, or any vette within the past 10 years right?