wannabe shaker!!!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 7, 2007 | 11:45 AM

#21

YALLER

GT Member

Joined: August 3, 2005

Posts: 215

Likes: 0

From: S.C.

one person bid three times, looking for the reserve amount

Nov 7, 2007 | 05:32 PM

#22

Poco

Cobra R Member

Joined: November 7, 2006

Posts: 1,706

Likes: 23

Quote:

Originally Posted by n8rfastback

cant these guys get in trouble for using the "shaker" name????

I thought MOPAR had "shaker" under some them Cuda hoods.

Nov 7, 2007 | 06:19 PM

#23

n8rfastback

Thread Starter

Shelby GT350 Member

Joined: June 25, 2007

Posts: 2,416

Likes: 1

hmmm... you may be right.

Nov 17, 2007 | 02:33 PM

#24

pantera72

GT Member

Joined: May 9, 2007

Posts: 169

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdbrown75

While this particular system does look awful, you have to give some credit to someone trying to put together an affordable solution. Nearly $800 for the CDC system is just ridiculous. I would pay $350-$400 for a good shaker system, but CDC is not going to see any of my business at its current prices.

Tim

Nov 18, 2007 | 03:15 AM

#25

jay_wx

Team Mustang Source

Joined: August 23, 2004

Posts: 461

Likes: 0

From: Austin TX

Looks like a "Mini Me" version of the CDC Shaker...

Nov 18, 2007 | 07:07 PM

#26

F150ATM

V6 Member

Joined: December 28, 2006

Posts: 93

Likes: 0

I don't understand what all the fuss is about. It doesn't look half bad, and would probably look even better in flat black.

In terms of efficiency, yeah, it's probably not much better than stock, but I think it looks good.

In any event, it doesn't look worse than the 100% non functional turd Ford's gluing onto hoods now