2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Spoiler effectiveness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/14/04, 07:48 AM
  #1  
Shelby GT500 Member
Thread Starter
 
GhostTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 10, 2004
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 2,585
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Still toying with the idea about whether to get a spoiler or not on the '05.

So, by getting one, how effective is it? At what speeds does it need to actually keep the rear down and not get too "light" in the back end?

Or is the spoiler entirely decorative?
Old 7/14/04, 07:51 AM
  #2  
Cobra R Member
 
BLAKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Entirely decorative. It's my understanding that in most cases (Mustang included) they intentionally design it to provide neutral (no) downforce.

No wing for me thanks.
Old 7/14/04, 08:08 AM
  #3  
Shelby GT500 Member
Thread Starter
 
GhostTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 10, 2004
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 2,585
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
If that's true, then YES...bye bye wing.
Old 7/14/04, 08:10 AM
  #4  
Cobra R Member
 
Kahdir's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

I'm glad to see that I'll be one of the few to sport the wing
Old 7/14/04, 08:14 AM
  #5  
Cobra Member
 
GTJOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm getting a spoiler!
Old 7/14/04, 08:21 AM
  #6  
GT Member
 
Linkoln's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 5, 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually from what I've read spoilers in general do not kick in until about 60-75 mph.

In the case of the mustang 99% it is decorative.

Of course you could buy an airplane wing and staple it ur trunk......but then we'd have to ban u for going rice burner.
Old 7/14/04, 08:42 AM
  #7  
GT Member
 
Must_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spoiler for me too! IMHO, it just looks better. ^_^
Old 7/14/04, 08:53 AM
  #8  
Bullitt Member
 
gotmy05's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like it... I like it a lot
Old 7/14/04, 09:19 AM
  #9  
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 5,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its for looks. I personally like the spoiler, even if it is not functional, and therefore it'll be on my order sheet (though us Canucks don't exactly have a choice....no spoiler delete from what we've read).
Old 7/14/04, 10:15 AM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
billsstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for me I like the spoiler, and my '05 will have one ........... I just think it makes the car much better lookin.
Could not picture my '02 without it.
Old 7/14/04, 10:15 AM
  #11  
I Have Admin Envy
 
Galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That spoiler is 100% ornamental unfortunatley...

Just like Dan, I am stuck with the spoiler, but the more I look at it the more I don't like it.

When I order the car I will be contacting Ford dealers in the Buffalo area (1 hour drive away) and seeing if they have a spoilerless sonic car on the lot to swap decklids with. That will probably be cheaper than paying a bodyshop to pull the spoiler (my estimate, around $250)
Old 7/14/04, 10:27 AM
  #12  
Mach 1 Member
 
CA Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I don't like the spoiler. I ordered my '05 GT without the spoiler. The only spoiler I'd want would be a suble ducktail type of rear spoiler. It would be nice if we had some photos of the GT without the spoiler.

On the current Mustang, I like way the Bullit looks without the spoiler. It looks cleaner in my opinion.
Old 7/14/04, 11:25 AM
  #13  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd have to disagree in regards to its functionality, I'm sure it does function well to increase drag, preventing overly high top speeds and trap speeds as a safety measure, not to mention the oh-so useful increase in dead weight for like safety purposes. I mean, it's not like we're interested in having real, functional performance over the shallow appearance of such anyway, right?

Seriously, while some spoilers are actually there for a purpose, this ain't one of them (a close look will show it has the aerodynamics of a bard door). In my opinion, it really is a rather generic and trite performance ornament tacked on by the marketing department ("Gosh, every fast car has just gotta have a spoiler so every mouthbreather knows it, right?").

I do hope Ford rethinks having a delete option on that geegaw.
Old 7/14/04, 11:47 AM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
BlackRiderX's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IMO I couldn't tell much difference with it on or off. I'd probably leave it off but thats just me. The only reason I would leave it off is because they are a pain to clean underneath.
Old 7/14/04, 12:18 PM
  #15  
Team Mustang Source
 
Treadhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Location: Fort Worth,Tx
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The mouthbreather in me says," I'm getting the spoiler." I like the way it looks and would feel naked w/o it. B)
Old 7/14/04, 12:26 PM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
JZInternet's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by rhumb@July 14, 2004, 11:28 AM
... In my opinion, it really is a rather generic and trite performance ornament tacked on by the marketing department ("Gosh, every fast car has just gotta have a spoiler so every mouthbreather knows it, right?")...
lol I agree. The problem is I may be one of them. I don't know though I really loved pictures of the side view of the lowered gts without the spoiler that use to be in the 05 timeline. What happen to those brad?

Btw good topic. I was wondering about the effectivness of the spoiler but didn't think to post it.

I am going to have to see them in person to decide. I think in some people's case it's more what other people think instead of themselves. "Everyone may think I have a v6 or a slow car if it doesn't have it."

If I decide to get a vert I won't get one I know that.

BTW when was the first factory mustang gt with a spoiler built?

Jason
Old 7/14/04, 12:30 PM
  #17  
GT Member
 
Strider's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 7, 2004
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Treadhead@July 14, 2004, 12:21 PM
The mouthbreather in me says," I'm getting the spoiler." I like the way it looks and would feel naked w/o it. B)
You mean I'm gonna be driving around NAKED!!! :shock:

I better get a pretty dark tint on my windows then
Old 7/14/04, 12:52 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Tank's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the spoiler delete gives it a "bullitt-like" appearance. The spoiler makes the rear look too tall. I will personally be looking for a duck tail spoiler.
Old 7/14/04, 03:01 PM
  #19  
Mach 1 Member
 
Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, I'm still trying to decide. It pretty much goes against my own rules to have one...because I really want function over adding dead weight...although I guess I'm also going against my rules by getting the Shaker 1000, that adds pretty good weight too.
Old 7/14/04, 03:12 PM
  #20  
Mach 1 Member
 
Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, there are pics in the timeline of Stangs without spoilers. They are V6s, but that doesn't matter, as they look essentially the same from the rear.


Quick Reply: Spoiler effectiveness



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 PM.