2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Regular fuel 87 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #21  
TN615's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 30, 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JZInternet+November 12, 2004, 8:13 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JZInternet @ November 12, 2004, 8:13 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Stadifer@November 12, 2004, 5:42 PM
Is the new Mustang engine not built to run on regular? As I understand if this car is built to run on regular, premium would actually end up damaging the engine right?
I can't see premium gas damaging any engine. You should be able to run premium in anything. [/b][/quote]
There is a higher metalic content in 93 octane fuel.... which can damage a motor that is not designed to use that fuel.

In the owner manual is says use 87, that's what it was designed to use... but then it says if you experence any pinging swich to a fuel with a high octane level....? :scratch:

I really think they are watching their own butts on this one..... B)

At any rate I have been using mid-grade fuel, and I have not had any problems....

But my mpg, is not what I expected as we all have talked about in other threads.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #22  
bludevil's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 1, 2004
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
19.7--not too shabby!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #23  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally posted by bludevil@November 12, 2004, 10:03 PM
19.7--not too shabby!
So at least one car got tuned correctly for gas mileage?? Or is it maybe...a math error??


:scratch:
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 10:11 PM
  #24  
USA-Adam's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Uhh, I dunno exactly who said it, but putting in a higher octane fuel is not going to damage the engine. The engine comptuer has knock control sensors .. you can even run regular fuel in most premium requiring cars and they'll run okay because the computer will compensate. There isn't really any damage you could do if you ran higher octane in a lower compression motor. Just the other way around .. but even then it wouldn't make much difference.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 10:35 PM
  #25  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Originally posted by USA-Adam@November 12, 2004, 11:14 PM
Uhh, I dunno exactly who said it, but putting in a higher octane fuel is not going to damage the engine. The engine comptuer has knock control sensors .. you can even run regular fuel in most premium requiring cars and they'll run okay because the computer will compensate. There isn't really any damage you could do if you ran higher octane in a lower compression motor. Just the other way around .. but even then it wouldn't make much difference.
Yeah that's what I thought too.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #26  
Paris MkVI's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 18, 2004
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 143
From: Virginia
Originally posted by M1Rifle@November 12, 2004, 8:38 PM

Older cars have more carbon deposits which lead to hot spots, leading to pinging.
Older cars also have older EGR valves. If you have a poor-fuctioning, or non-functioning EGR valve, you can enjoy all manner of noise from the engine unless you raise the octane to slow combustion and help avoid pre-ignition. Combined with hot spots, this is one of the biggest causes of pinging and "valve-rattle".

If a manufacturer recommends lower octane gasoline, there is seldom any advantage at all to spending more for higher octane. It's the fuel industry telling us what we want to hear that sells the premium fuels, with the exception of engines that require it according to the builder.

There's actually a math formula based on displacement, compression ratio, etc. that tells you what fuel the engine will require. If I could just remember it. . .
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #27  
JustAnotherDude's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Soooo......how will it run on 95 octane?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #28  
orthoguy's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 97svtgoin05gt+November 13, 2004, 12:05 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (97svtgoin05gt @ November 13, 2004, 12:05 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bludevil@November 12, 2004, 10:03 PM
19.7--not too shabby!
So at least one car got tuned correctly for gas mileage?? Or is it maybe...a math error??


:scratch: [/b][/quote]
No math error, I calculated it myself, of coarse i forgot to check my on board computer (DUH) and it stated the same numbers.

Strickly highway last weekend I think it was in the low 20's. After I switched over to amsoil, I think gas MPG improved a little bit. I think I was getting 15-17 combined before the change. I know for sure my F-150 got better also when I switched over.

Mike
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NC14GT
Repair and Service Help
29
Feb 20, 2023 09:42 AM
Mrmiles1369
Repair and Service Help
2
Sep 11, 2015 07:23 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 PM.