2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Long waits and lack of planning at Ford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #41  
Webba's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2005
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
I would guess it would several billion or more to open another mustang plant or create a new assembly line. Could even be higher when you factor in their suppliers opening up new plants, and their suppliers, and so on. Id love to see it happen but it wont.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #42  
Patience's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 1, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Webba@June 3, 2005, 1:36 PM
I would guess it would several billion or more to open another mustang plant or create a new assembly line. Could even be higher when you factor in their suppliers opening up new plants, and their suppliers, and so on. Id love to see it happen but it wont.

i would think they could have converted wixom, home of the LS and the Thunderbird---true they'd need tooling but at least the structure, logistics and resources would be in place---
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #43  
antdog's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2005
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Webba@June 3, 2005, 1:36 PM
I would guess it would several billion or more to open another mustang plant or create a new assembly line. Could even be higher when you factor in their suppliers opening up new plants, and their suppliers, and so on. Id love to see it happen but it wont.
To add to this, what will you do with all the employee that had to trained, and then retrained. Or even layed off because of lower demand. There's a lot to consider. Hirer more people just to blow them out later, that's just wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #44  
Webba's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 23, 2005
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
I agree antdog but unfortunately that is the new American Way so I doubt they care about that. I think it is just matter of $$$ and if they decided to do it Monday they would be almost a year away from running a new line given tooling lead times, having specialized equipment made, etc. Seeing as how I am still c/u as of June 2nd Id love to see it happen but waiting is sooooo much fun!
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #45  
Flyinlow's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
One thing they could do to help Cafe is to put 6 speeds in them instead of 5 speeds. Or they could just pay the fines.

BMW, Mercedes regularly pay cafe fines.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #46  
Burke0011's Avatar
Big Falken Tires
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 1
Originally posted by moc1976@June 3, 2005, 11:57 AM
No matter what you guys say, you can't convince me there's no way to make more GTs in a way that will still be profitable.

So go ahead and tell me how I'm wrong cause Ford couldn't know that there would be this much demand, and there's nothing they can do to build more in a profitable manner, but its all a bunch of BS if you ask me.
Well then the point is moot then now isn't it?

I would guess this thread will die very quickly then.....
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #47  
NuPony05's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2005
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
There is obviously a much greater demand for the new Mustang than Ford might have anticipated. And since they are building at their own pace, demand will outpace supply. THAT is the reason the dealers can charge $2K-$5K markups. You can bet your buns that the dealers don't want Ford to increase the production too much. Some maybe, but not so much that supply starts to equal demand. That just means MSRP only for the dealer vice the big mark-ups.
My wait was just a bit over 3 months (see signature). And it took a month from build to delivery, with the biggest delay being leaving the plant after assembly. I think 12 weeks may be close to the average wait. I've seen shorter and longer waits, but I think those are more the exception, and mainly due to dealer allocation. One thing I think Ford definitely needs to fix is the allocation process. It should not matter how many Mustangs a particular dealer sold in a previous year if the dealer has taken an order from a customer. That is a SOLD order. The allocations should only apply to "dealer stock". Just my humble opinion.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #48  
jsheehan's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: August 2, 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 2
Originally posted by NuPony05@June 3, 2005, 5:45 PM
One thing I think Ford definitely needs to fix is the allocation process. It should not matter how many Mustangs a particular dealer sold in a previous year if the dealer has taken an order from a customer. That is a SOLD order. The allocations should only apply to "dealer stock". Just my humble opinion.
The problem with this is that now you will have every dealer slapping someone's name on their stock orders to get them built first. The only posible way I could see that working would be if te dealer submited proof of the sale to Ford, and that the sale was binding. otherwise, the dealers could just say the imaginary person whose name they put on the order backed out of the deal. The problem with this is that no person in their right mind is going to make a sale final before the car is even built yet. If people can't order directly from Ford, then the dealer allocation system is what we are stuck with.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tukatz
Road Trips
23
Oct 13, 2023 10:01 AM
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
Nov 3, 2022 08:50 PM
jc46002003
Repair and Service Help
70
Apr 15, 2016 03:00 PM
bigaaron
1994-2004 V-8
6
Aug 22, 2015 12:06 PM
retiredf5
Ecoboost
0
Jul 21, 2015 05:54 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 AM.