2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Larger displacement on the way

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #21  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
There is no replacement for displacement It would only take a minimal ammount of extra room for the 'footprint' of the engine, say about an extra 1" all around to make the block low, with room to spare and get 6.5+L out of it. It should not weigh any sizeable ammount more either(another common misconception). The stroke on the 5.4 is an obnoxious 4"+ There is plenty of room in the new Stang for it(the hurricane).


I would add to the line:
6.2 Hurricane 427 sedan-(Duratec 35 base engine) For 07. AWD by 08
Add the D35 to the 500/Freestyle/Fusion/Escape(225-260 hp for the small-larger vehicles) by 06
Hybrid Fusion and Freestyle by 07
4.0 3v and 4.6 3v for Explorer by 06
Build a Mustang-based wild Forty-nine coupe/vert with the 6.2 For 07
Build a couple luxo coupes-verts(Cougar mild/Conti wild for Merc-Lincoln) by 08
Add the Bronco with the D35 and a small diesel for 07-08
All the F-series/Expeds get the 6.2(5.4 3v base) By 08

Plus all the other goodies comming down the pipe, but thats just me
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #22  
Dr Iven's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MedVader@September 13, 2004, 5:50 PM
I think they'll go a little bigger than the competition which at this point is the Hemi.
I wouldn't be too sure about that. The HEMI (semi-hemi, really) is definitely a powerful engine, but none of the cars it is used in is fast. It's a shame that they take a powerful engine and can only find a place for it in cars that weigh in at at least 4,000+ with driver. Not only that, but the HEMI is a pretty expensive option in the 300 and Magnum, as well. The truth is that there isn't really any true competition for the 4.6 3V right now.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:46 PM
  #23  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
The 6.2 is targeting 425 hp N/A with simillar to 5.4 gas mileage. The idea is to make Dodge and Chevy have to start again to catch up. Chevy has been milking the same engine for 45+years. The semi-hemi is all but topped out at 360hp in a streetable cost effective trim. You cant add an extra pair of cams to the semi-hemi and cheby stuff. This will be a cammer with displacement 2v/3v/4v DOHC, pick your weapon.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #24  
oldskl427's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 6, 2004
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MedVader+September 13, 2004, 5:28 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MedVader @ September 13, 2004, 5:28 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kevinb120@September 13, 2004, 3:06 PM
Hurricane is an all new motor. Ive said it before that the modulars have a very finite lifespan left. It was supposed to be a FWD compact V8 and Ford ran out of development money. The hurricane is to be a 6.2L motor with room to go either way in displacement. The 6.2 will be a much lower deck height as well(so it will fit easilly in a car). The 4.6 had no room to bore out, so they raised the stroke, and its an extremely tall engine, they had to use a dry sump for the GT for it to fit.
That's right. The mod motor architecture is a dead end for large displacement. The only way is more stroke and thus taller and taller motors. I think the 5.4 has a longer stroke than the BB460s and Chevy 502. I'm amazed they got 6500rpm out the GT motor.

The new Hurricane series will have much wider bore spacing allowing for big bore short stroke motors for RWD. Combine that with 3V OHC and you've got a high revving powerhouse. And once you change bore spacing, you can't use a previous series motors' heads. [/b][/quote]

Big bore...short stroke...high revving powerhouse
That's exactly what I wanted to hear...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #25  
oldskl427's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 6, 2004
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Originally posted by kevinb120@September 13, 2004, 10:49 PM
The 6.2 is targeting 425 hp N/A with simillar to 5.4 gas mileage. The idea is to make Dodge and Chevy have to start again to catch up. Chevy has been milking the same engine for 45+years. The semi-hemi is all but topped out at 360hp in a streetable cost effective trim. You cant add an extra pair of cams to the semi-hemi and cheby stuff. This will be a cammer with displacement 2v/3v/4v DOHC, pick your weapon.
That doesn't sound too bad either
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:26 PM
  #26  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
would be nice if kevin is right. guess we will have to wait and see. shame ford didnt start this engine program sooner to be ready for the 05 stang and F150
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:38 PM
  #27  
Brian302505's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Maybe with the new engine, with a smaller deck height. Possibly a SRT-8 Fighter as in SVT LS??!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #28  
The Deviant One's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 7, 2004
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Maybe with this new engine in a mustang, we could see history repeat itself....as in ten years ago,when the SN95 came out and had the 5.0 for the 94-95 model year and was phased out of factory stangs and replaced by the 4.6 modular in 96.
Also, with this new big dsplacement engine in stangs, we could see a rebirth of the BOSS 302, 351 (perhaps 429?) and maybe even a MACH 1 with a 351 or larger cube motor in it and pushing 500+hp.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #29  
oldskl427's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 6, 2004
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Originally posted by conv_stang@September 13, 2004, 11:29 PM
would be nice if kevin is right. guess we will have to wait and see. shame ford didnt start this engine program sooner to be ready for the 05 stang and F150
Agreed

I'm guessing we'll see the first examples of these engines in an SE (SVT or Shelby) followed by a more civilized version in the GT and other models.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 06:31 AM
  #30  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally posted by kevinb120@September 13, 2004, 3:06 PM
The hurricane is to be a 6.2L motor with room to go either way in displacement. The 6.2 will be a much lower deck height as well(so it will fit easilly in a car). The 4.6 had no room to bore out, so they raised the stroke, and its an extremely tall engine, they had to use a dry sump for the GT for it to fit.
Do you have any facts to back this up?

The rumors that I have seen are that the 6.2 Huricane is a scaled up 5.4L that has a 110mm bore spacing (vs. 100mm of the 4.6 & 5.4) and it uses the same 105.66 mm stroke.

If this is the case, the maximum bore that a Huricane could have would be about 100.2mm (~3.94").

A low deck version of the Huricane, 90mm stroke, 100 mm bore x 90mm stroke - 5.7L, 345 cu inch would be the ticket.


Do you have any solid info. as to what the bore & stroke capabilities of the Huricane really are?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 07:02 AM
  #31  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
well if its an OHC motor, im sure you could think of it as a scaled up 5.4, the idea is the same. I heard it was to be all new and much more flexible then the modulars now. Scaling up the 5.4 wouldnt solve much of anything and would be short-term thinking. Anyone with half a brain would avoid such a limited design as the modulars now.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #32  
MedVader's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Originally posted by V10+September 14, 2004, 6:34 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (V10 @ September 14, 2004, 6:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kevinb120@September 13, 2004, 3:06 PM
The hurricane is to be a 6.2L motor with room to go either way in displacement. The 6.2 will be a much lower deck height as well(so it will fit easilly in a car). The 4.6 had no room to bore out, so they raised the stroke, and its an extremely tall engine, they had to use a dry sump for the GT for it to fit.
Do you have any facts to back this up?

The rumors that I have seen are that the 6.2 Huricane is a scaled up 5.4L that has a 110mm bore spacing (vs. 100mm of the 4.6 & 5.4) and it uses the same 105.66 mm stroke.

If this is the case, the maximum bore that a Huricane could have would be about 100.2mm (~3.94").

A low deck version of the Huricane, 90mm stroke, 100 mm bore x 90mm stroke - 5.7L, 345 cu inch would be the ticket.


Do you have any solid info. as to what the bore & stroke capabilities of the Huricane really are? [/b][/quote]
Well the LS2 is still a 4.4" bore spacing and the Hemi is 4.46"

If the current mod motors are 100mm that is 3.94" and an increase to 110mm would be 4.33"

So why the heck would you go smaller than the current competition when bore spacing was the major weakness of the mod motors to begin with? Maybe the increase to 110mm doesn't require total retooling of all the engine facilities.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #33  
jc69Stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Bigger is better. Big Bore, short stroke, sounds alot like the old 427s.

Need I say more?

I look forward to seeing the development on it. But if it is all new, 07 sounds a bit early on it being in production doesn't it?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Evil_Capri
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:56 PM
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
Sep 17, 2015 07:38 AM
lowblustang00
2005-2009 Mustang
21
Sep 5, 2015 12:18 PM
TxBoss23
GT350
9
Jul 16, 2015 11:27 AM
Dan
General Vehicle Discussion/News
15
Jan 30, 2005 07:30 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.