Geico smokes LOTS of crack!
5/11/05, 07:18 AM
#21
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by MrMorden@May 11, 2005, 6:30 AM
You CAN get inexpensive GOOD insurance. Progressive usually crushes Geico's prices, and they have outstanding customer service.
You CAN get inexpensive GOOD insurance. Progressive usually crushes Geico's prices, and they have outstanding customer service.
Back to Topic, why does DraftHorsePower's insurance company have to pay for the accident? Isn't it the other guys fault? If that is the case, I think DraftHorsePower and his insurance company should only have to beat up the other guy's insurance company for some money.
5/11/05, 07:20 AM
#22
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Originally posted by Kluski+May 11, 2005, 7:21 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Kluski @ May 11, 2005, 7:21 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-MrMorden@May 11, 2005, 6:30 AM
You CAN get inexpensive GOOD insurance. Progressive usually crushes Geico's prices, and they have outstanding customer service.
You CAN get inexpensive GOOD insurance. Progressive usually crushes Geico's prices, and they have outstanding customer service.
Back to Topic, why does DraftHorsePower's insurance company have to pay for the accident? Isn't it the other guys fault? If that is the case, I think DraftHorsePower and his insurance company should only have to beat up the other guy's insurance company for some money.
[/b][/quote]
Depends on your state, some states have a no-fault policy, basically meaning, regardless who caused the accident, your insurance company pays for the damages of your car and the other persons insurance pays for the damages of the other persons car.
5/11/05, 07:24 AM
#23
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 17, 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what i think happens.... is my insurance company settles on the car, and will then go after the guys insurance company to get their money back. They also pay my medical, and then go after the other guy for reimbursement.
Because i am injured, the at-fault insurance company is also then required by law to provide me with a settlement.
Because i am injured, the at-fault insurance company is also then required by law to provide me with a settlement.
5/11/05, 12:28 PM
#26
Bullitt Member
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Montrose@May 11, 2005, 12:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
5/11/05, 12:33 PM
#27
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OMG So sorry Emilee! You have been through so much already with your poor car! I hate that more problems are emerging!!!
You go down the line and let them all have it.. and have it good!!
We're all thinking about ya!
You go down the line and let them all have it.. and have it good!!
We're all thinking about ya!
5/11/05, 01:05 PM
#28
Cobra Member
Join Date: January 27, 2005
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Montrose@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
5/11/05, 01:48 PM
#29
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: April 8, 2005
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by THRUST_+May 11, 2005, 1:08 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(THRUST_ @ May 11, 2005, 1:08 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Montrose@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
[/b][/quote]
I second that Thrust!
5/11/05, 03:16 PM
#30
Cobra Member
Join Date: March 29, 2005
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by southern_stang_girlee+May 11, 2005, 12:51 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(southern_stang_girlee @ May 11, 2005, 12:51 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
I don't think you recall correctly
Originally posted by THRUST_@May 11, 2005, 1:08 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
I don't think you recall correctly
I second that Thrust![/b][/quote]
I will third that
5/11/05, 04:00 PM
#31
V6 Member
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry about your ride, that must have hurt. glad your alright. You may want to check out Wawanesa if you have a good record. I pay $1500 a year for full coverage with 300 deductable all in mid level claim for 4 cars
1991 Toyota Highlander V6
1998 Volvo S70
1990 5.0 V8 Mustang HB
2005 V6 Mustang
And the 90 GT is the most expensive out of all of at $460 a year.
1991 Toyota Highlander V6
1998 Volvo S70
1990 5.0 V8 Mustang HB
2005 V6 Mustang
And the 90 GT is the most expensive out of all of at $460 a year.
5/11/05, 04:03 PM
#32
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by Faber+May 11, 2005, 3:19 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Faber @ May 11, 2005, 3:19 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
I don't think you recall correctly
I second that Thrust!
Originally posted by southern_stang_girlee@May 11, 2005, 12:51 PM
Originally posted by THRUST_@May 11, 2005, 1:08 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
I don't think you recall correctly
I second that Thrust![/b][/quote]
I will forth that
. That photo was NOT shopped!!!!!!!
5/11/05, 04:08 PM
#33
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: May 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had Geico years ago. I made a claim for one claim, (my fault) a front fender and a grill on a pickup. They paid the claim and promptly dropped me. :scratch:
I have had Allied for years and they are reasonable. They are only charging me $800 per year for the new Mustang GT Vert.
I have had Allied for years and they are reasonable. They are only charging me $800 per year for the new Mustang GT Vert.
5/11/05, 04:34 PM
#35
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by holderca1+May 11, 2005, 6:16 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(holderca1 @ May 11, 2005, 6:16 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
i don't think it is legal. Idaho state law states bumper height on 4wd vehicles must be like 54" or lower from the bottom of the bumper
Originally posted by DraftHorsePower@May 10, 2005, 5:56 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-TN615
<!--QuoteBegin-TN615
@May 10, 2005, 5:35 PM
Are you suing?
I'm not one of those people who are for suing for any old thing....
But...
That truck is so high.... I bet it's not legal.
Are you suing?
I'm not one of those people who are for suing for any old thing....
But...
That truck is so high.... I bet it's not legal.
i don't think it is legal. Idaho state law states bumper height on 4wd vehicles must be like 54" or lower from the bottom of the bumper
Edit: Actually, I know its legal, the height of the Mustang is 54", and its well below the roofline.
[/b][/quote]
That is just utterly ridiculous. The ride height law needs to be lowered, considerably, to where a car's bumper is able to hit another car's bumper. Why place a bumper on a car if it's gonna get hit in its rear window?
5/11/05, 04:35 PM
#36
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 05fordgt+May 11, 2005, 3:06 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(05fordgt @ May 11, 2005, 3:06 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
I don't think you recall correctly
I second that Thrust!
I will third that
Originally posted by Faber@May 11, 2005, 3:19 PM
Originally posted by southern_stang_girlee@May 11, 2005, 12:51 PM
Originally posted by THRUST_@May 11, 2005, 1:08 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
<!--QuoteBegin-Montrose
@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
I don't think you recall correctly
I second that Thrust!I will third that
. That photo was NOT shopped!!!!!!![/b][/quote]
uhhh... that is the exact same picture dude.
5/11/05, 05:40 PM
#37
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 17, 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Montrose@May 11, 2005, 11:09 AM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
why is it that anything dramatic nowadays is labeled as a photo-chop??
5/11/05, 05:44 PM
#38
Bullitt Member
Join Date: March 20, 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Montrose@May 11, 2005, 1:09 PM
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
The picture of the truck on the rear of the yellow Mustang was photo shopped. That is not an actual shot of the truck that hit the car, if I recall correctly.
5/12/05, 01:00 AM
#39
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Bauhston
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by thezeppelin8+May 11, 2005, 6:37 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(thezeppelin8 @ May 11, 2005, 6:37 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
i don't think it is legal. Idaho state law states bumper height on 4wd vehicles must be like 54" or lower from the bottom of the bumper
By looking at that picture, it looks like the ride height is legal, it doesn't look like the bottom of the bumper is more than 4 and half feet off the ground, thats pretty high.
Edit: Actually, I know its legal, the height of the Mustang is 54", and its well below the roofline.
Originally posted by holderca1@May 11, 2005, 6:16 AM
Originally posted by DraftHorsePower@May 10, 2005, 5:56 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-TN615
<!--QuoteBegin-TN615
@May 10, 2005, 5:35 PM
Are you suing?
I'm not one of those people who are for suing for any old thing....
But...
That truck is so high.... I bet it's not legal.
Are you suing?
I'm not one of those people who are for suing for any old thing....
But...
That truck is so high.... I bet it's not legal.
i don't think it is legal. Idaho state law states bumper height on 4wd vehicles must be like 54" or lower from the bottom of the bumper
By looking at that picture, it looks like the ride height is legal, it doesn't look like the bottom of the bumper is more than 4 and half feet off the ground, thats pretty high.
Edit: Actually, I know its legal, the height of the Mustang is 54", and its well below the roofline.
[/b][/quote]
Can you imagine that bumper hitting your head in a T-bone. You would be toast even if they were only going 20mph.
5/12/05, 05:17 AM
#40
After all these years,
My C/T still sucks!
My C/T still sucks!
Join Date: May 5, 2004
Location: Orlando(DP!) Florida
Posts: 7,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have kept Nationwide around for years, Adore them.
Zero Deductibles, and they have always treated me right.
Always been scared of insurance companies without offices.
Emilee- good luck, I hope you fry the jerk who totaled your baby.
Zero Deductibles, and they have always treated me right.
Always been scared of insurance companies without offices.
Emilee- good luck, I hope you fry the jerk who totaled your baby.