2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Ferbuary a Rough Month for Mustang Sales.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/7/08 | 09:48 AM
  #21  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
It's hovering around $1.04 - $1.06 a litre in Ontario, Canada right now for 87.

It's probably because of all the SubPrime mortgages...

It's blamed for everything else, why should this be any different

Last edited by Boomer; 3/7/08 at 09:49 AM.
Old 3/7/08 | 10:07 AM
  #22  
Rampant's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by slipnotovk
after $4, i think i might be selling my precious pony and going with a 4 cylinder sipper. its just getting ridiculous
Just because it got me thinking, I decided to do the math....

At $4/gallon for 1,000 mi. (roughly 1 month), let's compare 18 mpg to 30 mpg.

1,000 mi. / 18mpg x $4 = $222
1,000 mi. / 30mpg x $4 = $133
Difference = $89

That is assuming $4/gallon and you can get a car with 30mpg. The Prius gets around 35-40mpg in the real world, even though it is rated at 46 combined EPA MPG.

I always though the mpg thing was overstated and the saving wouldn't be that great, but $89/mo. is a descent chunk of change. It still would be worth it for me to drive a car I like (love), but still, I can see how it adds to the costs of the vehicle to the point where it would turn a lot of people off.

Now, if we can just do something about the continuous record-breaking profits the oil companies are experiencing. Clearly, they don't NEED to sell oil at that price. But that is a different topic altogether......
Old 3/7/08 | 10:42 AM
  #23  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by Rampant
Just because it got me thinking, I decided to do the math....

At $4/gallon for 1,000 mi. (roughly 1 month), let's compare 18 mpg to 30 mpg.

1,000 mi. / 18mpg x $4 = $222
1,000 mi. / 30mpg x $4 = $133
Difference = $89

That is assuming $4/gallon and you can get a car with 30mpg. The Prius gets around 35-40mpg in the real world, even though it is rated at 46 combined EPA MPG.

I always though the mpg thing was overstated and the saving wouldn't be that great, but $89/mo. is a descent chunk of change. It still would be worth it for me to drive a car I like (love), but still, I can see how it adds to the costs of the vehicle to the point where it would turn a lot of people off.
I think that's a good point: is it worth it to you spend more to drive a car your passionate about driving? For people who think of cars as an appliance like a refrigerator, probably not. So they drive around in their econocubes.
Old 3/7/08 | 10:43 AM
  #24  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by Boomer
It's hovering around $1.04 - $1.06 a litre in Ontario, Canada right now for 87.

It's probably because of all the SubPrime mortgages...

It's blamed for everything else, why should this be any different
I blame Global Warming!
Old 3/7/08 | 11:22 AM
  #25  
slipnotovk's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
From: Staten Island, NY
Originally Posted by Rampant
Just because it got me thinking, I decided to do the math....

At $4/gallon for 1,000 mi. (roughly 1 month), let's compare 18 mpg to 30 mpg.

1,000 mi. / 18mpg x $4 = $222
1,000 mi. / 30mpg x $4 = $133
Difference = $89
my commute is about 50 miles every day. 5 times a day so roughly 1000 miles a month. times that by 12 and ur lookin at atleast a $1,100 difference a year. thats just commuting to and from work. its not just the money though, its the principle. the fact that these oil companies are just raking in the money off of us hard working people is sickening. something needs to be done. contrary to what the government is saying, yes the US is in a recession. an american dollar is losing its worth and it continues to decline.

SUPPOSEDLY GM is going to release their Chevrolet Volt. if they ever did i think id buy it. an all electric sports car? hell yea.

sorry about hijacking the thread, i just had to vent alittle bit.......just filled up at the pump ahahahaha
Old 3/7/08 | 12:52 PM
  #26  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
FYI, US Dollar value alone compared to other currencies hasn't been indicative of US economic well being since we came off the gold standard.... Are things bleak? Depends on how well the Federal Reserve handles the banks in the next 6 months.... And it's hardly just the oil companies... how much taxes (city, county, state, federal) are on each gallon of gas you buy? Are you even able to find out? Guess what - the gas station legally cannot tell you. Have those fuel taxes ever gone down?

Is driving a car that gets twice the gas mileage worth it? Depends on a lot of variables.
But for me... I drive around 15,000 miles a year, if I assume gas at $3.25/g (what am I? a fortune teller? meh.) and assume 20mpg for my GT (I average less). That gas will cost me $12,187.50 over five years. With price being equal I would save $6,093.75 if my car got 40 mpg. Assuming diesel price of $4 a gallon, and 40mpg (fairly low end, diesel hybrids in two years should be 60-75 realistically), that savings narrows to $4,687.5 over five years.

For $6k extra fuel costs over five years, I'm happy with my Mustang GT as a daily driver. In three years I'll buy something that performs roughly the same (but won't sound nearly as good) that gets 40-60mpg and keep the Mustang for fun and novelty.

Last edited by Dixie_Flatline; 3/7/08 at 12:54 PM.
Old 3/7/08 | 01:03 PM
  #27  
mhconley's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Discovery Bay, CA
We're currently paying $3.50 to $3.90 a gallon in the SFBay area.

Martin
Old 3/7/08 | 01:09 PM
  #28  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
Originally Posted by mhconley
We're currently paying $3.50 to $3.90 a gallon in the SFBay area.

Martin

Lol, yeah, but that's like in downtown Chicago... you pay an extra $0.25 - $0.50 if you actually buy the gas in the city. Tends to be combination of market geography and city/county tax levies. So most people don't buy their gas in the city if they can help it....
Old 3/7/08 | 02:38 PM
  #29  
the procrastinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
I would have to agree that it's more the current economy that's hurting sales than what features the current Mustang offers or does not offer. I waited a year before I took the plunge for this reason. I just didn't need to be saddled with a car payment then. Yeah, the Mustang could use a refreshening but not a radical one. Change the exterior mirrors (make them "body-colored" for crissakes!) and offer more in the way of exterior color choice beyond the latest red. But hey, it's still a pretty car.
Old 3/7/08 | 03:29 PM
  #30  
c25sailor's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 9, 2007
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
If you want that 400 HP vehicle. Whipple it!!!. You can have your Ford dealer install it (when CARB finally approves it) and get some warranty too. That gets you 400 hp+ and if you want a little more and to stay safe get the HO kit -- but put the 8 lb pulley on -- that will get you 400 at the wheels. You can have what you want!!

I think that you're seeing the lack of a refresh -- but I also think there was a huge pent up demand for this car in 05 and 06 -- + the competition doesn't go away. Nothing is selling wonderfully. My dealer has a GT 500 coupe, a Shelby GT Coupe and a Bullitt on the floor -- probably can buy any one of the three for no more than sticker -- so if you love these cars, which you should if you're here -- it is a great time to buy.
Old 3/8/08 | 10:57 AM
  #31  
Hani's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 26, 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Qatar
Originally Posted by mhconley
We're currently paying $3.50 to $3.90 a gallon in the SFBay area.

Martin
These prices are horrible.. we pay $ 0.83 per gallon (93 Octane).. this is why V8 and V12 cars are affordable in here..

I feel sorry for you guys...
Old 3/8/08 | 11:22 AM
  #32  
Cavero's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2006
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 128
Originally Posted by V10
I pretty much agree with you.

Although the S197 Mustang is, as you say "a very, very good basic car", it's still a throwback to yesteryear. While we have Mustang fanatics that cry that they "don't want any fancy features", reality is the market for no frills performance cars is VERY small. The market today demands a MUCH more refined vehicle than the Mustang is with all the comfort features. This is not 1965 anymore, today you do NOT have to sacrifice comfort and luxury to get performance.

I also agree that Ford's refusal to give us a model between the GT and GT-500 is shear stupidity and is costing lots of sales.

But much of the Mustang's sales decline has been in the V6 model, which again lacks the comfort, amentities and performance the market demands.
Thats basically what the Bullitt and Shelby GT are. But the **** Shelby name makes the SGT almost as much as the GT500 and not any faster than a normal GT with about $2500 is mods (intake, tune, suspension) because well...THAT'S ALL IT IS!! C'mon Ford, give us 350-400hp. After all, how hard can it be?
Old 3/9/08 | 12:42 AM
  #33  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,201
Likes: 17
From: Bristol, TN
Didn't Ford cut down on the rental fleet sales? If alot of the sales loss was in the V6 segment (and I know Ford pumped alot of Mustangs onto rental car lots) then this may have accounted for a good fraction of the sales down turn.
Old 3/9/08 | 02:38 PM
  #34  
I-70 west's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2006
Posts: 912
Likes: 17
From: Missouri, USA
Lots of 07 new Mustangs at the local dealers around here with 5 Gs off the window sticker.
Most are plain jane V6s.
Old 3/9/08 | 03:40 PM
  #35  
shaun_beauchamp's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 16, 2006
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Rampant
Just because it got me thinking, I decided to do the math....

At $4/gallon for 1,000 mi. (roughly 1 month), let's compare 18 mpg to 30 mpg.

1,000 mi. / 18mpg x $4 = $222
1,000 mi. / 30mpg x $4 = $133
Difference = $89

That is assuming $4/gallon and you can get a car with 30mpg. The Prius gets around 35-40mpg in the real world, even though it is rated at 46 combined EPA MPG.

I always though the mpg thing was overstated and the saving wouldn't be that great, but $89/mo. is a descent chunk of change. It still would be worth it for me to drive a car I like (love), but still, I can see how it adds to the costs of the vehicle to the point where it would turn a lot of people off.

Now, if we can just do something about the continuous record-breaking profits the oil companies are experiencing. Clearly, they don't NEED to sell oil at that price. But that is a different topic altogether......
Your better off just keeping the Mustang. I have a couple of cars, including 4, 6 and 8 cylinders. My 4 cylinder Subaru Legacy gets 24 MPG. My 06 Mustang GT 5-spd gets 22 MPG. These are both "mix" city and hwy driving. On the Highway, my Mustang gets 27 MPG and my Subaru gets 26. Four cylinders are good if the car is small. Soon as you start over taxing a little engine you start burning more fuel. Looking at the Infinity Q7 recently in Milwaukee Auto Show, I found that the V8 version and the V6 version were only 2 MPG different.

If you really have to save money on fuel, buy a motorcycle or scooter. You can't just put a smaller engine in a car and expect miracles. You have to downsize everything. The best power to weight ratio usually lends to decent mileage. Look at Vettes, a 6 spd manual can get up to 37 MPG Hwy. Aerodynamic, light and V8 powered!
Old 3/9/08 | 07:44 PM
  #36  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bob
Didn't Ford cut down on the rental fleet sales? If alot of the sales loss was in the V6 segment (and I know Ford pumped alot of Mustangs onto rental car lots) then this may have accounted for a good fraction of the sales down turn.
Yes Ford has cut rental sales, but they did that when the S197 came out in 2004, so the recent decline in Mustang sales have nothign to do with less rental sales.
Old 3/9/08 | 07:46 PM
  #37  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by nynvolt
I think this is more to do with the current economy than the S197 losing popularity. I don't know how it is in other states but in California I know just about everyones feeling the pinch. Gas prices are killing peoples disposable income which has shrunk with companies downsizing and cutting back hours. Alot of people jumped in too deep into houses they really could not afford and others losing big time on houses they hoped to flip. So now everyones tightening up.

The company I have worked at for 15 years has cut hours and laid people off, this is the first time in the 15 years I've been there thats happened. We have had wage and new hire freezes before but never cut overtime and people before.
If it's the economy, please explain why Mustang sales are down 28%, but the total sales of all vehicles are down less than 5%.
Old 3/10/08 | 09:51 AM
  #38  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by V10
If it's the economy, please explain why Mustang sales are down 28%, but the total sales of all vehicles are down less than 5%.
Because people are buying more "practical" and "fuel efficient" cars rather than sporty cars. If the economy is poor and gas prices are high, people will not spend on what is perceived as a "toy", such as a sporty car.

350Z sales were down 29.9% in Feb. So it's not just the Mustang. G37 sales were up, however, most likely due to the debut of the new design.
Old 3/10/08 | 10:32 AM
  #39  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
Originally Posted by shaun_beauchamp
You can't just put a smaller engine in a car and expect miracles. You have to downsize everything. The best power to weight ratio usually lends to decent mileage.
Bingo! That's exactly why I don't see Ford putting a 4 cylinder in the S197. There are better technologies out there now.
Old 3/10/08 | 11:34 AM
  #40  
lodom's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 11, 2004
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Everyboy's made some good points and I think the summation of all of them are the reason sales are off. Like most folks, I've seen really felt the impact of higher gas prices. I'm now paying $42 to a week to fill up my Accord, when I used to never make it to $20 to fill up a few years ago. Gas averaged around $1.20 a gallon for 20+ years, and now people are feeling the pinch, since it has hovered at over $3 per gallon for a long time. My annual merit raise didn't cover my increasing expenses, and I'm now loosing financial ground.

I also don't think the revised EPA figures printed on the sticker are helping much, since all cars at have lower estimates. The stock market is tanking, 401k values are plummeting, inflation is on the rise, and equity in peoples homes is vanishing. Loans are getting harder tom come by, and as a result people are thinking twice before making a major purchase.

A lot of this is hopefully cyclical, but something we haven't seen in years. I don't think we'll ever see the relatively cheap gas prices we saw years ago with global demand on the rise.


Quick Reply: Ferbuary a Rough Month for Mustang Sales.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM.