Electronic Throttle
#21
also the size of the throttle body will have an effect on throttle response. the BMW M3 other than its not a mustang was one of the finest automobiles ive ever driven. if i could only get over 49,000 sticker. and throttle was NOW. im sure for a sports car ford will get it straight and the throttle response will be good. a good ETC will be faster than a cable setup
#22
Originally posted by conv_stang@June 20, 2004, 10:58 PM
also the size of the throttle body will have an effect on throttle response. the BMW M3 other than its not a mustang was one of the finest automobiles ive ever driven. if i could only get over 49,000 sticker. and throttle was NOW. im sure for a sports car ford will get it straight and the throttle response will be good. a good ETC will be faster than a cable setup
also the size of the throttle body will have an effect on throttle response. the BMW M3 other than its not a mustang was one of the finest automobiles ive ever driven. if i could only get over 49,000 sticker. and throttle was NOW. im sure for a sports car ford will get it straight and the throttle response will be good. a good ETC will be faster than a cable setup
#23
An electronic throttle shouldn't be troublesome
I have heard that many people don't like electronic controlled brakes, as they don't relay the same feel as physically linked lines. Just read any reviews on the SL500 and you hear of the belly aching...whereas I haven't heard much bad press about the electronic throttles
I have heard that many people don't like electronic controlled brakes, as they don't relay the same feel as physically linked lines. Just read any reviews on the SL500 and you hear of the belly aching...whereas I haven't heard much bad press about the electronic throttles
#24
Originally posted by TomServo92+June 20, 2004, 5:31 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TomServo92 @ June 20, 2004, 5:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Robert@June 20, 2004, 5:18 PM
Drive by wire is actually supposed to provide much better throttle response, since there's NO cable action delay whatsoever. Also, no mechanical linkages to ever wear out.
I've driven the new BMW 545, and Acura TL and TSX - and none of those cars had any lag whatsoever - in fact, they all perform really well - epecially the TSX which only has a 4 banger. The 4 banger does produce 200 bhp however.
Drive by wire is actually supposed to provide much better throttle response, since there's NO cable action delay whatsoever. Also, no mechanical linkages to ever wear out.
I've driven the new BMW 545, and Acura TL and TSX - and none of those cars had any lag whatsoever - in fact, they all perform really well - epecially the TSX which only has a 4 banger. The 4 banger does produce 200 bhp however.
The Ford engineer who was at Foxboro used to work on the Lincoln LS and is very familiar with it. He told me that although the 05 Stang uses essentially the same PCM & ETC setup and same auto trannie, the Mustang vehicle calibration engineers have spend a huge amount of time tuning the PCM code and calibration parameters. He said the the responsiveness of both the V8 engine and the auto trannie were great and were improved over the LS.
Sounds like some of you are worrying about nothing.
#25
Originally posted by 05Pony@June 18, 2004, 11:47 AM
My wifes 2002 Tibute just had that sensor go bad at 35000 miles, it caused wierd shifting. :angry: But, we did not notice much of a lag when pushing hard on the gas pedel.
My wifes 2002 Tibute just had that sensor go bad at 35000 miles, it caused wierd shifting. :angry: But, we did not notice much of a lag when pushing hard on the gas pedel.
#26
Originally posted by montreal ponies+June 21, 2004, 7:59 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (montreal ponies @ June 21, 2004, 7:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-05Pony@June 18, 2004, 11:47 AM
My wifes 2002 Tibute just had that sensor go bad at 35000 miles, it caused wierd shifting. :angry: But, we did not notice much of a lag when pushing hard on the gas pedel.
My wifes 2002 Tibute just had that sensor go bad at 35000 miles, it caused wierd shifting. :angry: But, we did not notice much of a lag when pushing hard on the gas pedel.
Maybe it's just a problem particular to the 6 and not all Mazdas (or Fords). It's good to hear that the engineers have been paying attention to throttle response on the Mustang.
#28
I have a 2003 Jaguar X-type with the 3.0 and throttle by wire. This system is made by Ford (the engine is built in Cleveland, Oh). Under normal driving I can't tell the difference but some times when I floor it, there is a hesitation. Mine is an automatic and it is not the transmission causing the hesitation. One of the reasons they went to it was because it can better operate the traction control. Maybe with traction control off, we won't notice any difference. Time will tell.
#29
Originally posted by Sharp@July 7, 2004, 10:45 PM
I have a 2003 Jaguar X-type with the 3.0 and throttle by wire. This system is made by Ford (the engine is built in Cleveland, Oh). Under normal driving I can't tell the difference but some times when I floor it, there is a hesitation. Mine is an automatic and it is not the transmission causing the hesitation. One of the reasons they went to it was because it can better operate the traction control. Maybe with traction control off, we won't notice any difference. Time will tell.
I have a 2003 Jaguar X-type with the 3.0 and throttle by wire. This system is made by Ford (the engine is built in Cleveland, Oh). Under normal driving I can't tell the difference but some times when I floor it, there is a hesitation. Mine is an automatic and it is not the transmission causing the hesitation. One of the reasons they went to it was because it can better operate the traction control. Maybe with traction control off, we won't notice any difference. Time will tell.
#30
I just got my 2003 Lincoln LS updated to the latest software. Engine response and trannie shifting are significantly improved. The 05 Stang will have newer software. I think you guys are worrying about nothing.
#31
the underlying reason for drive by wire is for emmissions. keeping this in mind, it's easy to understand that ALL drive by wire system will have a delay or lag under certain conditions. this is EXACTLY what the dbw is designed to do. in order to meet fed requirments, especially when the engine has not reached operating temps, the computer controlling the input from the throttle pedal will NOT allow you to "floor" the pedal and expect full throttle acceleration...won't happen on ANY car...not under those conditions...this is the future of engine management systems, jackg 90seville 94k
#32
All this talk about PCMs, safety protocols, and tuning...
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
#33
Originally posted by houtex@July 9, 2004, 5:28 PM
All this talk about PCMs, safety protocols, and tuning...
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
All this talk about PCMs, safety protocols, and tuning...
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
#34
Originally posted by kevinb120+July 9, 2004, 3:48 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kevinb120 @ July 9, 2004, 3:48 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-houtex@July 9, 2004, 5:28 PM
All this talk about PCMs, safety protocols, and tuning...
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
All this talk about PCMs, safety protocols, and tuning...
Perhaps it needs a more powerful throttle motor? I mean, the thing's rather rinky dink lookin...
Just something that popped into my head. I must be nuts.
exactly. Especially a starter motor. Man those things have power to start your car in a sec. More torque than a honda
Like I said before, cars tend to evolve not the opposite.
#35
the underlying reason for drive by wire is for emissions. keeping this in mind, it's easy to understand that ALL drive by wire system will have a delay or lag under certain conditions. this is EXACTLY what the dbw is designed to do. in order to meet fed requirements, especially when the engine has not reached operating temps, the computer controlling the input from the throttle pedal will NOT allow you to "floor" the pedal and expect full throttle acceleration...won't happen on ANY car...not under those conditions...this is the future of engine management systems, jackg 90seville 94k
#36
Allow me to repeat myself:
Don't Worry About It
I think this will turn out to be a non-issue. Ford certainly is very well aware of the compaints involving electronic throttle. That last thing they'd want is a poorly responding stang. Mustang drivers are purists, they'd rather have cables etc. that allow them to connect with and feel the car. You make a substitution, it'd better not deminish that connection.
Don't Worry About It
I think this will turn out to be a non-issue. Ford certainly is very well aware of the compaints involving electronic throttle. That last thing they'd want is a poorly responding stang. Mustang drivers are purists, they'd rather have cables etc. that allow them to connect with and feel the car. You make a substitution, it'd better not deminish that connection.
#37
Yea Ford offical releases have harped on how fast the new computer system is in the Stang. Also the electronic control allows them to vary the throttle position at altitude so half throttle at 1000' will feel the same as half throttle at 5000'
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
10/5/15 09:43 AM
tj@steeda
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1
9/23/15 03:21 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM