2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Accidentally shifted to Reverse at 80 MPH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #41  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally posted by THRUST_@July 15, 2005, 12:55 PM
why does shifting to neutral while moving wreck things?
I can understand that slamming it in reverse would be bad but what would break when you shift to neutral?
Have you thought of what the clutch's function is in a A/T if the car is neutral and is shifted back to a forward gear at idle rpms while driving at 80 mph which will probably require the rpms to be somewhere at 2500?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #42  
Stoenr's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 3,270
Likes: 24
From: E. Tennessee
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@July 15, 2005, 12:06 PM
Have you thought of what the clutch's function is in a A/T if the car is neutral and is shifted back to a forward gear at idle rpms while driving at 80 mph which will probably require the rpms to be somewhere at 2500?

Heh, yeah if I do that on the Bird at 80, it seems to skip overdrive, and go down one more and you get an abrupt downshift. not that i do this all the time.

And I have to press the button to take outta drive to neutral on it.
no button required to remove from drive seems a little scary.
have had passengers in other cars bump it with there knee or something while cruisin and rev'd the heck outta the engine before driver realized what happened.

ok Im bored at work and rambling.....
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #43  
THRUST_'s Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2005
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@July 15, 2005, 1:06 PM
Have you thought of what the clutch's function is in a A/T if the car is neutral and is shifted back to a forward gear at idle rpms while driving at 80 mph which will probably require the rpms to be somewhere at 2500?
ok
so it isn't the shifting to neutral that hurts it, it would hurt it if you shift back to drive while moving. that makes sense.
thanks
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #44  
2005Stang032's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
I sometimes put it into Nuetral in my Civic when coasting down hills, but ive never thrown it into Reverse. But who cares mines a Civic, be careful with that GT
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 03:23 PM
  #45  
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
If you were to read the owners manual, it would state that you should not shift the automatic transmission while driving the vehicle. There may be sitations where you might want to move to a lower FORWARD gear, however, I see absolutely no reason to move that thing up instead of down. Neutral or reverse are not options while traveling in a forward direction at speed. Any driving instructor worth their paycheck will tell you not to touch the automatic shifter 99% of the time while driving.

If you want to play with something while driving, you should've bought a 5 speed. If you keep putting that thing in reverse at speed, you'll blow the crap out of that trans and Ford will know. They'll tell you it was abuse and ask you for $1,500 for a new trans.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #46  
vector1701's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 1, 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
The best thing to do is to keep doing it. This time go the full 100 MPH and Slam it into reverse....then and right then, let go of the steering wheel.

If you survive, I bet you will break the habit...
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #47  
wild stray's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 2005 Black GT@July 14, 2005, 8:56 PM
Well tonight while doing 80 I shifted too far and went into Reverse for about a second.

Ah, just when I thought 'E' tickets were no longer available!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #48  
Torch_Vert's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 22, 2005
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 4
From: Boston, MA
This is the oddest thread I think I've read since joining TMS. The "Why" of this behaviour is baffling to me. It seems utterly pointless, and obviously potentially damaging to a new car.

I have to agree with several of the other posters, if you need something to fiddle with while driving, a manual would have been the way to go. In lieu of that, how about doing something harmless like changing the radio stations or adjusting the sun visors to alleviate boredom? Much safer for the car than this sort of stuff.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #49  
dekujala's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2005
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
The only thing that comes to my mind when I read the original post is
"why?"
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #50  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,000
Likes: 0
Hope you aren't doing that to save gas because its just dumb IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #51  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by dekujala@July 15, 2005, 6:44 PM
The only thing that comes to my mind when I read the original post is
"why?"

Downhill off throttle speed record? :bang:
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #52  
mustangspeeder's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 24, 2005
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Give the guy a break....he made a mistake and now won't do it again.


To answer the "why" question: because he didn't know it was bad and enjoys the feeling of control while still being able to drive an auto.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #53  
GirchyGirchy's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 28, 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Originally posted by mustangspeeder@July 15, 2005, 8:10 PM
Give the guy a break....he made a mistake and now won't do it again.
To answer the "why" question: because he didn't know it was bad and enjoys the feeling of control while still being able to drive an auto.
Exactly! Stop beating the guy down, there's no point in that. He's admitted his mistake, and was just looking for advice. There's really no reason to be an a-hole, now is there?

Ford needs to equip the Mustang with a manumatic....maybe they were just trying to save a few bucks, who knows.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gigantor
2005-2009 Mustang
31
May 11, 2023 07:31 PM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
Apr 28, 2016 05:41 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
earl610
GT
1
Sep 6, 2015 05:48 PM
Cdvision
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Sep 5, 2015 05:22 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 AM.