2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

2004 Silver GT vs. 2005 Silver GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/13/04, 05:46 AM
  #1  
The Mustang Source FOUNDER
Thread Starter
 
TMSBrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
Posts: 9,887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
I wish the '05 had Bullitts, but you get the idea.

Old 10/13/04, 05:50 AM
  #2  
Bullitt Member
 
snkbtn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2004
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man, this car looks so much bigger than the current body style .... Great comparison shot.
Old 10/13/04, 06:18 AM
  #3  
I Have Admin Envy
 
Galaxie's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,739
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great picture, really shows how the '05 looks much bigger, the wheelbase helps that effect out
Old 10/13/04, 06:34 AM
  #4  
The Mustang Source FOUNDER
Thread Starter
 
TMSBrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
Posts: 9,887
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
And it looks like the doors are smaller. That should make it easier getting in and out of the car in tight spots.

The spoiler looks wimpy though.
Old 10/13/04, 06:43 AM
  #5  
Bullitt Member
 
thegoalie's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2004
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never thought the '05 looked as aggressive as the '04, but after seeing this picture I officially change my mind. The way the grill leans forward compared to the '04, it looks like it means business.

Also the '05 looks so seamless compared to the '04!
Old 10/13/04, 06:45 AM
  #6  
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 5,999
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great comparison. The 05 really looks great.
Old 10/13/04, 07:16 AM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
 
Bookman's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 6, 2004
Location: Pasadena, MD (AKA The Dena)
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I believe Brads right about that spoiler. It looks like a tooth pick in that shot. The Silver is growing on me though.
Old 10/13/04, 07:22 AM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
ace0215's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NICE!!!!!!
Old 10/13/04, 07:32 AM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
 
yellow98cobra.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2004
Location: Windsor, Cailfornia
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great comparision photos. It helps answer one of my questions. I will now check spoiler delete when ordering.
Old 10/13/04, 07:47 AM
  #10  
V6 Member
 
Dave99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 05 looks more aggressive all around, especially the rake of the car, and the front bumper. The spoiler does not look so good though...
I am really struck by how similar the cars look.
Old 10/13/04, 07:52 AM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
 
CatmanJJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BlueStangVert@October 13, 2004, 6:37 AM
The spoiler looks wimpy though.
I'll take my '05 with a spoiler delete please, good comparison shot BTW. B)
Old 10/13/04, 07:54 AM
  #12  
GT Member
 
mustangdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool shot !!! Suddenly the 04 looks a bit "old".... I don't mind the spoiler, and any color would do (ok, maybe not the white one)
Old 10/13/04, 08:15 AM
  #13  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The '05 really does just have a much better stance and presence, a lot of it due to the increased WB and vastly decreased front overhang. The '04, on the other hand, looks a bit stubby with its hobby-horse WB and pendulous front overhang.

I don't think the '05's doors are any smaller really but just look that way because of, with the front wheels scooted foreward, the greater amount of fender sheet metal between the door opening and the front wheel well opening.

I agree that the spoiler looks like the ill integrated design afterthought that it is -- blame the plaid suites in marketing -- that distracts and detracts from the '05's otherwise excellent lines and form. But I guess they felt they just had to throw a bone to those who gotta have that tired, trite and grossly overused performance styling cliche (which long ago ceased to indicate any semblance of uniqueness or distinctiveness now that every other Japanese econo-sedan has one), the tack-on, J.C. Whitney rear spoiler.

My other minor gripe with the '05 is what I see is excessive business in the rocker panel/lower valence panel treatment with that sort of whimpy pseado ground effects wannabe thing going on -- it just looks fussy, extraneous and overly delicate compared to the rest of the design. I much prefered the much cleaner '05 Concept treatment or even the current Cobra.

But overall, the '05 is a huge leap forward over the SN95 design.
Old 10/13/04, 08:36 AM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
2005muzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 6, 2004
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BlueStangVert@October 13, 2004, 6:37 AM
And it looks like the doors are smaller. That should make it easier getting in and out of the car in tight spots.

The spoiler looks wimpy though.
the doors look so much better that way. In the pic you can see the stance of the car looks lower than the 04.
Old 10/13/04, 08:39 AM
  #15  
Retired Tms Staff
 
adrenalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Great comparison. I wish Canada had the spoiler delete option
Old 10/13/04, 08:44 AM
  #16  
Mach 1 Member
 
incorrigible's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 28, 2004
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't believe pictures do the 05 complete justice! You have to see this car in person. It truley is... amazing!

Great comparison shot though!
Old 10/13/04, 09:50 AM
  #17  
Member
 
Adam_SVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a good comparison shot. The 05' looks aggresive when next to the 04'. The 05' has much cleaner body lines. Maybe it's me but the 05' looks like it could use bigger wheels.
Old 10/13/04, 10:39 AM
  #18  
GT Member
 
Red Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This picture is in this month's Mustang Times that the MCA puts out.
Old 10/13/04, 11:32 AM
  #19  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
05mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Location: Hurricane,wv/Cinn,OH,Mooresville,NC
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by mustangdriver@October 13, 2004, 7:57 AM
Cool shot !!! Suddenly the 04 looks a bit "old".... I don't mind the spoiler, and any color would do (ok, maybe not the white one)
Same here, I like the duck tail like was on MRT 05 Mustang GT.
Old 10/13/04, 11:54 AM
  #20  
GT Member
 
Vermillion98's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 25, 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love the way the front wheels on the '05 are pushed forward and lessen the front overhang when compared to the '04. This was my pet peeve about all Mustang designs after 1973; they all had the front wheels too close to the firewall and A-pillar, which looks kind of wimpy.

Having the front wheels close to firewall and A-pillar makes a car look like it's front-wheel drive, like Chrysler's "cab forward" designs.

A small front overhang with the front wheels pushed forward and a long hood reminds me of cars like the AC Cobra, Corvette, 55-57 Thunderbird, Ferrari 365 GTB , etc.

Remember how much better the FR500 looked over normal sn95's?


Quick Reply: 2004 Silver GT vs. 2005 Silver GT



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.