2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

05 Best MPG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/30/05 | 08:37 AM
  #61  
graphicguy's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
I got 18 MPG all city on my first tankful. I know it will get better as the miles increase. I expect to at least hit low 20s for highway use.

BTW....anyone who has IUP know how accurate the computer is for reporting MPG?
Old 3/30/05 | 09:18 AM
  #62  
puffyafros's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JHL981@March 30, 2005, 6:02 AM
How are yall getting 26mpg? Im only a v-6 with about 850 miles getting 21? But then again my ranger got 15, so this is a big jump!
This is what I'm saying. I'm lucky to get 21 mpg on an all hwy road trip. I average between 14-16mpg on a mix of city/hwy. I don't really care because I didn't buy this car for good gas mileage but I am jeolous of the others here that are getting way better mpg with the exact same car.
Old 3/31/05 | 09:05 AM
  #63  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally posted by graphicguy@March 30, 2005, 8:40 AM
I got 18 MPG all city on my first tankful. I know it will get better as the miles increase. I expect to at least hit low 20s for highway use.

BTW....anyone who has IUP know how accurate the computer is for reporting MPG?

Well considering that the computer knows exactly how much gas it is squirting into the cylinders and it knows exactly how many miles you have gone I would expect that this would be significantly more accurate than the traditional fill it up and compare to trip odo method.

But I don't have any actual evidence to back up my theory.
Old 3/31/05 | 10:30 AM
  #64  
graphicguy's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Originally posted by AWmustang+March 31, 2005, 11:08 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(AWmustang @ March 31, 2005, 11:08 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-graphicguy@March 30, 2005, 8:40 AM
I got 18 MPG all city on my first tankful. I know it will get better as the miles increase. I expect to at least hit low 20s for highway use.

BTW....anyone who has IUP know how accurate the computer is for reporting MPG?

Well considering that the computer knows exactly how much gas it is squirting into the cylinders and it knows exactly how many miles you have gone I would expect that this would be significantly more accurate than the traditional fill it up and compare to trip odo method.

But I don't have any actual evidence to back up my theory.
[/b][/quote]


If the computer indeed is measuring the exact amount of gas it's "injecting" and it indeed is taking into account the mileage driven, then yes, it should be more accurate than taking mileage odo readings, amount of gas per fill-up.

But, I don't know whay the trip computer is actually measuring. Does anyone know this?
Old 3/31/05 | 10:51 AM
  #65  
05WindveilGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 2, 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania
Originally posted by graphicguy+March 31, 2005, 11:33 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(graphicguy @ March 31, 2005, 11:33 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by AWmustang@March 31, 2005, 11:08 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-graphicguy
@March 30, 2005, 8:40 AM
I got 18 MPG all city on my first tankful. I know it will get better as the miles increase. I expect to at least hit low 20s for highway use.

BTW....anyone who has IUP know how accurate the computer is for reporting MPG?



Well considering that the computer knows exactly how much gas it is squirting into the cylinders and it knows exactly how many miles you have gone I would expect that this would be significantly more accurate than the traditional fill it up and compare to trip odo method.

But I don't have any actual evidence to back up my theory.


If the computer indeed is measuring the exact amount of gas it's "injecting" and it indeed is taking into account the mileage driven, then yes, it should be more accurate than taking mileage odo readings, amount of gas per fill-up.

But, I don't know whay the trip computer is actually measuring. Does anyone know this?
[/b][/quote]

The trip odo is just for measuring miles for say if you wanted to go somewhere and back. It let's you know how many miles certain things are away if that's what you would want to use it for. Or you could use it to get a rough estimate on how many MPG you are getting. That's what I do, want to talk about confusing though, my grandmother's old Mitsubishi Galant had 2 trip odos!!

Matt
Old 3/31/05 | 10:54 AM
  #66  
adrenalin's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 2
I haven't seen the specs on the V6 but I wouldn't be surprised that the GT gets better gas mileage. Stronger motor moving the same amount of weight. My example would be my friend. He has a 2002 dodge dakota V6 and a V8. His vs gets 14mpg and his V8 gets 16mpg. His v6 has to work harder to move the weight of the truck, therefore uses more gas.
Old 3/31/05 | 12:13 PM
  #67  
davam1's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 05WindveilGT+March 29, 2005, 11:22 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(05WindveilGT @ March 29, 2005, 11:22 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by davam1@March 29, 2005, 9:51 PM
Originally posted by 05WindveilGT@March 22, 2005, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by AWmustang@March 22, 2005, 9:14 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-05WindveilGT
@March 21, 2005, 7:18 PM
, you think that in a vigorous test all of those procedures would be taken into consideration. We are not talking about the degree of air comming out of the vents. Basically just if the condensor and evaporator are ON. I have facts, not links, I would like a link to show that the A/C does not take away more gasoline. Think about it simplistically - turning on something that doesn't needed to be turned on, needed energy to supply that mechanical device.

Matt


It took a while, but I found the link.

http://www.cartalk.com/content/columns/Arc...994/May/05.html



Though, some would say they have no more credibility than the Mythbusters. Either way, if you are truly worried about the gas mileage, drive with the windows closed AND the A/C off.


And Don't buy a Mustang either!


That's it. After all this, I'm gettin a Humvee!!!
Oh god an upscale Tonka truck!! please nooo!! :notnice:

Matt
[/b][/quote]

Matt, Glad I made you laugh... Only laugh all week for me.
Old 4/10/05 | 09:58 AM
  #68  
05WindveilGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 2, 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania
Hey bro, glad I can make someone happy!!

Matt
Old 4/10/05 | 10:24 AM
  #69  
maucoin65's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Retired
 
Joined: July 28, 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Originally posted by graphicguy+March 31, 2005, 10:33 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(graphicguy @ March 31, 2005, 10:33 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by AWmustang@March 31, 2005, 11:08 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-graphicguy
@March 30, 2005, 8:40 AM
I got 18 MPG all city on my first tankful. I know it will get better as the miles increase. I expect to at least hit low 20s for highway use.

BTW....anyone who has IUP know how accurate the computer is for reporting MPG?



Well considering that the computer knows exactly how much gas it is squirting into the cylinders and it knows exactly how many miles you have gone I would expect that this would be significantly more accurate than the traditional fill it up and compare to trip odo method.

But I don't have any actual evidence to back up my theory.
If the computer indeed is measuring the exact amount of gas it's "injecting" and it indeed is taking into account the mileage driven, then yes, it should be more accurate than taking mileage odo readings, amount of gas per fill-up.

But, I don't know whay the trip computer is actually measuring. Does anyone know this?
[/b][/quote]

I'm not sure how accurately the computer measures the gasoline used. But it seems to me that calculating it the old fashion way is the more accurate method, especially over a lot of miles (not per tankful)---you know exactly how many gallons you've purchased, and exactly how many miles you have driven.

Divide the miles driven by the gallons pumped, over 1,000 / 2,000 / 3,000 / 5,000 miles, and you will know you're MPGs with deadly accuracy.

Again, doing the math per tankful will not be terribly accurate b/c of the numerous variables; but if you track it over time it will be very accurate; in fact, the longer the time and distance, the more accurate your answer will be.
Old 4/10/05 | 10:45 AM
  #70  
Badandy's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 7, 2004
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
12 mpg.

almost all city, shifting late
Old 4/10/05 | 11:08 AM
  #71  
charles's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
drive slower
Old 4/10/05 | 08:20 PM
  #72  
maucoin65's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Retired
 
Joined: July 28, 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
OK, when I do the math---since the last time I reset the trip meter at 156 miles, I have driven 1,617.2 miles, and pumped to the brim of the tank / filler neck 82.504 gallons. The math says I have averaged 19.60147 MPG; the computer says I have averaged exactly 20.0 MPG.

The computer is close, but not quite deadly accurate. It would appear that there are some variables in the way the computer calculates.

Again, over time the math accuracy will increase with miles driven and gallons pumped; any error will be spread over a larger base of data, with the result that the error rate diminishes over time.

I like the computer's average MPG better; but I'd have to go with the math for the real answer.
Old 4/10/05 | 09:44 PM
  #73  
fumaca's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
I seem to get between 19 and 20 combined city-highway, which is a lot better then my SUV, and a lot more fun, too.
Old 4/11/05 | 06:57 AM
  #74  
snkbtn99's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Want better gas mileage .... go buy a Focus ...
Old 4/11/05 | 07:37 AM
  #75  
Badandy's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 7, 2004
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
macoin-Maybe the computer is more accurate. You have pumped that many gallons in, but are you sure you have used EVERY last drop of it to go that distance?
Old 4/11/05 | 10:00 AM
  #76  
05WindveilGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 2, 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
From: Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania
Originally posted by charles@April 10, 2005, 11:11 AM
drive slower
Thanks

Matt
Old 4/11/05 | 10:14 AM
  #77  
Martimus's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 5, 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: 'neath a cactus
My one concern about gas mileage stems from the anticipation that by labor day we'll be paying close to $3 per gallon for unleaded gas. Any by the time I have this car paid off we'll be paying Europe prices while our elected officials still drive around in limo's at our expense...

Ahh... you just gotta love Government!!!
Old 4/11/05 | 10:35 AM
  #78  
Giddyup's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
I'm averaging between 13-14 MPG, and it's all city driving. At the current $2.45 gallon, it's eating me alive.......but my slow death will always be with a smile on my face
Old 4/20/05 | 12:02 AM
  #79  
maucoin65's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member Retired
 
Joined: July 28, 2004
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Badandy@April 11, 2005, 6:40 AM
macoin-Maybe the computer is more accurate. You have pumped that many gallons in, but are you sure you have used EVERY last drop of it to go that distance?
Badandy---just saw your reply / comment. No, of course I'm not sure I've used every last drop. But that's why the margin of error should dimish over time---because you'll be spreading those unused last few drops over more and more miles driven, so the average MPG impact / error will get smaller over time.

I haven't read anywhere exactly how the computer measures the gasoline or reports the data. The two methods are close in result, and I suspect the old fashioned math will draw closer to the computer calculated answer over time.

The spread at that time (above) was only 19.6 vs 20.0. Not much margin already, and again, that variance margin should diminsh over time. I haven't compared it lately to see.

You gotta be a numbers guy / gal to care or even think about this stuff, I suppose. The car is still a kick to drive and own, regardless of the relative fuel economy.
Old 5/11/05 | 03:06 PM
  #80  
RaGsHoCkEy88's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2004
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
mines at 11.9 avg mpg. 470 miles on it......ive been taking it alittle easier its gonna probably hit 12 soon. i gotta do alotta highway driving tomarrow


Quick Reply: 05 Best MPG?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 AM.