1994-2004 MUSTANG, POST MEMBER PICS OF SN-95 V8'S
Originally Posted by 1999Pony
The mach is so much better.
The 2010 is faster, handles better, brakes better is more comfortable ...
Last edited by 97GT03SVT; Mar 28, 2013 at 01:20 PM.
I think in a straight line Mach 1 vs 05-10 is a drivers race, their outputs are about the same and Mach is lighter.
Last edited by steven46746; Mar 28, 2013 at 01:38 PM.
Oh I know that. That's just a personal opinion. No real basis behind it other then I would take a SN95 over and S197 any day. The way it drives, feels and the over all look of the SN95s, for me, is better. But it is all subjective.
I was thinking 2010 because they're less expensiv and I'd be able to throw alot more cash into it if I got that year. And right now my mach 1 with current mods has beaten an 05/09 GT pretty easily! I mainly like the look and ride of the the 2010, although the look of the Mach is pretty I think I could recreate it on the 10
I was thinking 2010 because they're less expensiv and I'd be able to throw alot more cash into it if I got that year. And right now my mach 1 with current mods has beaten an 05/09 GT pretty easily! I mainly like the look and ride of the the 2010, although the look of the Mach is pretty I think I could recreate it on the 10
That is a great looking Mustang. I have always been partial to the 2000 R's.
So it looks like it takes about 380hp at the wheels to run 171...I wonder what it would take to run 200?
It will take some hood pins!! The reason I let off was that the hood started doing the "Funky Chicken". I did average 153 for 2 laps.
NTTAWWT





Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 14,456
Likes: 35
From: That town you drive through to get to Myrtle Beach
Lost quite a few of mine when my HD crashed a couple months ago. I need to get her cleaned up and get some more pics, I just never think to do it when she's clean.




