Fox Mustangs 1979-1993 Mustangs Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

RWHP prediction for the fun of it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2005 | 07:19 PM
  #81  
svopaul's Avatar
Service Manager
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 625
From: Odenville, AL
The Vortech should help....with only 7lbs of boost your numbers are going to be low....to make the big numbers you will need to be at 12-15lbs of boost and the S trim should do that for you.

I recommend you upgrade to the 10 rib pulley/belt kit......been there, done that...and you're gonna need it or you will have belt slipping problems.

I would not have gone with the Victor intake....the Holley Systemax would have been a much better blower friendly intake. The Victor is better than what you had though as evidenced by the HP increase.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #82  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Update.
Vortech S-Trim with 3.33 pulley made 415 RWHP. Big difference in the torque and HP curve before it was all the way to 6200 RPM to make 376 RWHP now it makes 415 RWHP at 5300 RPM. I may run this for a while and then pulley up.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #83  
Nathan_H's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
thats good news. keep us posted. Its nice to see a project coming through so nicely.
Reply
Old May 1, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #84  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
cool, sounds good
Reply
Old May 2, 2005 | 07:39 AM
  #85  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Update.
Went to the 1/8 track this weekend. The surface seemed slick after rain on Saturday, so I was slow out of the hole with lots of wheel spin. The car ran 7.92 @ 93.5 MPH.
Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #86  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Now maybe it makes sense why all the numbers looked low, the clutch was not holding. Moving this engine over to a C4 car.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #87  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
update.
this 347 was moved to a C4 automatic car.
The cam timing was advanced 6 degrees
The vortech was changed to a Paxton NOVI 2000
The result is >450 RWHP.
In the first try at the strip it pulled the front tires a foot off the ground.
Unfortunately the torque converter was not enough for the torque.
New torque converter has been ordered.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #88  
63galaxie's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
you've got a monster on your hands glenn!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #89  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 63galaxie@July 27, 2005, 10:30 PM
you've got a monster on your hands glenn!
I see you have an 86, that is what I have put the 347 in is an 86 hatch back with C4. Based on the 1/8 time and speed on the 2 runs I made the car should be easy into the 10s and maybe high 9s.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2005 | 11:00 PM
  #90  
63galaxie's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Originally posted by angcobra@July 28, 2005, 7:33 PM
I see you have an 86, that is what I have put the 347 in is an 86 hatch back with C4. Based on the 1/8 time and speed on the 2 runs I made the car should be easy into the 10s and maybe high 9s.
awesome, i want a car that'll pull those times, but I don't think it'll be my Mustang, be a project for when im older. C4's are awesome trannies, them and C6's will stand up to anything you can do to em
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #91  
NMRAcer's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2005
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
go with more boost get that lovely 600 HP
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #92  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Not much time for racing lately but, the 86 GT ran an easy 6.80 @ 105mph in the 1/8th. It held the front tires off the ground for the first 100 ft or so. Still trying to get things dialed in, should go 6.50.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #93  
Fordracing200's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
Awesome, Do you have any pictures of the 86? I love that style. You're car sounds awesome. What kind of suspension components are you running for that car to hook up like that?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #94  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
On the front I have tubular K-member, tubular control arms, and coil overs with Drag shocks. On the rear, Lakewood uppers, lowers, and traction bars, with drag shocks. I am running 3.55 rear gear with 10.5/26 slicks.



Originally posted by Fordracing200@September 25, 2005, 4:49 PM
Awesome, Do you have any pictures of the 86? I love that style. You're car sounds awesome. What kind of suspension components are you running for that car to hook up like that?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #95  
Fordracing200's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
Awesome!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #96  
lilbossman's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 20, 2004
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
wow that must be a really fin car..... i want some pics
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2005 | 12:12 PM
  #97  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
saaaawweeeeeeet! dang thats rollin! need to get someone with a video camera and get us some video!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #98  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
I took a video Friday night, the file might be too big to post unless someone wants to host it.
Originally posted by conv_stang@October 1, 2005, 12:15 PM
saaaawweeeeeeet! dang thats rollin! need to get someone with a video camera and get us some video!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #99  
angcobra's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Update. SC belt stayed on. Car ran 6.60 @ 105 in 1/8, 60ft time was 1.42 with the wheels 1 1/2 foot off the ground. More than expected slippage of converter on top end had to let off before end of 1/4 coasted to 10.44 @ 118
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 03:53 PM
  #100  
Scothew's Avatar
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 22,692
Likes: 48
Glenn, shoot me an e-mail and I might can help you out on the video.
scothew (at) themustangsource (dot) com
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 PM.