1964-1970 Mustang Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

rear end ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/16/04, 06:20 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Longboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 16, 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Greetings,

Newbies here. Just getting started on a 1968 coupe. How do I find out the rear end gear ratio. I found these #s [WCZ F1 3.00 8FD 931] Do they indicate? or should I be looking somewhere else. The reason is I want to change the rear end to a higher ratio. Based on driving it (302 auto tranny & 9") it sounds and feels like 3.90. Definately not your freeway flyer.

Thanks!!

Deane & Robin
Old 6/16/04, 07:26 PM
  #2  
GTR Member
 
mr-mstng's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Welcome! I'm not up on my codes on rears, but the door tag should have the axle code on it.

Judging by the numbers you provided, I'm going to take a wild guess and say that you have a 3.00:1 ratiio, and its most likely and open rear. However, someone could have changed that. To find out what gears are in there, do this: jack up the rear and support it with jackstands, get under the car, get some chalk, and put a mark on the inside of the tire, then put a mark on the drive shaft. Spin the tire one complete revolution, counting the number of revolutions. this should give you an approximate idea of what's in there.

Hope this helps.
Old 6/16/04, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Longboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 16, 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that sounds correct. And many thanks. Would a 3.00:1 feel like, sound like the engine is at 3,500 RPM at freeway speeds?
Old 6/16/04, 08:57 PM
  #4  
Team Mustang Source
 
GT350Clone's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Location: Leavenworth KS
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mr-mstng is telling you correctly. According to that tag, it's a 3.00 open, but you should verify as he describes.

Do you have a tach in the car? (your ears WILL deceive you). A 3.00 ratio usually turns 2900 rpm or so at 70mph.
Old 6/17/04, 05:46 AM
  #5  
GTR Member
 
mr-mstng's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Agreed, 3500 rpm on the freeway sounds a little high.
Old 6/17/04, 06:11 AM
  #6  
Cobra Member
 
Mberglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the car originally came with a 302, the rear end is either an 8" or someone swapped in the 9".

Without overdrive, these cars will whine on the highways at 70mph.
Old 6/17/04, 06:31 AM
  #7  
Cobra Member
 
LMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a *general* way to check is to jack up the rear a bit, mark the tires and driveshaft, and rotate by hand. Count the revolutions of each and do the math. Not scientifically accurate, but it would tell you the difference b/w a 3.00 and a 3.90

Definitive test, of course, is to pull the chunk and count teeth.
________
KellyHotTeen

Last edited by LMan; 8/20/11 at 07:23 AM.
Old 6/17/04, 06:50 AM
  #8  
Team Mustang Source
 
GT350Clone's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Location: Leavenworth KS
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhh, I completely missed the 9" reference. That TAG is definitely for an 8 inch rear. Want to know for sure if you have an 8" or 9" ?. Here you go
Old 6/20/04, 04:05 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Longboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 16, 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good stuff, thanks guys. I'll verify the 8" - 9" thing. My question now is, how do I get the rpms down for freeway flying (and better gas mileage)? If the rear end ratio is 3:1, there isn't much better available, (like 2:90s:1) So, is an overdrive tranny the answer? (any recommendations on an OD tranny?) Again, much thanks

PS: I will be installing a tachometer
Old 6/21/04, 06:57 AM
  #10  
Team Mustang Source
 
GT350Clone's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Location: Leavenworth KS
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An OD transmission is the way to go. You can "have your cake & eat it too" - deeper first gear (better acceleration), plus the overdrive for highway cruising.

With a non-OD transmission, you're really limited. Yes, you can go 2.50, 2.79 or other ratios for highway cruising, but 1st gear acceleration will REALLY suffer.

Which OD? Take your pick - there's automatic OD's, 5-speeds, 6-speeds, and even auxilary OD's that attach the the back of your existing tranny. Depending on which parts you use, and the condition/quality of what you swap in, be prepared to spend $1000-$4000...
Old 6/21/04, 08:05 AM
  #11  
Cobra Member
 
Mberglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
be prepared to spend $1000-$4000...
Assumptions
5mpg increase from 17-22
$2 per gallon gas
$1000 conversion price

If you manage to get by on the cheap, you'll need to drive that pony 37,400 miles before you break even!

Granted, it's nice to cruise at 2000rpm, but don't think you're saving money by doing the conversion...unless that's what it takes to convince the wife.

Figure out what you want to do with the car. If it's a highway cruiser, install 2.80 and enjoy. If it's an around town car, install 3.50.
Old 6/21/04, 08:21 AM
  #12  
Team Mustang Source
 
GT350Clone's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Location: Leavenworth KS
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Mberglo@June 21, 2004, 9:08 AM
be prepared to spend $1000-$4000...
Assumptions
5mpg increase from 17-22
$2 per gallon gas
$1000 conversion price

If you manage to get by on the cheap, you'll need to drive that pony 37,400 miles before you break even!

Granted, it's nice to cruise at 2000rpm, but don't think you're saving money by doing the conversion...unless that's what it takes to convince the wife.

Figure out what you want to do with the car. If it's a highway cruiser, install 2.80 and enjoy. If it's an around town car, install 3.50.
Agree 100% - from a strictly financial standpoint, the numbers don't justify the change.

However, there is reduced wear & tear, the "kewl factor", plus "peace of mind". Can't put a $$$ figure on any of those easily.

Then, of course, we could all sell our classics, and spend $30K on a new Mustang (with factory OD & all the other amenities) to save that $1000! :shock:
Old 6/21/04, 09:53 AM
  #13  
Cobra Member
 
Mberglo's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No doubt there are worse ways to waste a grand. Say that three times fast.

I like the T-5 conversion a whole lot more than the AOD. I'm not even sure what the "kewl" factor is on an AOD. But that's me. :scratch:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fords4Ever
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
9
10/30/15 09:07 PM
seaclam
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
3
9/25/15 01:29 PM
DEPUTY62
2005-2009 Mustang
3
9/12/15 11:12 AM
1001yos
Ford Discussions
0
9/8/15 10:05 PM
robjh22
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
4
9/8/15 12:31 PM



Quick Reply: rear end ratio



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM.