Mach1 HP/TQ ratings.....
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
I need ratings for HP and TQ for all years of the Mach1. In all actuality as many details as possible would be best but I'm mostly looking for the HP/TQ.
Anyone have any website with these listings?
Anyone have any website with these listings?
Post *****
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
00StangGT-
Check out the 'Timeline' here on this site.
For 1969/1970 . .
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/timeline/69-70/
That should help . . .
Check out the 'Timeline' here on this site.
For 1969/1970 . .
http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/timeline/69-70/
That should help . . .
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
for which engine? 428cj has "335"hp which many have said is closer to 400
351s clev 390 hp wind 350 hp
390 not sure
i dunno about torque numbers
351s clev 390 hp wind 350 hp
390 not sure
i dunno about torque numbers
Team Mustang Source
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally posted by cntchds@April 24, 2005, 11:25 AM
for which engine? 428cj has "335"hp which many have said is closer to 400
351s clev 390 hp wind 350 hp
390 not sure
i dunno about torque numbers
for which engine? 428cj has "335"hp which many have said is closer to 400
351s clev 390 hp wind 350 hp
390 not sure
i dunno about torque numbers
The 351W was rated at 290hp, the 351C had 300hp, this was 1969 year model.....basically same thin for 1970...
the 390 was rated at 330hp......
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
sorry thats wat it says in my book the mustang pocket book under the new engines for 69 your probably right i mean y would they have more power than the 428?
though i have seen the 428 quote in many other places, that it was underrated from nearly 400 to 335 for insurance reasons
your probably right i mean y would they have more power than the 428?though i have seen the 428 quote in many other places, that it was underrated from nearly 400 to 335 for insurance reasons
Team Mustang Source
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Yes you are right about the 428, it was making a solid 400HP, as well as the Boos429 which was rated at a conservely 375HP, but in the real world it was making more in the neighbourhood of 500HP, just like the Hemi......i kinda of like when Ford underate it's engine..... 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post