1964-1970 Mustang Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
Justin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 20, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
hi, i'll be getting a 1967 or 1968 Fastback soon hopefully but i'm unsure if to get a 302 or 390, does anyone have any opinions on this? is there a big difference in the two? thanks, Justin
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #2  
BLAKE's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Depends on alot of factors. There aren't that many 67-68 fastbacks out there. I would base my purchase on the overall condition of the car, not just the engine it's equipped with. The 390 is more rare, and most likely more valuable in a collector sense. The 289-302 is arguably more streetable if you plan on driving it. The biggest difference is that one is a small block (smaller displacement, and lighter) the other is a big block (bigger and heavier). The 390 is capable of producing alot of torque. Really the 289-302 is as well, but they say that big blocks can make it more easily.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #3  
Justin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 20, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
is there a big difference in the weight? thanks, Justin
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #4  
jc69Stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
The 390 weighs alot more. The 302 small block is much better for street driving. The big block is just plain cool to have.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #5  
63galaxie's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
i don't know the difference in weight, but the 390 would make up for it in torque. If you want a high revving car, stick to the 302 because of its stroke is shorter than the 390, but the 390 is a beast, Im more of a 390 fan...hope this helps
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 08:56 AM
  #6  
LMan's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
390 = 650 lbs

302 = 460 lbs

....psst...stroke the 302 B)



source: Dave Williams, M.O. Racing Engines, Jacksonville, AR
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
jc69Stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Stroke the 302 and you will be very happy. There are many variations of 347 Stokers out there to get you in the power level you want to be at.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
1967eleanor's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 20, 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
curently i have a 428 fe in my 67 fastback i had a 302 in it before n the main diference is when u step on the go pedal i cant help you with the handling becasue whwen i did the swap i also put in a full tcp front coilover suspention and i love it but i think you could get liek a 348 stroker n be find in both hanldeing and power but personally i love my BIG BLOCK but not its extreme thurst for premium gas
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #9  
LMan's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2004
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
whoa! and thats AFTER editing!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2005 | 06:30 AM
  #10  
Justin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 20, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
I drove a fastback last Friday for the first time, the sound was awesome, better than i thought it would be.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
trackpack13gt
SN95 Mustang
6
Oct 2, 2015 08:20 PM
Evil_Capri
Mustang Motorsports
1
Sep 11, 2015 08:39 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.