2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang
View Poll Results: Do you want Start-Stop Tech?
Yes
11
13.25%
No
55
66.27%
Don't Care
17
20.48%
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll

How would you feel if this were in the next Mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/19/10, 04:22 PM
  #1  
MOTM Committee Member
Thread Starter
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,179
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How would you feel if this were in the next Mustang?

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/19/s...are-you-ready/
Old 9/19/10, 04:32 PM
  #2  
 
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Trapped in Minnesota
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 0
Received 70 Likes on 66 Posts
Stop-start technology turns off the engine whenever the vehicle is on and the driver's foot is on the brake.
Goodbye brakestands. Technology sucks.
Old 9/19/10, 04:40 PM
  #3  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
karman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,907
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Thumbs down

I don't see it working particularly well on hills with any car.
How would you brake safely down a steep hill.
Coasting downhill with the engine off is illegal in many states.
Old 9/19/10, 05:03 PM
  #4  
I will buy Jack Stands!!!
 
mustangGT90210's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
I smell many fried batteries because of this. What happens when the car gets older? Isn't it hell on a starter to keep starting a car every 5 minutes for the whole time you drive? I'm not a fan.
Old 9/19/10, 05:17 PM
  #5  
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
No thanks.
Old 9/19/10, 05:46 PM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
YSUsteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This better not happen on the stang. Its a performance car, not an econo box...
Old 9/19/10, 06:10 PM
  #7  
 
jacostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 27, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Ugh............
Old 9/19/10, 06:28 PM
  #8  
Cobra Member
 
m4a1mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 22, 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If it can be disabled, I don't care.

For an every day car it's not a bad idea.
Old 9/19/10, 09:33 PM
  #9  
legacy Tms Member
 
ford4v429's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2005
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,596
Received 66 Likes on 31 Posts
would most likely mean no stickshifts?
NO WAY.
Old 9/19/10, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,572
Received 669 Likes on 542 Posts
Not on a Mustang. Anything else, such as a Taurus? Sure.
Old 9/19/10, 09:45 PM
  #11  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 19,993
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Supposedly saves 15% of fuel.
But how much of that is the programmed 'run-on' to burn any raw fuel in the exhaust when you let off the accelerator - just to beat the EPA sniffer/rules?? Like the 'air pump' - didn't actually reduce any pollution from the cylinder - just diluted it so by the end of the tailpipe the sniffer said 'good'. What a joke!!
How about when I let off the accelerator the throttle actually CLOSES immediately!! grrr....
Old 9/19/10, 11:02 PM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
TRRBGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2008
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mustangGT90210
I smell many fried batteries because of this. What happens when the car gets older? Isn't it hell on a starter to keep starting a car every 5 minutes for the whole time you drive? I'm not a fan.
I don't think it uses the starter to start back up. IIRC when you come to a stop it compresses one cylinder without firing the plug, and then when you hit the accelerator it just sparks that plug and your off.

But then they must have a different system for diesels..
Old 9/20/10, 04:45 AM
  #13  
legacy Tms Member
 
ford4v429's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2005
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 2,596
Received 66 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Supposedly saves 15% of fuel.
But how much of that is the programmed 'run-on' to burn any raw fuel in the exhaust when you let off the accelerator - just to beat the EPA sniffer/rules?? Like the 'air pump' - didn't actually reduce any pollution from the cylinder - just diluted it so by the end of the tailpipe the sniffer said 'good'. What a joke!!
How about when I let off the accelerator the throttle actually CLOSES immediately!! grrr....
'dilutiion is the solution' as they say...I agree its odd its not the amount of pollutants they ever worry about, just the concentration.


as far as a couple posts up about using compression/popping it off to restart...well, sorry I dont think thats possible...compression bleeds down pretty quick, and one hit would not start a car to well...plus it would require gas already in there(emissions)...the fuel would be killed during braking to clear the cylinders before it stopped...at least thats my take on it.
the way like ezgo yamaha golf carts run they are a motor/generator/2 cycle (or reversible 4 stroke) with bidirectional spark...when you stop, step back on the gas a switch just turns the motor/generator in 'motor' mode whichever way the engine needs to run, as it takes over the thing goes back to generator mode to recharge it...I dont think a standard starter would be used, most likely a front half of a hybrid tranny...GMs 'modeII' hybrid tranny could do it if the torque converter has a lockup capable of driving the engine to start it...
Old 9/20/10, 08:22 AM
  #14  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was completely transparent in operation and could be turned off, then sure, why not.

People pinch pennies to put 87 octane swill in their 5.0s at the cost of some 10hp and whatever torque, so why not this and reap a substantial 15% bump in mileage (primarily stop and go obviously) with no necessary decrease in actual performance.

That 15% CAFE rating cushion would also better allow higher performance tuning rather than resorting to, say, fuel-sipper rear end ratios or engine de-tuning and the like.
Old 9/20/10, 08:40 AM
  #15  
GT Member
 
Wander's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most people don't even turn off engines waiting to pick up their kids from grammer school, or at the drive thru at the bank. Maybe there is something here??
Old 9/20/10, 10:11 AM
  #16  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
karman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,907
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Wink No drive-throughs at all

Originally Posted by Wander
Most people don't even turn off engines waiting to pick up their kids from grammer school, or at the drive thru at the bank. Maybe there is something here??
Don't get me started...
Personally, I think they should make drive-throughs illegal.
This country could save lots of barrels of oil just by that.
Old 9/20/10, 10:37 AM
  #17  
Cobra Member
 
m4a1mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 22, 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by karman
Don't get me started...
Personally, I think they should make drive-throughs illegal.
This country could save lots of barrels of oil just by that.
If the drive-through was illegal we'd all be in better shape.

Well, there would still have to be drive-through Starbucks... those are awesome.
Old 9/20/10, 12:02 PM
  #18  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 19,993
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by karman
Don't get me started...
Personally, I think they should make drive-throughs illegal.
This country could save lots of barrels of oil just by that.
And burn a few pounds too!
Old 9/20/10, 12:13 PM
  #19  
GT Member
 
Wander's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by karman
Don't get me started...
Personally, I think they should make drive-throughs illegal.
This country could save lots of barrels of oil just by that.
Yes, I agree totally. But I'm not about to tell all those mommies to not pick up their kids and why aren't they taking the bus? Around here, those are the every week day long lines. It's stupid, roll down the frekkin window and turn off the engine.
Old 9/20/10, 01:04 PM
  #20  
I will buy Jack Stands!!!
 
mustangGT90210's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by ford4v429
would most likely mean no stickshifts?
NO WAY.
I read a bit more on the topic, and the way it works for the stick shift cars is that as soon as the clutch is depressed, the engine shuts off.

Sounds like an absolutely terrible idea to me, how will anyone ever get a smooth shift that way?
Originally Posted by m4a1mustang
If it can be disabled, I don't care.

For an every day car it's not a bad idea.
Agreed. If it's defeatable with a switch on the dash or something we're all good.
Originally Posted by TRRBGT
I don't think it uses the starter to start back up. IIRC when you come to a stop it compresses one cylinder without firing the plug, and then when you hit the accelerator it just sparks that plug and your off.

But then they must have a different system for diesels..
From what I read, the start-stop cars have the alternator and starter or alternator/battery as one piece, and it's beefed up big time. But I still think this is a huge blow to reliability in the long run


Quick Reply: How would you feel if this were in the next Mustang?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.