Yes. I agree. Seeing it in a "real world" setting in that photo with a side by side makes it look much better.

 

+2

I always thought the current car was a little too bulky in the rear, the new car strikes the right proportions, particularly in the rear. The more I look at it, the more I like what Ford has done.

 

I'm still interested in knowing what the GT sounds like.

 

I would imagine the V8 sounds the same.

I'm curious what the 4 banger sounds like.

 

definitely agree. Still not sold in the front, but I like the back, except for the decklid panel.
my friend has the dodge dart turbo 4 and I quite like the exhaust note if that. If it was similar than that'd be nice.

 

I am betting like the Focus ST

 

After seeing this photo, I love the front end so much more than the rear. It just looks stunning.

 

I'm like a few others 50/50 on whether I like it or not. I'll wait to pass final judgment until I see one at my dealers lot. I am liking the options that will be available and the interior for the most part tho.

 

Here is our video from the Dearborn unveiling. Enjoy.

 

AM posted a great video of the reveal starring Justin. Check it out! It's good.

 

I think everyone should reserve judgement until they see it in person. Much like the C7. Not so great in pictures. But in person, stunning.

 

I disagree. C7 was bad in pics, worse in person. Seeing all those gray/black plastic inserts all over the car made it look like ricer's dream. The word Tacky comes to mind.

But again, opinions are like (you know what), everyone has them. So the fact that all my car buddies (including two owners of C6's - one a grandsport) who went to the car shows with C7's with me, all of us thought the C7 was garbage, means nothing, because I'm sure many many many other folks who have seen the C7 in pics and in person, LOVE them, and that's OKAY. We're all entitled to an opinion.

 

Simply my opinion, but look closely, there is little difference between the fronts of these two cars. As this "global" and "European" trend continues it will lose all sense of the Mustang distinction. Look at most cars coming at you now. Similar grills, wrapping headlights, etc. No thanks.

 

There is just a little too much fusion influence in my opinion. Not a bad looking car but not what I envision when I think mustang. That is okay though because it is still a sharp looking car.

 

Agree with both of your statements, wholeheartedly. It's not a bad looking car at all. If you took out all the badging, and removed the fact that it is a mustang, yes, it's a great looking car. The minute you throw a pony on the front grille, you get 50 years of heritage staring at you in the face. Only at that point, can I then say, it's a great looking car, but as a mustang, I feel it's lost its roots.

Again, I can't stress this enough, this is just an/my opinion. I'm not claiming this as fact, nor am I questioning anyone else's opinion.

 

My point is still valid. I never said you would like it once you saw it in person. Just an example. But reserve judgement until you see it in person.

 

That's fair. So how's this: As of now, based purely on pics alone, I don't like it

 

Couldn't agree more!

 

Not really sure, but I have the same question about not having over 300 hp for over 30 years too. As far as the sequential tail lights go, I have been following the release of every Mustang since the mid eighties. The question I have wondered and every magazine has pondered was if and when the sequentials were going to be brought back.

 

True. I've met some girls on POF who looked nothing like their pictures in person. Lol