What is the factory amount of negative camber?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: March 18, 2011
Location: MO
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is the factory amount of negative camber?
I was just hoping someone could tell me what the factory amount of negative camber the BOSS has dialed in from the factory. It might tell me in the owners manual but I am stuck at work right now and would really like to know. Thanks!
#4
#6
Legacy TMS Member
Mustang just seems to be letting the ride height determine the additional camber (I noticed this in the factory manual, cars that sat lower had a bit more negative camber)
Anyways, cloud, where did you get your DBA rotors? I plan on going with the same combo (5000/4000) when I get the new pads and fluid change.
#7
Shelby GT350 Member
Join Date: November 20, 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
#9
Bullitt Member
Gary, help me out here. I went to your revanracing link and could not find any listing for DBA 5000 or DBA 4000 rotors. Any help? Are you running the same Hawk DTC 60/70 pads you list for your GT500 on your Boss setup as well? (Or perhaps you are using PFC-01 pads which are not listed in you Boss modifications but mentioned in another thread?) What would you think of these Hawk pads (or whichever ones you are using) mated with the OE rotors? Is there an incompatibility issue?
And finely where did you purchase the lower strut eccentric bolts to obtain the negative camber?
Thanks!
And finely where did you purchase the lower strut eccentric bolts to obtain the negative camber?
Thanks!
Last edited by P0 Corsa; 5/11/11 at 11:13 AM. Reason: Wrong name initially
#13
Bullitt Member
What are others opinions on running the Hawk DTC 60/70 brake pads on the OE rotors? Will the pads "wear" the rotors more quickly due to more metallic (or ceramic?) material content? What is the track experience with the OE Ford pads and/or how do they compare with the Hawks or other aftermarket pads for occasional track use?
#15
Cobra Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Shelby GT350 Member
Join Date: November 20, 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
What are others opinions on running the Hawk DTC 60/70 brake pads on the OE rotors? Will the pads "wear" the rotors more quickly due to more metallic (or ceramic?) material content? What is the track experience with the OE Ford pads and/or how do they compare with the Hawks or other aftermarket pads for occasional track use?
Yes they will wear the OE and any other more quickly. The DTC pads (especially the 70s up front) are VERY aggressive.
The OE Ford pads are fine for occasional track use, but it depends on how fast you want to go. I can tell you from first hand experience running both setups back to back that the braking with the stock setup is much "softer" and requires greater distance. There was a 4 second per lap difference between stock and my setup between the brakes and wheels and tires. If I had to "guess" I'd attribute it to be 50% wheels/tires and 50% brakes, but if anything it was more the difference in braking. It was definitely noticable. I tend to drive "flat out" so if you don't drive as aggressively it won't make much difference. This short vid is a must see if you haven't seen it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7iUKaPlBl8
Last edited by cloud9; 5/12/11 at 11:51 AM.
#17
Bullitt Member
Thanks Gary! I talked to Van this morning about the pads/rotors and told him you sent us his way. He was appreciative.
He did say as you indicate above the DTC 70's on the front are aggressive. Perhaps (as I misunderstood your posting trailer) you might change the listing to Hawk DTC 70/60. I interpert that as 70's in the front and 60's in the rear. You currently have it listed as 60/70. Just a suggestion....
He did say as you indicate above the DTC 70's on the front are aggressive. Perhaps (as I misunderstood your posting trailer) you might change the listing to Hawk DTC 70/60. I interpert that as 70's in the front and 60's in the rear. You currently have it listed as 60/70. Just a suggestion....
#18
Shelby GT350 Member
Join Date: November 20, 2010
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
He did say as you indicate above the DTC 70's on the front are aggressive. Perhaps (as I misunderstood your posting trailer) you might change the listing to Hawk DTC 70/60. I interpert that as 70's in the front and 60's in the rear. You currently have it listed as 60/70. Just a suggestion....
#20
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: December 18, 2010
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tend to drive "flat out" so if you don't drive as aggressively it won't make much difference. This short vid is a must see if you haven't seen it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7iUKaPlBl8