2012-2013 BOSS 302

Track Day Devastation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/15/13, 07:57 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
430 Scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Track Day Devastation

So I have had several track days in my 302LS with some reasonable success....but not quite as quick as my other road car. In an attempt to bolster my ego and remain the quickest in my group of regulars I sent my car out to a local race shop for a complete suspension overhaul. I went with AST5200 double adjustable dampers, new springs, adjustable sway bars, camber plates, etc. etc. Also, I installed a new set of 18" BBS wheels in a square setup with a set of BFG Rivals. So, after all this work I ended up with an incredible result.....my car is now 4 seconds slower around the track than it was before I made the mods. I am not sure what the rates of the new springs are but the car is SOLID, zero nose dive on hard braking and no leaning on the turns. Has anybody experienced anything similar to this? My initial thoughts are that the spring rates are too high putting too much force on the tires which are not capable of allowing the car to setup in the corners. I am thinking a set of slicks might be the best starting point here....potentially softer springs????? Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
Old 8/15/13, 08:04 AM
  #2  
Bullitt Member
 
the5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2012
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defiantly get some hoosiers! Then come back! They make a word of difference!

Ever take the Scud on the track?
Old 8/15/13, 08:17 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
430 Scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by the5
Defiantly get some hoosiers! Then come back! They make a word of difference!

Ever take the Scud on the track?
Yes, that's the problem. I am comparing everything to the Scud and that just isn't fair, it's basically a race car in a beautiful costume. I will try the Hoosiers and see what happens, definitely not the best feeling to be SLIDING around every corner.
Old 8/15/13, 08:46 AM
  #4  
JPC
Bullitt Member
 
JPC's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 26, 2011
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by the5
Defiantly get some hoosiers! Then come back! They make a word of difference!
with all the suspension work you did,
the car is now asking MORE from the tires
I have not tried the new RIVAL...I want to

I agree time for some race tires
Old 8/15/13, 09:13 AM
  #5  
Bullitt Member
 
ConeBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, bigger/better rubber should help...but it if your 4 sec slower it might not fix it. You don't want to be just as fast as you used to be after mods...you want to be faster. An R compound tire as a rule of thumb is typically a 2 sec upgrade...if your really using the tire to it's potential. That's only half of what your saying you lost so I don't think it's your silver bullet.

Seems to me like you have a few settings and or parts issues. Those 5200's are great shocks with a lot of adjustability, I have them on my STi and I am very satisfied. However, I know of other Boss guys that got rid of them in favor of Penske, JRi or Koni...even JRZ has some kick *** shocks out for the S197 chassis. I think that the ASTs low speed valving is perhaps not that well sorted for our cars. But it could be a spring problem too...or something else. Sometimes you go through parts to find the right combo...I know I did and still am.

My advice would be to try to tweak the settings to get the car as neutral as possible with the way it is now before buying tires. Maybe go to a few local Auto-X events as a cheaper way to test n tune. I don't know if the shop you went to has a lot of experience setting up S197's for the track or not. But the folks at Kenny Brown, Cortex racing or Steeda might have some insights they can share to help. But make sure you know everything about what was installed, spring rates, shock settings and alignment so they can better help you.

Just out of curiosity though...how big are the rivals? I know you can get up to a 335 in 18" in that tire and I also know that your car can get at least a 315 at each corner.

Last edited by ConeBoss; 8/15/13 at 09:17 AM.
Old 8/15/13, 10:03 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
2006mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your LS should have come with R-compound Corsa's. The Rivals are not an R-compound tire. That might be the difference.
Old 8/15/13, 11:01 AM
  #7  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmichaels's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 2,460
Received 111 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006mach1
Your LS should have come with R-compound Corsa's. The Rivals are not an R-compound tire. That might be the difference.
Agree with this. I have heard the corsas don't hold up particularly well but they are R compound and should be quite sticky.

Have you tried your LS wheels/tires with the new suspension setup?
Old 8/15/13, 11:22 AM
  #8  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
I would seriously look into a Cortex rear suspension setup. I have no experience with it whatsoever but have heard nothing but incredible things about what it does to Mustangs on the track.

It is very pricey so is do some research on it. But it's a torque arm/watts link setup that uses rear coilovers and it is bolt in. Those that I've read that hav used it says it allows them to accelerate with confidence starting at the apex no problem.
Old 8/15/13, 11:29 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
430 Scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dmichaels
Agree with this. I have heard the corsas don't hold up particularly well but they are R compound and should be quite sticky.

Have you tried your LS wheels/tires with the new suspension setup?
So my Corsa's with the original suspension setup lasted a total of 1,00o miles with 2 track uses. They are completely destroyed. I did however get a new piece of information that might be helpful. As I understand the stock spring rates for the are 137 lb/in Front and 191 lb/in Rear. The shop told me they installed 700 Front and 400 Rear. Is this even possible? I takes a hell of a lot of force to get any movement in a spring that stiff so I am guessing the wheels are taking up all that force. Maybe new slicks in combination with weaker springs will work.
Old 8/15/13, 12:44 PM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
JScheier's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2011
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run 425 f, 200 rear on my AST setup. My guess is that your car may need some setup time.... because the parts you have on the list are good.
Old 8/16/13, 05:52 AM
  #11  
GT Member
 
jim woodruff's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 13, 2011
Location: akron ohio
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JScheier
I run 425 f, 200 rear on my AST setup. My guess is that your car may need some setup time.... because the parts you have on the list are good.
I too run the same set up 425/200 on the corsa tires and a Cortex watts link. 2.8 neg camber and 1/8"toe out. The car handles fine. I have found that 42 psi hot and soft settings on the shocks works better and you can run the curbs. The guys I know that have the R cars are running 600 front.
Old 8/16/13, 06:11 AM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
430 Scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jim woodruff
I too run the same set up 425/200 on the corsa tires and a Cortex watts link. 2.8 neg camber and 1/8"toe out. The car handles fine. I have found that 42 psi hot and soft settings on the shocks works better and you can run the curbs. The guys I know that have the R cars are running 600 front.
Thanks for the input guys, looks like my spring rates are way off, especially for the track I am running. Looks like I am swapping out springs ASAP.
Old 8/16/13, 07:35 AM
  #13  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
dmichaels's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 14, 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 2,460
Received 111 Likes on 101 Posts
Double check the factory shock rates, I believe there was some misinformation out there about front vs rear spring rates. I think the fronts are stiffer. But sounds like your car is very stiffly sprung regardless, little softer might be better?
Old 8/19/13, 09:41 PM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
12C/OBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 words...Driver Mod



It takes a ton of experience in a certain chassis/vehicle to maximize the potential. I have autocrossed for years and people could not believe I was top 3 ALMOST every autocross with STOCK power and minor suspension mods. The other guys had tunes, exhaust, turbos(when I went to SM) etc and 100-200 more HP and were slower. When I switch to JRZ's I regularly made FTD. Make ONE change at a time and take your time to learn the changes. Track configuration, temp, etc, can change your times more than just a simple sway bar adjustment...


You changed a ton of components and I would expect your results. I would go back to more of the stock settings on your aftermaket suspension, back to the same tires you were running, and tweak from there. It takes a LOONG time to get the perfect "setup" and with so many changes the drive mod takes even longer. Good Luck and have fun perfecting that awesome build!
Old 8/20/13, 02:32 PM
  #15  
 
RehagenRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2013
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
700/400 is WAY too stiff. Even our cars with full down force don't run nearly that high.

I would start in the 425/200 area and work from there. What size rear swaybar are you using? We try to run the smallest possible rear bar on all of our cars.
Old 8/21/13, 12:34 PM
  #16  
Bullitt Member
 
ConeBoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RehagenRacing
700/400 is WAY too stiff. Even our cars with full down force don't run nearly that high.

I would start in the 425/200 area and work from there. What size rear swaybar are you using? We try to run the smallest possible rear bar on all of our cars.
Why the small bar?
Old 8/21/13, 12:39 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
430 Scud's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: Windsor, ON
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RehagenRacing
700/400 is WAY too stiff. Even our cars with full down force don't run nearly that high.

I would start in the 425/200 area and work from there. What size rear swaybar are you using? We try to run the smallest possible rear bar on all of our cars.
Thanks for the reply. Can you suggest a decent spring manufacturer as well as sizes I need to be concerned with as I haven't received that information from the original shop that did my work.
Old 8/21/13, 12:45 PM
  #18  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Brandon302's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Crofton MD
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ConeBoss
Why the small bar?
The competition Mustangs run a smaller or no bar in the rear to increase grip by allowing the back to be as soft as possible, plus with higher spring rates you're probably over stiffening the back with a bar.

Originally Posted by 430 Scud
Thanks for the reply. Can you suggest a decent spring manufacturer as well as sizes I need to be concerned with as I haven't received that information from the original shop that did my work.
Hypercoils seem to be a good name, have them on my dad's track car and they work well.
Old 8/21/13, 03:16 PM
  #19  
 
RehagenRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2013
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brandon302
The competition Mustangs run a smaller or no bar in the rear to increase grip by allowing the back to be as soft as possible, plus with higher spring rates you're probably over stiffening the back with a bar.



Hypercoils seem to be a good name, have them on my dad's track car and they work well.
We always recommend Eibach first and foremost. We do have a couple of hypercoils in our stock, but they are emergency back up only.
Old 8/21/13, 03:33 PM
  #20  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Brandon302's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 6, 2012
Location: Crofton MD
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RehagenRacing
We always recommend Eibach first and foremost. We do have a couple of hypercoils in our stock, but they are emergency back up only.
Interesting, any reason or just because your preference is Eibach.


Quick Reply: Track Day Devastation



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:45 PM.