2012-2013 BOSS 302

New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/11/11 | 11:17 AM
  #41  
Dig-It Racing's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 5, 2009
Posts: 335
Likes: 2
From: Carrollton, VA
Some pics for y'all.
Attached Thumbnails New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda!-img_0526_2.jpg   New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda!-img_0533.jpg   New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda!-img_0535.jpg  
Old 12/11/11 | 04:40 PM
  #42  
OLOABoss's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2011
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Hot Spot
Can't comment on stock to Steeda as I was going to do a back to back test but when I was installing MM camber plates i got lazy and put the Steeda springs on instead of installing stock springs for testing 1st

Went to Sebring today and got 2 dry sessions car felt good back end hooked up and just a little push in turns. Now the bad, I could only get -2 degrees camber before the Steeda springs started binding against the shock tower.

I took a 500 mile trip with Steeda's installed and ride was firm but not uncomfortable.

Peter
Old 12/11/11 | 05:00 PM
  #43  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by OLOABoss
Can't comment on stock to Steeda as I was going to do a back to back test but when I was installing MM camber plates i got lazy and put the Steeda springs on instead of installing stock springs for testing 1st

Went to Sebring today and got 2 dry sessions car felt good back end hooked up and just a little push in turns. Now the bad, I could only get -2 degrees camber before the Steeda springs started binding against the shock tower.

I took a 500 mile trip with Steeda's installed and ride was firm but not uncomfortable.

Peter
The -2 is going to be a problem for many. Was the brake drive improved and can you add some perspective as to how much firmer the ride is?
Old 12/11/11 | 08:57 PM
  #44  
OLOABoss's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2011
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Hot Spot
Brake dive body roll was not bad at all. Wanted to do some tire temps but afternoon rain interfered. The afternoon sessions in the rain were very informative left TC on and it caught the car a couple of times when I got a little over aggressive. Wouldn't want to depend on TC for a major oops though. Sort of a pucker factor spinning the tires at 110 mph on the start/finish paint at Sebring. .

Ride is firm and well controlled and the shocks seem to handle the extra spring rate with no problem. As a daily driver I guess it depends on how firm is to much.

Peter
Old 12/12/11 | 12:16 PM
  #45  
SteedaGus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dig-It Racing
Initial impressions are a lot better than I expected. I can't believe how much flatter the LS corners now and nose dive during hard braking is considerably reduced.

Gus, please let everyone involved with development know they did a tremendous job!
Thanks for the great feedback!
Old 12/12/11 | 12:27 PM
  #46  
SteedaGus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by OLOABoss
Brake dive body roll was not bad at all. Wanted to do some tire temps but afternoon rain interfered. The afternoon sessions in the rain were very informative left TC on and it caught the car a couple of times when I got a little over aggressive. Wouldn't want to depend on TC for a major oops though. Sort of a pucker factor spinning the tires at 110 mph on the start/finish paint at Sebring. .

Ride is firm and well controlled and the shocks seem to handle the extra spring rate with no problem. As a daily driver I guess it depends on how firm is to much.

Peter
Thanks for your feedback as well!
Old 12/12/11 | 01:06 PM
  #47  
MJockey's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2011
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Gus, How long will they be offered at the sale price? Also is an adjustable panhard bar needed with these springs?
Old 12/12/11 | 01:34 PM
  #48  
GT_350's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2006
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by OLOABoss
Sort of a pucker factor spinning the tires at 110 mph on the start/finish paint at Sebring. .

Peter
The start/finish line as grabed more than it's fair share of cars over the years to include pro drivers!

Happy to hear you "only" spun the tires there!

Viper crash eariler this year


Last edited by GT_350; 12/12/11 at 01:37 PM.
Old 12/12/11 | 02:10 PM
  #49  
SteedaGus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MJockey
Gus, How long will they be offered at the sale price? Also is an adjustable panhard bar needed with these springs?
Sale price should be good through the rest of this month. A panhard bar is not required. We recommend it due to the reduced deflection from our bushings and it takes a few pounds of weight off the car as well.
Old 12/13/11 | 04:26 AM
  #50  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Gus, how is it possible that the radical change in F/R spring stiffness does not affect the balance of the car? The stock springs are stiffer in the rear than the front. Is the roll stiffness contribution from the springs much smaller than that of the bars?
Old 12/13/11 | 09:40 AM
  #51  
SteedaGus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PTRocks
Gus, how is it possible that the radical change in F/R spring stiffness does not affect the balance of the car? The stock springs are stiffer in the rear than the front. Is the roll stiffness contribution from the springs much smaller than that of the bars?
It actually DOES affect the balance of the car. The springs by themselves, assuming no other changes whatsoever, (no camber changes, tire compound, shock valving, etc) will move the car to have just a bit of understeer at the maximum handling limit. You can make changes to dial this out (more camber, shock adjustment changes, etc) but as is out of the box you can most likely expect a tendency towards slight understeer at the handling limit.
Old 12/15/11 | 10:44 AM
  #52  
Krnnerdboy's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 19, 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Gus, so what would you recommend for the track guys? Your competition springs or boss springs? Is one progressive and the other not?
Old 12/15/11 | 11:23 AM
  #53  
SteedaGus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Krnnerdboy
Gus, so what would you recommend for the track guys? Your competition springs or boss springs? Is one progressive and the other not?
You had to pose the tough question didnt you?

If I had to choose for my own personal GT, I would do the Boss Steeda springs. Theres not much of a difference between them and the comp springs. The Boss springs are a hair more cost effective.
Old 12/25/11 | 08:48 PM
  #54  
XLSPilot85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: McAllen Tx
Well figured id make my first post a useful one, installed my Steeda Boss 302
springs a few days ago, love the stance it was exactly what i was looking for. enjoy the pics.
BEFORE


AFTER

Last edited by XLSPilot85; 12/25/11 at 08:51 PM.
Old 12/25/11 | 08:53 PM
  #55  
XLSPilot85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: McAllen Tx
and here are a few extras from diff angles, I also added the louvers today.
couldn't decide between white or black, what do yall think.


Old 12/25/11 | 10:18 PM
  #56  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by XLSPilot85
Well figured id make my first post a useful one, installed my Steeda Boss 302
springs a few days ago, love the stance it was exactly what i was looking for. enjoy the pics.
BEFORE


AFTER
Very nice, how's the ride with the new springs?
Old 12/26/11 | 10:19 AM
  #57  
XLSPilot85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: McAllen Tx
Handling wise I don't track my car or drive it to hard in the twists so my comments aren't worth much. I did notice it hooked up much better from a dig and got rid of the really bad wheel hop I was getting to me that's a huge plus. Ride wise not much diff just on really hard bumps it feels a little firmer. I def recommend them, I was worried it wouldn't be low enough but it came out perfect. If you want a slammed look I would go with something else.
Old 12/27/11 | 09:49 AM
  #58  
Zoldier's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 5, 2011
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Italy
The stance looks good. Very similar to my Steeda Sports although the drop is listed as much more for the sports. I need to call Gus. I keep forgetting.
Old 12/27/11 | 09:53 AM
  #59  
5 DOT 0's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2010
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
I'd like to see some lap times with the same car and driver with stock and these Steeda springs.
Old 12/28/11 | 07:24 AM
  #60  
Mike.B's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: May 7, 2010
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Road Atlanta
Here are a few additional pics with the Steeda Springs. I Installed the Steeda HD Strut mounts and adjustable panhard bar as well. Can't comment on the handling as I have yet to have the car on the track for a proper test. Ride quality seems the same and the nose-dive under braking has been greatly reduced.






Quick Reply: New Boss 302 Spring Option From Steeda!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.